• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:32
CEST 17:32
KST 00:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL62Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event21Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Practice Partners (Official) ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 634 users

custom map : Hades' Locker - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 09 2010 10:32 GMT
#21
On November 09 2010 07:31 darklordjac wrote:
Wait so a hard natural and very skinny. Basically zergs expos are very hard to get and terrans siege tanks will own everything on the ground


whatabout the north gold expos
not to your taste?
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 09 2010 11:06 GMT
#22
On November 09 2010 08:25 Omigawa wrote:
There needs to be more open space in the middle, as it is right now I don't think Zerg could get a surround unless they came from different directions. It looks Terran can hit 3 different paths if they siege behind the destructible rocks just south of the main. Stalkers could also probably blink between paths. It doesn't seem particularly balanced. And I don't think you can just throw down a blanket statement like "you should never let Terran get too many siege tanks". Even in high level competition, like Jinro vs Painuser from MLG Dallas, both of them had 10+ siege tanks for the majority of the game. Sometimes it's inevitable.

I think you should at the very least open up the middle of the map, do away with some of the destructible rocks, and widen the paths. I think five Xel'Naga Towers are slightly excessive as well.

Cool concept though, I just don't see it being balanced/ready for competitive play any time soon.


sorry, just realized

you have not tested this map...?
the pathways are not cramped (for surrounds), just the drawing of the path makes it feel like that
of course if u only move with maxed out armies it will be a whole other story...
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
ezdez
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia28 Posts
November 09 2010 13:03 GMT
#23
I think that people are being unnecessarily harsh in criticizing your map whilst you are also not taking on board the critique given to you. This is very typical of TL. Whilst balance does seem to be a word thrown around, you must also give thought to the definition which you apply yourself. This is also typical of TL.

You mention that the term balanced is used by sheep, and that it is their narrow-mindedness and inability to see different strategies. I propose then what your belief of balance is on your map regarding the points given by other posters:

1) No space to surround - you do mention that the paths are not as narrow as people think and you are correct; but they are also not as wide as you think. It doesn't take a maxed out army to make it hard to micro your units around. Try taking 10 stalkers or 10 roaches down a path, and see if you can effectively concave them. (Perhaps this is a point missed because of lower levels not understanding the effectiveness of some units having concave).

Further more, try this for yourself: 20 zerglings against 5 hellions on your map. Attack-move both forces down a choke. How many zerglings survived? Now try this: have 10 zerglings attack from the north, and 10 zerglings attack from the south. How many survived this time? Some units (mainly melee) benefit more from surrounds and hence become unbalanced when one race does not have units that require surrounds, and so this map is more effective for that race.

You mentioned that your aim was to force trench warfare - force people to use multiple attack routes. Take for example you are defending the left position. The enemy has taken the middle two rocks and attacking you from your west entrance. You spot this with the many zTowers. How do you move your units, all the way around so that you can come up behind the enemy to get a good surround to defend yourself? You can't. Simple as that, and so people complain about balance.

2) Blink distance of paths - You seem to value strategy, which is good and "trench warfare" forces this in real world situations. For Starcraft though, this favors one race mechanic over the other. Reapers, Colossi and Stalkers can traverse cliffs - allowing them to take advantage of terrain. The trenches which you have created unfortunately is not a terrain type all 3 of these units can take advantage of; reducing the effectiveness of Reapers and Colossi as harassment units. When one unit has a large advantage over the other, is this not unbalanced?

This is effectively the same as having multiple cliffs - allowing for cliff traversing units to harass, whilst the race without cliff traversing units cannot. Which brings me to the next point.

Your argument may be that Protoss players can make Stalkers instead of Colossi, or Zerg can make Mutalisks instead. If your map naturally forces towards one unit composition, does that not then make it a 2 dimensional map which becomes boring real quick? Does that also not mean imbalance when a race MUST use a particular unit.

Closing
Sorry for the rant, but I see this so much in TL. People (children) shouldn't be throwing your rank in your face to tell you that you can't make a map. It's not right. Having said that, a low ranked player who watches some high level replays can tell how the units interact with each other. Perhaps try to take away from the comments their real meaning: "I like the option to rush (or I like the opponent to have the option to rush so I can defend and out macro), and the 100 health rocks whilst taking only 5 seconds to destroy - may lead to my rush failing as it can mean the difference between having no defense for 5 seconds and having a full round of production defending the base".

