EPTCome on, don't be stupid like last game this is fucking see through EASY.
Mafia VIII [GG] - Page 56
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Come on, don't be stupid like last game this is fucking see through EASY. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
No you didn't work with Mynock and Ver to get voted in. No there wasn't a hueg voteswing to you day 1. No YOU weren't the one that coined the term 'three musketeers' to cement the solidarity between you three. No you didn't defend both mynock and ver until day 2 started. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On May 18 2009 03:28 Ace wrote: Look at all the wrong shit in this post, oh gee I don't know where to start. 1.) You haven't been logical. Period. Your arguments about Pardoner are null and void because we can't determine anyone's roles yet. Duh. So your asking the town to vote in a way that is pretty much useless. All we can do is vote on ability which unfortunately leaves a lot of people out. 2.) nemy isn't in office. If I was worried about losing the election that bad of all people why would I go after nemy? Or you know, I could just take my vote off of mynock and abstain or vote for someone else. Duh? Your analysis is complete shit, try again. 3.) I'm supporting Mynock and Ver because I feel they are the other 2 best candidates. Every game we have people like you who question why I'm doing something, and you all come off looking like idiots. How many times do I have to tell you - you're wasting time. Maybe I just genuinely believe those 2 are good for the town and holy shit! They might be mafia but they haven't acted like you or nemy so I have no reason to fuck with them. 4.) That's nice that 1 of the 3 of us might be mafia. It's also nice that 6 out of the 30 people playing might be also. What's your point? 5.) There is no danger to me. Stop trying so hard. There is no mafia coveted Pardoner spot - any of the 2 will do. Stop making up these grand ideas in your head. 6.) Your "ifs" are wrong because none of us play this game like you. It shows. 7.) I don't know exactly what time I started reading the thread or exactly what time I went to bed. But if you want to dissect it till your blue in the face go ahead - I'm innocent and don't have to worry about anything. See unlike nemy, I haven't lied about anything. And unlike you I'm actually analyzing whats going on now and not some made up scenario that we have no control over. Got anything else you want to uselessly add to the thread? Any more lightweight accusations you want to make against The Three Musketeers? Yeah, completely independant. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Once again get your facts straight and stop trying to force my lynch. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Not supporting them? Not making your entire day 1 post content about how Ver/You/Mynock need to get office? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 20 2009 15:56 L wrote: My plan is perfectly logical. Keep lashing out mr cool cucumber. No you didn't work with Mynock and Ver to get voted in. No there wasn't a hueg voteswing to you day 1. No YOU weren't the one that coined the term 'three musketeers' to cement the solidarity between you three. No you didn't defend both mynock and ver until day 2 started. so because people vote for me based on my compelling posts to get myself elected that means I'm automatically fishy? Ummm. no. It woul be SMARTER if you actually looked at the voters first instead of trying to lynch me as lynching me tells you absolutely nothing. So let's see: 1.) Wrong about me working with Mynock and Ver to get voted in 2.) Wrong about me causing a suspicious voteswing as if it came out of no where 3.) Acting as if coining the term "The three Musketeers" is automatically cause for creating a Mafia coalition 4.) Of course I defended both of them - from retarded assumptions because like I said before We did not have enough information. Obviously with both Bodyguards dying on that night it would make sense for me to have an argument huh? Yea, you sure are playing this smart huh? If the town even goes through with this they definitely get dunce caps handed all around. And yea, go ahead and try to lynch any but dreamflower. I'm gonna pardon them because right now your making no sense and are acting more mafiaish than anyone with the exception of Ver and Nemy, and of course dreamflower who voted for me in one more move for the books. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 20 2009 16:13 L wrote: How would you work to get someone into office, then? Not supporting them? Not making your entire day 1 post content about how Ver/You/Mynock need to get office? How does that equal working WITH them? Explain doofus. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
