• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EDT 17:20
CEST 23:20
KST 06:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[BSL15] Ro16 Recap Pt.13Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council0DHM Valencia: Power Rank52[TSL9] Prize Pool & Talent18Code S RO10 - Group B, Day 1 Preview (Season 2)7
Community News
2022 AfreecaTV Challengers Starleague Season 211BSL 2v2 ProLeague x ShieldBattery - SIGN UP NOW!14Code S RO10 Groups announced, RO20 final results1ESL Open #128: ByuN, MaxPax, Scarlett win3Artosis to leave Korea after GSL Season 3, possibility of online GSL casts?87
StarCraft 2
General
Doublelift on State of SC2 and the Various Regions Zest Retires Rogue & Trap out for DHM Valencia? Forbidden Ground buildings DHM Valencia: Power Rank
Tourneys
DreamHack Masters: Valencia 2022 - Main Event [TSL 9] Qualifiers HSC XXI Qualifiers [GSL 2022] Code S:Season 2 - Ro10 Group A ProBots 2022 Season 2
Strategy
herO's PvZ Simple Questions Simple Answers What should I try to work on to improve my TvZ [G] YAKS LOTV: Yet Another hotKey Setup - zerg
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [A] SC Real Scale
External Content
Mutation # 324 Violent Night Mutation # 323 Well Trained Mutation # 322 Warp Zone Mutation # 321 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion repmastered.app: replay sharing and analyzer site BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL15] Ro16 Recap Pt.1 YellOw wins poker tournament for $696,000 USD
Tourneys
Hawk vs Artosis Show match July 6th 50$ prize pool No-Worries League - Similar-Skill Match-Making Deathfate Pro Team League 2 Announcement [BSL15] - RO16 Group C - Friday 17:00 CEST
Strategy
A new RTS map for scbw Project: Strat Update ZvT Guardian Hydra Optimized Strategy before the gosus
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Final Fantasy XIV Diablo Immoral The PlayStation 5 Crossfire: Legion - A new RTS combining C&C and SC
Dota 2
[DPC 21-22] Tour 3 Discussion/LR Official Dota and Chess General Discussion TL.net migration megathread + LiquidDota archive LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net LiquidDota Site Rules
League of Legends
[Patch 12.7] Arcana Skins Release Discussion LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net [Summer Split] LoL Esports General Discussion [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council Mapping Heroes: Battleground Stats
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
British Empire Mini Mafia II TL Mafia Community Thread Chezinu streak(s) Mafia Sengoku Mafia Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting happened and people disagree on what to do The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
Day[9] Fan Club soO Fan Club Zest Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [TV] HBO Game of Thrones [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2021 - 2022 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion 2021 NFL/CFB Season McBoner: A hockey love story
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Starcraft 2 No longer going on top of Start Bar The Ultimate Mouse Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Helping
ChristianS
On Radicalization and S…
plasmidghost
Bravery and cowardice…
Starlightsun
My daughter wants to pla…
JoinTheRain
On gun violence in America…
MrBitter
First time having "S*X".
Garnet
Gomorrah
Broodwar4lyf
Getting Back to it..!.20 years…
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1396 users

[R]What do you like to see in Melee Maps?

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
l3lackjax
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada24 Posts
December 04 2010 03:14 GMT
#1
I posted this on the Battle.net Forums awhile back and it got buried. I figured since TL is largely the center of pro-starcraft (from what I've heard) that I could get some better responses here. So what do you guys personally like to see in melee map? What kinds of terrain or what kinds of neat map features do you guys really think enhances the game?

I ask because I myself am a mapper and I keep hearing people complain about imbalances in Blizzard's melee maps (Scrap Station, Kulas). Perhaps if you guys could provide information as to what you would like to see in a melee map we could build better ones for you guys to pwn on in the future.

I realize that me =/= Blizzard but who knows maybe they might read this one day and learn from it.

