[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 55

On February 07 2017 18:22 Vivax wrote:


Sharkies last vote is a wifom vote btw (ie he wants to gain cred from it if the mission fails).

If it passes, disregard.

On February 07 2017 18:22 RtaniSoul wrote:
I can still see a Superbia/Vivax/EC world as that'd explain the day1 nay votes and with the arguments you've made by then it'd have been hard to justify a day 2 pro-vote, plus with thread sentiment going in favour it seems likely it would pass anyway, but yeah, that's just one team. It does seem likely at least one of you would be town.

On February 07 2017 18:22 Vivax wrote:


Sharkies last vote is a wifom vote btw (ie he wants to gain cred from it if the mission fails).

If it passes, disregard.

On February 07 2017 18:23 Superbia wrote:


This is probably the only possible team. But even then, the likelihood of every town voting yes is absurd.

On February 07 2017 18:22 sharkie wrote:




So spies are smart enough to put two of them into the team but not smart enough to delay failing a mission in order to put even more blame on me? Like you said if the first mission passes and the second mission fails the only LOGICAL spy would be me. But gods forsake that spies could use that exact same train of thought you had as their strategy?

Are the spies dumb or smart? You need to stick to one scenario... I don't see how one thing can be a "good strategy for spies" but the other is "no way spies would not fail the first mission)... You really really make it very easy for you, don't you?
Also you seem to be very sure that this mission is going to fail and that I am the spy with RT.

So why did you approve the team in the first place? Just send yourself and TW and go for an easy win?

On February 07 2017 18:17 Superbia wrote:
I don't understand sharkie's play at all btw.

50% of the times he knows what he's doing, like voting no on the prev mission and making the big post.

50% of the times he says dumb shit like "ec and sup are 100% mafia because they voted against the team that passed!"

On February 07 2017 18:17 Superbia wrote:
I don't understand sharkie's play at all btw.

50% of the times he knows what he's doing, like voting no on the prev mission and making the big post.

50% of the times he says dumb shit like "ec and sup are 100% mafia because they voted against the team that passed!"

On February 07 2017 18:25 RtaniSoul wrote:

I feel like he's just a smart guy that didn't have experience and is picking shit up. It's not like he's still being clueless but you can see that he doesn't know how to interpret certain situations. Throughout all his analysis you can very clearly follow why he's doing what he's doing.

Why do you feel this transition is unnatural?

On February 07 2017 18:25 sharkie wrote:


You make me fume?!

I explained earlier why I voted no in this mission! Has nothing to do with anything except gathering information...

On February 07 2017 18:26 Superbia wrote:


He's said multiple times he's played resistance before. Pretty sure.

On February 07 2017 18:28 RtaniSoul wrote:

Live resistance, not forum resistance. Whole different ballgame.

On February 07 2017 18:28 sharkie wrote:


Yes at that point in time I truly believed that. I still think that one of you is a spy 100%. But that both of you are a spy is very unlikely now.

On February 07 2017 18:29 Superbia wrote:


Only partially. I would say town is better on the forum if town is willing to play it slow.

On February 07 2017 18:16 RtaniSoul wrote:

You're only seeing it from your perspective again. I am not certain on grack and yourself. I'm telling you to look at it from my perspective and figure out how it all makes sense from me being town, but you're too tunneled on your tinfoil theory.

On February 07 2017 18:33 RtaniSoul wrote:

That's not the point. In a live setting it's more about reading faces and stupid shit like that. Forum has far, far more analysis in much deeper ways.

On February 07 2017 18:35 Vivax wrote:


Have it your way then.

As team leader, I put a spy into the team. He lets it pass cause he'd be at risk if it fails.

Everyone agrees on same team + previous leader.

I request to take out the previous spy and replace it with you as resistance. Denied.

If the team fails, as resistance you would know exactly who to blame: Me. Nobody is so bullheaded to not acknowledge that Grack and swika are simply town. Spies will only let a mission pass if they know that it will get them excluded for the rest of the game.

During nomination phase, we all agreed on swika and Grack, and I even asked you who you think should be the third. You said: Sharkie or yourself. I chose sharkie.

When I make a suggestion very similar to your previous one, where one of the three is someone you suggested previously, this happens:
You refuse cuz being afraid of being on a failing team, which btw isn't in line with your thoughts on sharkie so far.