Keep in mind too, there are better deterrents to rushing other than destructible rocks.
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 09 2010 14:09 GMT
#24
thank you
i like when people give insightful comments and i do agree that this map is not perfect at all for all matchups strategies units race skill...
i like thorough concepts in maps and i wish people would test it to actualy fix the bugs and battle the preconceived notions most players have about any map by watching a minimap view

as for the rush, REALLY ... try it before saying it deters/slows anything

on a side note, i don't understand...
"there are better deterrents to rushing other than destructible rocks"
i feel a misconception: ...
i think this map is good for rushing "to go fucking kill him (tm d9)"
i've referenced my first 3 maps as tributes to bloodbath from warcraft 1
and i love rushing (not particularly with zerg but hey, i've done it...)


i'm trying to further blizz maps concepts, not copy them
in my mind you start opening the low hp rock blocks in the first 3 minutes,
it's point is only to slow down the first scout...
and you get the added value of slowing down with temporary chokes when retreating or such
a bit of the single player feeling if u must know how i feel about it

choosing random does force the "normal" players to go out and scout me, so i guess i'm biased

thank you for the "shouldn't be throwing your rank in your face"
i don't even agree with his analysis:
you only have to love ze game, even not practicing would be fine by me, just loving the game...

and i repeat: i've cracked ze nugget since tides of darkness, eagerly awaiting the dark archon back in scbw ... i'm the man...
as for sc2, i didn't get beta but i got it right at launch so i'm as knowledgeable as the next player out there... and i make maps so... i'm past ridicule or trollbites

also:
"whilst you are also not taking on board the critique given to you"
wait wait wait, i'm taking it all in... working on publishing 3rd with 2 nats in the main, still tribute to bloodbath, but more bridge to bridge oriented, a 4 player map for all those 2v2 s (4real)
i love the idea of 4 mains, but it reduces the space for funsies

"concave"
sorry i cannot play more, but ...hush hush... i get by only with said skill (the better concave), and a bit of the upgrade and macro helps too...

the map favors drops nydus warp ins cliffing blink forcefields towers crawlers...
(i admit i'm not as good with the cracklings, but its not intentionnal)

my goal is to see variety played on my maps not to bottle it down to 2/3 per race

and no i do not prefer terran and yes i do think blizz favors them, just like they will favor z next, and finally toss

"The trenches which you have created unfortunately is not a terrain type all 3 of these units can take advantage of"
i respectfully disagree, i think the rocks do not hinder a very stratified map, the cliff walking ability will be awesomely vital (especially for scouting defense and attack) in both victorian checkmate and hades' locker, my first two downloadable published (on tl) maps

not so much in my third

"imbalance when a race MUST use a particular unit"
i agree
i hope it's not the case in my maps, i feel you have to ponder 10 minutes on tier 1 and then if both players are still up and running you need to tech and macro
to each his own

foreclosing:
i'm not a tl wizz poster, i still remember you had to have 500 post to be eligible for beta keys ...
didn't care much for that attitude

have a nice day, hope you try my maps out and post comments
gogogo








http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
PlaGuE_R
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
France1151 Posts
November 09 2010 15:22 GMT
#25
this map seems like it would be fun as a tower defense map. As it is, it just feels too gimmicky and impossible to win agaisnt Terran who just mass tanks. Sorry i give this a thumbs down, better luck next time
TLO FIGHTING | me all in, he drone drone drone, me win - SK.MC | JINROLLED! | KraToss for the win
GrapeD
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada679 Posts
November 09 2010 16:15 GMT
#26
Okay I like the concept of the map but I think that it would be incredibly imbalanced. Siege tanks would own this map like an auto win and blink stalkers could just walk into the mains. I think that if you put some terrain differentials in to give defenders better cover it might be a little more balanced. Also if you're making a map and ask for critique don't argue about the mechanics of the game with the people critiquing you, its just bad.
Some people hurt people. I defenestrate those people.
-{Cake}-
Profile Joined October 2010
United States217 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-09 17:37:40
November 09 2010 17:26 GMT
#27
On November 09 2010 18:56 baskerville wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2010 12:49 -{Cake}- wrote:
On November 09 2010 10:25 baskerville wrote:
On November 09 2010 09:03 -{Cake}- wrote:
... it is almost impossible to rush


why?
not because of the rocks?
(they are 100hp, a decent unit will pass any blob in less than a minute)
and have fun