~ Thanks :D
Mapmaker
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
December 04 2010 04:36 GMT
#2
I would say creativity is the most important thing. Everything else, just look through the various map threads
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
Barrin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5002 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 04:48:58
December 04 2010 04:48 GMT
#3
Hi! Welcome to the Team Liquid community!!! This is literally the best thread topic in existence which makes you about as leet, so I sincerely hope you stick around

*Clears throat*

I like to see symmetry. Every inch matters, but in some cases it's actually rather ambiguous which side a small little indent here or a little extra bulge there on a cliff really favors. I am actually going to make an entire thread to this type of thing though. Symmetry includes both the pathing mesh, placement grid, and map bounds. + Show Spoiler +
The only time it's okay to deviate a little from intentional symmetry is when you're making terran wall-offs (outside the main) equal on all positions with consideration to their addons. I haven't actually figured out how to do to this yet but something tells me it's possible.


I like to see just the right amount of features with high spectator value.

I like to see interesting creativity without being too bold (going overboard). This includes an understanding of strategical possibilities with keen insight into both current and future metagaming. This also includes a thorough understanding of both micro potential of each unit and macro potential of each race.

I like to see ideal places to defend certain areas (main&third in particular) that cover MOST attack paths, but with a decent attack path that can circumvent the ideal defense position with special attention to reaction time scouting potential and movement distance.

I like to see valuable positions that once taken spread your bases and thus army relatively thin, but not too thin. In other words, moving to defend these valuable positions should require you to move portions of your army outside of an ideal comfort zone defending initial areas.

I like to see a mix of open and closed areas with special attention to flanking, force field use, concaves (and spread potential), defendable chokes, and surface area reduction. All of this has the potential to be very good or very useless without being placed in the right areas or in the right way. Special attention must be given to precise sizes of everything involved... every tile matters.

I like to see a reasonable (not overpowered) way to set up a contain.

I like to see attack alternate routes that are not covered completely by watch towers. + Show Spoiler +
Part of what I mean by this is that it's a good thing if a watch tower peeks slightly over it's "designated" area, just so it has the potential to see things that the enemy might not think it will see with careless movement.


I like to see clever and plenty of LoS Blocker usage.

I like to see creative destructible rock usage. I do not like to see too many destructible rocks.

I like to see dead space and cliffs used generously to promote the use of air units.

I like to see special attention to both rush distances and distance from every base to every other base with consideration to how each type of unit (ground / cliffwalker / air) can traverse that distance.

I like to see reasonable potential for both short games and longer games on most maps.

I like to see balance, but not an excruciating amount of balance. 55% winrate for a certain matchup on a certain map is extremely reasonable, especially in the context of a map pool. I like to see viable strategies for all races in all matchups on all maps.

I like to see very beautiful maps with distinct themes and extreme attention to detail. I also like to see certain areas contrast well with certain other areas.

I like to see all of this, BUT implemented in such a way that it harbors FUN for all parties involved.

Anyways I like to see a lot of things (and I might add in more later), but what I really like to see is a tremendous amount of thought put into a single map. + Show Spoiler +
(and that doesn't mean it has to be some 256x256 extremely complicated map)


- Barrin
Grandfather of LotV's resource model. "Fewer Resources per Base"
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 04 2010 14:45 GMT
#4
Welcome! You'll find a lot of devoted people here, and plenty of constructive criticism. I would recommend just throwing out some maps and seeing what sort of feedback you get. The discourse over many threads has been quite extensive, so look through the custom maps forum to check what's been going on.

