EPTDo you like the Legacy of the Void beta so far?
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
sCnInfinity
Germany82 Posts
| ||
|
paddyz
Ireland628 Posts
| ||
|
yoshi245
United States2971 Posts
| ||
|
Gathorisx
United Kingdom27 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + thanks david. | ||
|
Rikudou
Germany151 Posts
i hope blizzard is aware that new units and new mechanics are not the only important things | ||
|
TJ31
630 Posts
| ||
|
dBdHellRider
Sweden63 Posts
 <3 | ||
|
Uni1987
Netherlands642 Posts
| ||
|
The3rdCatalyst
United States4 Posts
| ||
|
dswarm
United States73 Posts
| ||
|
tomastaz
United States976 Posts
On April 02 2015 04:52 sCnInfinity wrote: Not quite sure what to think at this point. Seems really fast paced, which is good. At the same time the new Units look prettty ugly. If that's the only complaint it's pretty damn good! | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
|
LexKaiba
Ireland23 Posts
 | ||
|
mantequilla
Turkey779 Posts
 | ||
|
ReaperSC2
Finland18 Posts
| ||
|
trada
Germany347 Posts
meaning: a successful beta might increase viewership and make SC2 a premiere esports title again, because right now it sure doesnt feel like one. | ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
| ||
|
phodacbiet
United States1740 Posts
On April 09 2015 17:13 Orcasgt24 wrote: Thank god its in early beta. I voted for the funny waiting until Life plays it but it does look terrible. HotS looked awful at the start too so I still have hope Blizzard will get their shit together and make the game good People have been saying that since WoL beta lol. "Come on gais, wol hasnt been out yet! Blizzard will make it good watch!" | ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On April 10 2015 05:09 phodacbiet wrote: People have been saying that since WoL beta lol. "Come on gais, wol hasnt been out yet! Blizzard will make it good watch!" I think WoL and HotS were good. HotS will end terribly if this is indeed the last patch though. Such a shame | ||
|
zaMNal
Mongolia385 Posts
And there must be a reason why C&C is not being played anymore (even the newer ones like C&C 3 and 4 or RA3), while the (much older) likes of Broodwar, Age of Empires and Warcraft are still kicking at some level. | ||
|
MidnightZL
Sweden203 Posts
On April 12 2015 00:46 zaMNal wrote: From what I've read and seen so far, the game now feels even more like Command & Conquer. And there must be a reason why C&C is not being played anymore (even the newer ones like C&C 3 and 4 or RA3), while the (much older) likes of Broodwar, Age of Empires and Warcraft are still kicking at some level. What exactly is like C&C u think, yes its both rts and yes both has tanks i know but what do u mean more exactly. From what ive seen its just faster, more action, you can't just sit around sieging up, u gotta do something or get punished, thats how it should be. Tho there are things that could be better, and it will be, the expansion is just a little child yet, give it some time. | ||
|
Hot_Ice
139 Posts
| ||
|
Trozz
Canada3455 Posts
It does not seem future proof. Hope they prove me wrong. | ||
|
StickyFlower
Sweden68 Posts
| ||
|
klipik12
United States241 Posts
| ||
|
NKexquisite
United States911 Posts
On April 04 2015 02:17 Uni1987 wrote: Where is the option "My beta invite got lost in the mail"? Yeah, strange poll considering most people are not in the beta yet.  | ||
|
ilovegroov
357 Posts
| ||
|
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
Zerg feels really fun now, although it needs some balance changes. The same goes for Terran, and it still has to get a new unit. Protoss got the short end so far, and I'm not sure what they can do to solve it... Still, the disruptor gives a similar sort of randomness as the reaver in terms of destruction. I've also been trying some gateway builds with adepts, twilight council (for the shield upgrade) and DTs/archons, which seem interesting at my mediocre level. You can definitely see they have been trying to reintroduce Broodwar to Starcraft 2. I really hope they will reconsider the economic model (dual harvester along with the reduced minerals could go a long way). | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On April 26 2015 01:12 ilovegroov wrote: I'd like a carefully optimistic option for that poll. You don't consider not gouging your eyes out optimistic? On topic I hate most things about LOTV It makes me gouge out other people's eyes. | ||
|
baabaa101
12 Posts
| ||
|
Mallidon
Scotland557 Posts
On May 05 2015 11:30 baabaa101 wrote: Blizzard Wrecked HOTS because they hate zerg apparently with the last patch. now no top player will ever make a swarmhost again. they may as well just have deleted it from the game. while you're at it Blizzard: here are some other things you can delete from the game: Cyclones, picking up and dropping siege tanks... the carrier interceptor ability... the battlecruiser jump.... widow mines.... basically, any unit that has made the game ridiculous. since you nerfed the swarmhost into oblivion and "supposedly" people there can actually predict the impact of such a patch.. which means blizzard INTENTIONALLY destroyed zerg ability to compete with lategame terran mech and protoss air... and it's pretty obvious that zerg has virtually no chance of winning early game against either race due to nexus cannon and reapers into widow mine respectively.. so zerg has to midgame all in from now on. however, the reality is that the new broken units of LoTV are there to stay, since if Blizzard can't realize how broken they are by now, they never will until it's too late.. there is no way to fix LoTV reasonably without at least nerfing cyclones and drop siege tanks AS MUCH AS SWARMHOSTS, BLIZZARD! that's FAIR. Zerg has hardly been hurt in top tournament representation since the SH nerf, so I'm not sure if you are just trolling or are just struggling to learn to make something else except swarm hosts in your own games? Yes they could do with being looked at again I guess (although they were very good for a long long time, maybe it's just their turn being a bit crap?). For you to suggest that Blizzard 'wrecked HOTS' because of this is a bit ridiculous imo. Also from what I've heard of the LOTV beta, Protoss is by far the weakest race, not Zerg. So basically your suggestions to remove basically EVERY new unit that Terran or Protoss gets is also ridiculous. Edit - Oh and OT = This poll could have done with the 'I'm reserving judgement until I play the beta' option! I voted for the Life option since that was the closest. | ||
|
StatixEx
United Kingdom779 Posts
the second you have 2 bases up however its like hots but you have that urgency to expand cos ur not going to have that income form long, its creating too much to do and when terrans start really abusing drop play and damaging eco, its going to terrans winning all the way to the bank i know this is crazy but could you really fuck it up and have a 6 OR 12 worker start at random? | ||
|
phantomfive
Korea (South)404 Posts
On May 14 2015 04:59 StatixEx wrote: i know this is crazy but could you really fuck it up and have a 6 OR 12 worker start at random? That's a cool idea (as long as both sides start with the same number, of course) | ||
|
orllyfools
United States153 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
| ||