How does that equal working WITH them? Explain doofus. How doesn't it? Rofl. SMARTER if you actually looked at the voters I did, you have a total of 1 person who didn't switch votes under your list and they voteswang you. Not fishy at all. [quoite]So let's see: 1.) Wrong about me working with Mynock and Ver to get voted in 2.) Wrong about me causing a suspicious voteswing as if it came out of no where 3.) Acting as if coining the term "The three Musketeers" is automatically cause for creating a Mafia coalition[/quote] So lets see 1. Right about you working with mynock and Ver. 2. Right about you having a suspicious voteswing to your name. 3. I never said coining the term made it happen, it was the crystallization of a larger trend of co-operation. And yea, go ahead and try to lynch any but dreamflower. I'm gonna pardon them because right now your making no sense and are acting more mafiaish than anyone with the exception of Ver and Nemy This is why we're killing you first, silly, so you don't have this wacky mafia controlled pardon ability : ). Thanks for proving my point, Mr cool cucumber. COOLACECUCUMBER, please be happier when you post. Like me : D | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On May 18 2009 04:02 Mynock wrote: I'll try to be as reasonable as I can here, and just address the L issue briefly. L, to make it a bit more clear, the problem both Ace (I think) and I have here, is that you're dealing with some virtual Mafia game's Day 7, while we're actually trying to address the issues of here and now. And your constant paranoia and shouting does get a bit tiresome. I understand your position and your concerns, but I just don't feel they're as valid and of such high priority to deal with them extensively. That aside, there is one point I agree with you on, and that is the upstart of a Mafia Mayor as quickly as possible. However, out of the leading candidates, that only applies to Ver. I have been wondering myself where Ver could have gone, because he's made virtually no input after his initial campaining and a brief cameo after nemY RCed (granted, his campaigning put him in a comfortable spot, but still...). If Ver is out there and active, I'd like to hear his take on this matter. Mynock clearly not working along side you to marginalize me. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On May 18 2009 03:55 Ace wrote: Oh snap L fails at reading again, and now tries to put the loss of the Town last game on me. I love this shit. 1.) Obviously determining roles is the aim of the game - but we are still at Mayoral elections. None of us can determine anything right now. Oh shit how did you miss this? You even quoted it but read it wrong. 2.) Worried about the election != worried about nemy. I'd love to be in, but hey if Mynock and Ver made it can't say I'd be sad. I'm not that worried about the election. But yea your right - I am worried about nemy which is exactly why I've been making my case against him. 3.) circular collusion? lol ok Don King. Ver has been pretty much silent, and only myself and Mynock have really supported each other. Stop trying to take wild guesses. 4.) I am immune from scrutiny. Because I'm innocent so anything you try to come at me with just doesn't phase me. If you caught me lying or bullshitting I'd understand but I never have. You know, thats how most of the good players that play know when I'm innocent. 5.) It wasn't proven false. How would you know the Mafia covet the Pardoner spot unless they themselves stated it? Once again you're failing. 6.) It's an US statement because playing the game with Ver and Mynock so many times I KNOW none of us play the game like you. It's just that simple - nothing beyond that. 7.) What full disclosure is there to give? But since you want to - go ahead. Post this evidence. You'll see I went to sleep, woke up, and came on TL.net after playing DOTA. Clan chat, replays - post whatever you need to. I know I'm not mafia so I'm begging you to do what you have to in order to "prove" I'm lying. I wasn't dodging but since you said I was I'm here for the show. So go ahead champ, show us what you got. Supporting mynock/ver again. You 'KNOW' how they play, but now believe Ver is mafia. Nice prediction skills. Etc. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On May 20 2009 16:39 L wrote: I can go on, there are plenty of other posts which show you working together with the two mentioned in order to try and put forth the same argument. You working with Ver/Mynock isn't 100% grounds for guilt, but the way you're taking it as a death threat indicates that I've hit oil and you're going to keep gushing for me. ... that's gotta be one of the stupidest things i've read today | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Go to search on the top left of the TL interface, put in whatever, then go search advanced by limiting results to content by Ace and picking Mynock or Ver as the subject field. It will give you a list of all of his posts where he mentions the person stated. I will make a picture. | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On May 20 2009 16:47 L wrote: I made a super general argument because there's a LOOOOOOOOOOOOT of material. Go to search on the top left of the TL interface, put in whatever, then go search advanced by limiting results to content by Ace and picking Mynock or Ver as the subject field. It will give you a list of all of his posts where he mentions the person stated. I will make a picture. good for you | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/6190/pictureforthemafiagame.jpg) | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
if you try that on me for Ver you get the exact same thing. By your reasoning, I'm as guilty as Ver because I mentioned his name in a post. Are you fucking stupid? Just because someone's name appears in a post doesn't mean jack shit. If you look up "L" and "Ver" or "Ace" you'll get lots of posts. This is a very poor way to do this shit. In fact this entire lynching the mayoral candidates is just stupid. The BGs? Do you really think they pmed somebody? We only have one traitor, not seven? Has town lost their fucking minds? | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
happy reading mon ami :3 | ||
| ||