As for my personal response, I can't improve on Barrin's exhaustive list . I'll edit with anything I think of, but I have nothing to add or subtract at the moment. Lol.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Madsquare
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany157 Posts
December 04 2010 15:51 GMT
#5
"If i had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
I do not obey any norms. I redefine standard with every thought I make.
MAPPoVe
Profile Joined September 2010
86 Posts
December 04 2010 16:19 GMT
#6
Another thing I would add is the usage of space, be it open space or some kind of flancking route.
Every open space area should be there for a reason worth fighting for. With the enhanced pathing, flancking routes can be very narrow now.
One should waste space as less as possible, making it important to combat for different key areas.
my maps -> http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=160218
Barrin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5002 Posts
December 04 2010 16:38 GMT
#7
One should waste space as less as possible, making it important to combat for different key areas.

Something like that was actually going to be the next thing that I mentioned.

I do not like to see extraneous areas. While every tile does indeed matter and a smaller version of an extraneous map will never be the same... In your maps you should get to the point. + Show Spoiler +
But as I argued in another thread that's not really worth linking to, every piece of terrain has the potential to do something. Just make sure that it actually fits in to the overall idea of your map.
Grandfather of LotV's resource model. "Fewer Resources per Base"
PlaGuE_R
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
France1151 Posts
December 04 2010 17:07 GMT
#8
maps that favor mid-late game with easy to take expos (but not too easy to hold) also with medium rush distance so that rushes are possible and a threat, but not viable enough that it would be the go to strat forever (2 rax on steppes for example) In my opinion the best design of any map on the map pool is Steppes of War, if it was just bigger, it'd be perfect. Lots of expos, easy 3rd leads to good 4th and 5th bases. The tiny area is whats bad about it
TLO FIGHTING | me all in, he drone drone drone, me win - SK.MC | JINROLLED! | KraToss for the win
Steezysn0brdr
Profile Joined November 2010
United States16 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 20:46:20
December 04 2010 19:58 GMT
#9
On December 04 2010 13:48 Barrin wrote:

I like to see clever and plenty of LoS Blocker usage.

I like to see creative destructible rock usage. I do not like to see too many destructible rocks.

I like to see dead space and cliffs used generously to promote the use of air units.

I like to see special attention to both rush distances and distance from every base to every other base with consideration to how each type of unit (ground / cliffwalker / air) can traverse that distance.

I like to see reasonable potential for both short games and longer games on most maps.

I like to see balance, but not an excruciating amount of balance. 55% winrate for a certain matchup on a certain map is extremely reasonable, especially in the context of a map pool. I like to see viable strategies for all races in all matchups on all maps.

I like to see very beautiful maps with distinct themes and extreme attention to detail. I also like to see certain areas contrast well with certain other areas.

I like to see all of this, BUT implemented in such a way that it harbors FUN for all parties involved.

Anyways I like to see a lot of things (and I might add in more later), but what I really like to see is a tremendous amount of thought put into a single map. + Show Spoiler +
(and that doesn't mean it has to be some 256x256 extremely complicated map)


- Barrin


This ^

Adding areas of high spectator value but at the same time maintaining balance is also what I appreciate from the map maker when playing custom-mades.

I'd say the three most important things to consider (to sum up Barrin's post) is:

-Multiple paths, areas to flank, alternate routes.

-Well placed XnT's and LOS blockers.

-Plenty of dead space around the map where air units can fly and room behind the minerals (crowded and land blocked minerals in your main are unappealing). There needs to be room for units to move and react behind the mineral lines, be they attacking, or defending.


Most of the time+ Show Spoiler +
As Barrin had already mentioned!
subtile imbalances are important to how matches will develop as a whole when played on the map, and that is the most interesting aspect of integrating certain terrain features. What people call "imbalances" simply add to a more exciting and strategic game, forcing players to evolve their strategy when on the map. Since most "balance" issues stem from high ground/low ground terrain architecture, I think most of us agree that its about time we start seeing Z making full use of drop tech and producing some deadly, creative tactics! + Show Spoiler +
(Not referring to bling drops as every good player should have that in their arsenal already.)
Despite your pseudo-bohemian appearance and vaguely leftist doctrine of beliefs...
Brother Roga
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland38 Posts
December 05 2010 13:11 GMT
#10
SNOW MAPS!
*Only the eager martyr hoards a war.* 'Adeptus Astartes, Vol. III, Chapter VI.
Whiplash
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2927 Posts
December 05 2010 16:24 GMT
#11
I like to see a main without a back door and a natural that doesn't have too wide of a choke. Think Shakuras or Lost Temple.
Former professional broadcaster. Back in college to get a degree, then back to e-Sports!
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
December 05 2010 16:25 GMT
#12
On December 05 2010 00:51 Madsquare wrote:
"If i had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford


while this is true, its not an entirely applicable statement; this would apply to the design of the first map compared to whatever was before it
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
BuuGhost
Profile Joined December 2010
Netherlands340 Posts
December 05 2010 22:09 GMT
#13
Nothing graphic intensive but still nice looks, Nobody wants a laggy melee map that laggs like hell,
"Kinda like this thing but there’s something you should know, I just came to say hello."
Barrin
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5002 Posts
December 06 2010 21:26 GMT
#14
happy birthday l3lackjax
Grandfather of LotV's resource model. "Fewer Resources per Base"
TSM
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Great Britain584 Posts
December 06 2010 21:31 GMT
#15
everything but destructible rock back doors

The person to smile when everything goes wrong has found someone to blame it on - arthur bloch **** tl:dr *user was banned for this post*
SnuggleZhenya
Profile Joined July 2010
596 Posts
December 06 2010 22:36 GMT
#16
No gimmicks! Xel Naga Caverns is popular for a reason! Maps like Scrap Station aren't for a reason. I think that pretty much sums it up for me
You'll never get better being an angry nerd sitting alone in your room.
G_Wen
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada525 Posts
December 06 2010 23:27 GMT
#17
While Barrin covers nearly all the bases I think there is one thing that need to be added before any map is complete.

Elegance. The map needs to be simple. Not dull but it needs to have a neatness that can be picked up quickly. If the map is complicated it needs to come naturally otherwise it will be too messy to play on.
ESV Mapmaking Team
BoomStevo
Profile Joined August 2010
United States332 Posts
December 06 2010 23:41 GMT
#18
On December 07 2010 08:27 G_Wen wrote:
While Barrin covers nearly all the bases I think there is one thing that need to be added before any map is complete.

Elegance. The map needs to be simple. Not dull but it needs to have a neatness that can be picked up quickly. If the map is complicated it needs to come naturally otherwise it will be too messy to play on.

Each aspect and feature of a map having a purpose and working harmoniously together to provide a unique experience.

Elegance. That words sums up my feelings so well. I agree and thanks G_Wen.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158246 - My Maps
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 07 2010 05:34 GMT
#19
On December 07 2010 08:41 BoomStevo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 08:27 G_Wen wrote:
While Barrin covers nearly all the bases I think there is one thing that need to be added before any map is complete.

Elegance. The map needs to be simple. Not dull but it needs to have a neatness that can be picked up quickly. If the map is complicated it needs to come naturally otherwise it will be too messy to play on.

Each aspect and feature of a map having a purpose and working harmoniously together to provide a unique experience.

Elegance. That words sums up my feelings so well. I agree and thanks G_Wen.


I would consider this a cardinal rule of design, in the most general sense. It should be ever-present in your mind when considering your options, and taking stock of what you have and where you're headed.

As an aside, basically every successful map has that "oh I get it" moment of comprehension almost at first glance. But most of the best maps have layers of "oh I get it" that don't reveal themselves immediately. I don't think it's a requirement, but I think it's a hallmark of superlative work that you create this layered depth.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-09 03:45:45
December 09 2010 03:43 GMT
#20
Here's what I have to say about maps. A lot of this can be carried over into other games than SCII, so keep that in mind.

Everybody likes aesthetics. I'm not going to lie. Gameplay, while it is the most important out of everything for your map, no one will care if it has bad aesthetics. Your map will be buried like a lot of other ones. I suck at textures and aesthetics, so I'm not the person to talk to about these...

