[M] (2) SMA Remnant

-NegativeZero-

United States2140 Posts

September 15 2015 21:42 GMT

Remnant 1.1
140x140
Published on all servers

This LotV oriented 2p map is effectively a "spiritual successor" to Terraform. This map preserves the concept of a separated outer ring and inner area, which are connected only by narrow, abusable chokes. However, the long corridors have been largely replaced with wide open spaces.

Version 1.1 updated the map to be more experimental, blocking all 6 chokes with the center with destructible rocks and turning the center into a semi-island. To incentivize accessing the middle, the center bases were changed to use gold minerals.

Decoration is classic WoL style, deliberately avoiding most of the simpler and more cartoon-like textures and doodads introduced in HotS.

Included in the SMA inaugural map pack.

Angled
+ Show Spoiler +

Bases (outdated)
+ Show Spoiler +

Details
+ Show Spoiler +

Tileset
+ Show Spoiler +

-Tarsonis Dirt
-Tarsonis Grass
-Tarsonis Cracks
-Korhal Wastes Rock Rough
-Korhal Wastes Dirt Light
-Korhal Wastes Tiles Large
-Korhal City Concrete Cracked
-Korhal Small Tiles

Changelog
+ Show Spoiler +

Version 1.1:

Blocked all entrances to the center plateau with rocks
Changed center expansions to use gold minerals

Version 1.0: original
+ Show Spoiler +

[PkF] Wire

France24192 Posts

September 15 2015 22:12 GMT

Definitely some nice and uncluttered work.

I would be interested, what in your opinion are the features a map shall need in LotV to be eligible for competitive play that differ from HotS ? Or is there more leeway for the mapmaker ?

sTYleZerG-eX

Mexico473 Posts

September 15 2015 22:29 GMT

I really love this one, its really one of my favourite maps of yours

Edit: you should add the SMA headers that Uvantak made.

Fatam

1986 Posts

September 15 2015 23:00 GMT

On September 16 2015 07:12 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Definitely some nice and uncluttered work.

I would be interested, what in your opinion are the features a map shall need in LotV to be eligible for competitive play that differ from HotS ? Or is there more leeway for the mapmaker ?

I saw an interesting question earlier about whether or not main ramps 100% always need to be 1 FF in lotv anymore given that protoss can open adepts and early ling floods aren't really a thing anymore because of the boosted early eco. Not sure if you could go full yolo 2 or 3 FF main ramps because of terran wanting to wall off against adepts but it's something to think about, maybe a 2 FF ramp with a neutral raised supply depot aiding in the walloff or something. I guess adepts are a major variable here so we'll have to see if they get nerfed and how hard.

Uvantak

Uruguay1381 Posts

September 16 2015 02:19 GMT

On September 16 2015 07:29 sTYleZerG-eX wrote:
I really love this one, its really one of my favourite maps of yours

Edit: you should add the SMA headers that Uvantak made.

Hmmmm don't worry about it atm. Later I'll make other ones that fit better for map threads.

Map looks pretty fun negative, one of my concerns is that once a player is in the central highground it may be hard for the other to get in the highground too, meaning that you don't see as many fights in the center of the map, but other than that not much else, maybe an army attacking the frontal third may be too hard to surround for Zerg specially if we are talking about LotV with Libs and stuff, but I really don't see how you could keep the general idea of the map at the same time avoiding that possible issue, but yeah, to me it looks like a pretty cool map, I really like the 1x ramps in the corner bases btw, I have been trying to use them more lately, they really help with the 3 base problems sc2 has.