... having to frantically micro ...

you're kidding right?

ze rocks are 100 hp
takes one roach/zealot/marine to open ze chokes up

ever heard of queuing ("control") attacks?
once the high hp rocks are identified, just queue the attacks on every low hp in the right order...

nah u had to be kidding

"frantically", .. that's hilarious that is



Quotes out of context are always good for backing up your posts *eyeroll*

Of course it is 0 micro at all to kill the rocks, the point was, you said to kill the rocks if you want to rush,...I said the time you spend doing that weakens rushes because the defender has more time for his defender's advantage to kick in. I gave an example about warpgates saying 10-15 seconds is the difference between some frantic micro to hold off a rush and a comfortable, easy hold

What did you honestly expect when you posted a map? People to tell you that everything is absolutely perfect? You seemed like you wanted constructive criticism, you got it, now you aren't happy with it? That doesn't make any sense...

Overall, I was saying rush strategies are weakened, I personally hate rushes, and love long macro games, but diversity is necessary for creative strategic high level play, meaning, the option should remain viable..., and a big map, with long ground distances and no natural, cuts down on options
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 09 2010 18:25 GMT
#28
the low hp rocks favors both type of strategies
you can micro back and forth at rapidly disappearing chokes
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
Omigawa
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1556 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 02:57:50
November 10 2010 02:54 GMT
#29
On November 09 2010 18:48 baskerville wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2010 17:23 flowandebb wrote:
As a zerg player, this map makes me weep.

May I ask what league you ARE in baskerville? I'm in gold league myself but even I can recognise imbalance on a map when I see it.


Oh yes ...you may ask


lol


if u want to test someone, u do not ask what color of hair or the count of his teeth ...

u just pm that person with your game id, he'll respond by giving you his game id...
and then at the convenient time, play said custom map (one of mine, them being the subject of contention and all...)
i'll even take zerg every time...

it's not ze size zat matters, it's what you do with it


ps:
i'm far from thinking that any of my maps are perfect, or even "balanced" (whatever that means) ... however, i feel that players have a ravishingly narrow understanding of the fact that their opinion (while as honorable as anybody else s) is but a lazy afterthought .. until they actually play the map ...

then again i'm not diamond so i should sell my sc2 cd, i'm unworthy of having any fun with it


creepers jeepers


I think you're getting offended over nothing. People are just simply stating that this map is imbalanced and wouldn't work for competitive 1v1 play. Some people may have gotten a little bit personal, especially about your rank, but that's to be expected. And it does matter for the most part. Instead of telling people that their opinions don't matter until they play the map, maybe you should be more open minded and take some of what people are saying into consideration. There is a reason why no other competitive map ever made doesn't look like the one you made, and it's not because the map makers were inferior to you in skill or creativity. Maybe you didn't make the map to be used for competitive play. That is completely fine, but you should state that in the OP so you could avoid some of the criticisms you are receiving.
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 03:05:02
November 10 2010 02:58 GMT
#30
to Omigawa
? i can't be offended, i shovel poup every 8 hours, so i read and awnser

i was just stating that i can handle pissing contests anyday (that is if my kid 'll let me)

i like mapmaking and am prolific
stay tuned for "Knight to king five"

i'll deliver the goods (probably my 13th map will hit a corde)
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
Omigawa
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1556 Posts
November 10 2010 03:09 GMT
#31
On November 10 2010 11:58 baskerville wrote:
to Omigawa
? i can't be offended, i shovel poup every 8 hours, so i read and awnser

i was just stating that i can handle pissing contests anyday (that is if my kid 'll let me)

i like mapmaking and am prolific
stay tuned for "Knight to king five"

i'll deliver the goods (probably my 13th map will hit a corde)


Good luck, fwiw I'm just a bronzie
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 10 2010 09:59 GMT
#32
On November 10 2010 12:09 Omigawa wrote:

Good luck, fwiw I'm just a bronzie


"fwiw", i don't get that, i'm old, bladder control is my thing

" just a bronzie", at least you love the game? that's what matters
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 10 2010 10:28 GMT
#33
On November 10 2010 02:26 -{Cake}- wrote: I personally hate rushes, and love long macro games, but diversity is necessary for creative strategic high level play, meaning, the option should remain viable..., and a big map, with long ground distances and no natural, cuts down on options


try Demonoid Whisper map ("easiest" 3 base ever)
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
cocosoft
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden1068 Posts
November 10 2010 11:54 GMT
#34
On November 09 2010 07:54 baskerville wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2010 07:31 darklordjac wrote:
Wait so a hard natural and very skinny. Basically zergs expos are very hard to get and terrans siege tanks will own everything on the ground

you should never let terran get too many tanks

wtf? haha
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 10 2010 14:08 GMT
#35
On November 10 2010 20:54 cocosoft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2010 07:54 baskerville wrote:
On November 09 2010 07:31 darklordjac wrote:
Wait so a hard natural and very skinny. Basically zergs expos are very hard to get and terrans siege tanks will own everything on the ground

you should never let terran get too many tanks

wtf? haha


what ze fu.k ????
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
November 10 2010 15:01 GMT
#36
--- Nuked ---
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 10 2010 15:07 GMT
#37
lol
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
jhNz
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Germany2762 Posts
November 10 2010 15:09 GMT
#38
i guess the lack of open space on this map will make it basically impossible to win for zerg.
mutalisks are an option, but as soon as the opponent has some decent AA the game is over for the zerg.

t >>> p >> z ... the huge area of effect damage dealers of terran and protoss (storm) will kill any zerg attempts on the ground.
http://twitter.com/jhNz
baskerville
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
541 Posts
November 10 2010 15:15 GMT
#39
On November 11 2010 00:09 jhNz wrote:


t >>> p >> z ... the huge area of effect damage dealers of terran and protoss (storm) will kill any zerg attempts on the ground.


thank you
zat was well typed

have you considered that in the early game t and p cannot wall off in their main...?
http://www.teamliquid.net/mirror/smilies/random-big.gif
LeoTheLion
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
China958 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 15:20:51
November 10 2010 15:20 GMT
#40
On November 11 2010 00:15 baskerville wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 00:09 jhNz wrote:


t >>> p >> z ... the huge area of effect damage dealers of terran and protoss (storm) will kill any zerg attempts on the ground.


thank you
zat was well typed

have you considered that in the early game t and p cannot wall off in their main...?


have you co nsidered that there are 100 hp destructible rocks in the way... ? so it will take time for zergling to get to base?

also have you considered that terran can completely wall off one choke just with barracks... ? and that protoss can do the same with gateways and cyber... ? or even block one choke off with three pylons... ?

also have you considered that it is hard for zerg to get an expansion... ? and one base terran and protoss usually does very well against one base zerg.... ?
Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. -Chairman Mao
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
12:00
Cracov 2025: Qualifier #2
CranKy Ducklings681
IndyStarCraft 342
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 344
IndyStarCraft 342
Hui .209
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4761
Rain 2555
Shuttle 1433
Horang2 1336
EffOrt 956
Bisu 925
Jaedong 739
Hyuk 377
Mini 376
Stork 328
[ Show more ]
TY 297
GuemChi 197
Soma 131
ToSsGirL 121
hero 121
Barracks 96
Hyun 83
Sacsri 78
PianO 55
GoRush 47
Sea.KH 39
Free 28
Terrorterran 17
HiyA 9
ivOry 4
Stormgate
TKL 310
Dota 2
qojqva3595
Fuzer 352
canceldota274
LuMiX1
League of Legends
singsing2833
Counter-Strike
byalli269
edward53
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude54
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor648
Liquid`Hasu424
Other Games
Gorgc3321
B2W.Neo1540
FrodaN1118
ArmadaUGS92
KnowMe67
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1265
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 74
• Adnapsc2 11
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3662
• WagamamaTV781
• Ler138
Upcoming Events
BSL: ProLeague
2h 28m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 18h
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
FEL
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.