Symmetry. This goes with gameplay a lot. Your map needs to be symmetrical, whether it is inverse, converse, or rotational, it needs symmetry. On four player maps, be careful using rotational symmetry, because it can give the player on one side of the map an advantage in where they spawn, like on Factory, by Archi. This would make a great inverse symmetrical two player map, but not a good four player map.

Attack paths are extremely important. You need to have multiple attack paths, but not too many. A good example of excellent use of multiple attack paths would be the map Erebus by BoomStevo. This map allows multiple attack paths to all of the expansions beyond the natural, and allows great map flow from hi to low and vice versa. That is also important in making sure that Terran is not overpowered (Siege Tanks...) by being able to lockdown the enemy player at a certain spot by having a high ground advantage. To add onto this, the fastest way to get from main to main (or nat to nat) should also be the most dangerous path and other the least amount of expansions. Sometimes that expansion rule can be bent, like with maps that have the high yield expansions in the center of the map, which makes them very hard to control/defend. The first map that I thought of was prodiG's Enigma, but there are plenty of maps that do this.

Expansions beyond the natural should be out of the way for both you and your enemy, unless they are islands or high yield bases. Islands should be placed in such a position that building a CC and flying it there from your main or natural would be a bad idea because it crosses over a lot of land and is far away. A lot of Konicki's maps, such as Lebasse Pass, Sungsu Crossing, and Sanshorn Mists have island expansions that are out of the way. Lebasse Pass would be the best example of this. Islands are not necessary, but if you are going to have them, do it right. You can place two islands, one for each player and have them rather far away, or place one island, like on Konicki's Orbital Divide, and on Scrap Station, equidistant from each base.

Standard high yield expansions consist of 6 high yield mineral patches and two vespene geysers (not sure if the standard expansion has high yield gas, your choice I guess). High yield expansions are usually covered by destructible rocks, like on Blistering Sands and Kulas Ravine. This is so that players cannot fast expand to these locations and get away with it. High yield locations that are not covered with DRs should be extremely hard to defend, and should be noticeable by either a Xel'naga Watchtower or a frequently travelled position on the map. High yield locations should be near frequently travelled locations on the map, such as directly in between you and your enemy, and should be in vulnerable locations. They can be on frequently travelled locations, or just force players to move slightly out of their way, but again, this can be bent and modified depending on how the map flows.

NEVER put a high yield expansion on an island, this favors Terran a lot because of MULE mechanics and their flying buildings.

You don't really want to place DRs on islands unless you really have to; keeping out of early game reach is better than doing that.

XWTs should be placed in frequently travelled locations or desirable locations. They should reveal attack paths. Whether or not it should reveal the main attack path or a side one again depends on the map. Emerald Plateau by Madsquare has XWTs that overlook an alternative path to your enemy, and reveal not so much about the middle. Blistering Sands has XWTs that reveal the entrance to the player's naturals, the middle path, and the side path, and are extremely important to hold on that map. Island XWT placement is generally a bad idea because it gives Terran easy access to them, and they already have Sensor Towers.

Backdoor entrances are okay to have for naturals, and should have a DR. Backdoors are only okay for main bases if the time to travel from the natural choke to the backdoor is a good amount larger than the time it takes to travel from defending the natural choke to defending the backdoor. These backdoors must have a DR placed.

Line of sight blockers should be placed in locations that they would be needed in. Most people would like creative placement of these for both aesthetic value and gameplay value. LoSBs can be placed near choke points, and by destructible rocks (example: Blistering Sands; Metalopolis, even though it doesn't have a backdoor it has LoSBs for a drop zone).

Original ideas are both good and bad. As SnuggleZhenya said, Xel'naga Caverns is a good map and it is pretty straight forward; no original ideas. Scrap Station is terrible because it was too original, but maps like Match Point and Blue Storm (BW maps, I'll add links to remakes tomorrow) because they are 100% original and good because of it. I know they are not very good examples because they were made for BW, but they are examples nonetheless.

Room behind minerals on all bases where players can build stuff, where air harassment can take place, and where early game harassment can take place. I recommend two to three blocks of buildable room.

Maps should have equal potential in each stage of the game (dammit, I lost the game). Blistering Sands is notoriously known for one-base builds because it is very potent then, but not so much later on. Your map should be equally opportunistic for early game and late game. It's okay to make maps that are early game oriented and maps that are late game oriented, but a middle groud is usually the best.

Choke points are important to have on a map, but don't overdo it. There needs to be open areas for flanking (mainly for Zerg) and chokes for defending certain areas.

Your map needs orientation, which isn't hard to achieve. The map needs to be understandable and comprehendible. You don't really have to worry about this point as much because it is very easy to accomplish.

Oh yeah, welcome to the community! I'll be looking forward to see your first map!

1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 789
UpATree 119
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1141
Aegong 162
Dewaltoss 160
Jaeyun 78
IntoTheRainbow 10
yabsab 8
Dota 2
qojqva6868
Dendi3908
canceldota292
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
fl0m2339
Super Smash Bros
PPMD385
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu685
Other Games
Grubby2059
Beastyqt893
byalli525
jkaem163
JimRising 136
febbydoto29
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick4703
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO381
Dota 2
BeyondTheSummit286
StarCraft 2
OGamingTV SC2 153
Blizzard YouTube
[ Show 23 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• SteadfastSC348
• SC2Artist 18
• Adnapsc2 7
• CSOeSports
• Laughngamez YouTube
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• Poblha
• Gussbus
• intothetv
• Migwel
• aXEnki
• Alpha X_
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 38
• sscaitournament5
• Michael_bg 2
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Froggen1504
Other Games
• imaqtpie2178
• Shiphtur1357
Upcoming Events
ESL Pro Tour
1h 40m
KCM Race Survival
12h 40m
DPC 2021/2022 Tour 3
21h 40m
Evil Geniuses vs TBD
OSC
22h 40m
TeamLiquid StarLeague
1d 13h
TeamLiquid StarLeague
2 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
3 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
4 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
4 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
5 days
[ Show More ]
ESL Pro Tour
5 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
5 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
5 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
6 days
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Ultimate Battle: Soulkey vs Rush
DH Masters Valencia
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 5
ESL Challenger Valencia 2022

Ongoing

BSL Season 15: GosuLeague
Luck Over Strength
STL37
RCG 2021
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2022 Season 2
Nine-Tathlon Invitational
HoneyCai Friendlies Season 4
GAN Race Survival Season 4
CWCL Season 4
FS Mania
Big Baby Popularity Contest
KCM Race Survival 2022 Season 2
BSL Season 15
Deathfate Pro Team League
TOP Challenge Qualifier
WTL 2022 Summer
2022 GSL S2: Code S
StarCraft II: NationWars 7
Community Clash League S4
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Quals.
Masters Clash Champ. 2022

Upcoming

Deathfate Pro Team League 2: Qualifier
Future Cup 4 (U18)
NiuPi Cup CN vs KR 1: Mihu vs Mighty
TOP Challenge
2022 ACS Season 2
NiuPi Cup 7: Soma vs sOrry
WSL Season 3
IEM Katowice 2023
2022 GSL: ST 2
DH Masters Atlanta
2022 GSL S3: Code S
TSL 9
HomeStory Cup XXI
X-Cup Summer 2022
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 10
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 9
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 8
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 7
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 6
IEM Rio Major 2022
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2022
ESL Pro League Season 16
BLAST Premier Fall Groups
ESL Challenger League S42 NA
ESL Challenger League S42 EU
ESL Challenger League S42 AP
IEM Cologne 2022
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2022 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.