|
On October 07 2016 07:10 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:56 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:53 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:52 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:49 Calix wrote:
Actually my point is that your recent explanation doesn't mesh well with your stated reasoning at the time. It fucking does. What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is?
Who are you to tell me my vote sucked, lol?
If I voted Palmar, the problem would have been the same. I did not scum-read Palmar. My vote on HF was meaningless because it was the only one on him. I had to choose between two players I do not scum-read. Of course the vote was going to be bad. Nice job taking my vote out of context.
Yeah, you're fucking bad. This push is bad. (You claim that my vote doesn't match my reads, while you are pushing one of your scum-reads. That is some really nice play.)
I said that you never listened to anybody else. That applies to every game I've seen you play. It's either your lynch or fuck off. The better players' opinion does not matter.
I have explained myself.
|
One of your town-reads* obviously
|
On October 07 2016 07:17 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 07:10 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:56 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:53 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:52 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:49 Calix wrote:
Actually my point is that your recent explanation doesn't mesh well with your stated reasoning at the time. It fucking does. What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is? Who are you to tell me my vote sucked, lol? If I voted Palmar, the problem would have been the same. I did not scum-read Palmar. My vote on HF was meaningless because it was the only one on him. I had to choose between two players I do not scum-read. Of course the vote was going to be bad. Nice job taking my vote out of context. Yeah, you're fucking bad. This push is bad. (You claim that my vote doesn't match my reads, while you are pushing one of your scum-reads. That is some really nice play.) I said that you never listened to anybody else. That applies to every game I've seen you play. It's either your lynch or fuck off. The better players' opinion does not matter. I have explained myself.
"Your vote was worse so my awful contradiction doesn't mean anything!"
You still have not explained how "I don't scum-read him" and "he scum-claimed" make any sense. Your response is just you whining about how you JUST HAD TO CHOOSE between two town-reads when you could have easily voted for a third wagon and push that? lol
HF was being considered as an option and had a brief spurt of votes on him iirc. You have no excuse to not even try and get a wagon on him going. It wasn't like anyone really town-read him at that point.
You realise that your continued discrediting of someone you town-read is extremely anti-town and only helps the scum do their job by tearing down a town voice, right? It hasn't escaped my notice that most of your posts have the words "Calix is bad/ retarded" which is excessive even for you.
The fact that you started renewing your "Calix sucks" tirade once I said that I find your vote scummy (in the same post where you fail to explain it, rofl) speaks volumes.
|
Not even getting into how you picked the person you actively town-read over someone who you have only said is "not scummy" lmao.
|
On October 07 2016 07:23 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 07:17 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:10 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:56 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:53 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:52 NeverUnlucky wrote:
[quote]
It fucking does.
What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is? Who are you to tell me my vote sucked, lol? If I voted Palmar, the problem would have been the same. I did not scum-read Palmar. My vote on HF was meaningless because it was the only one on him. I had to choose between two players I do not scum-read. Of course the vote was going to be bad. Nice job taking my vote out of context. Yeah, you're fucking bad. This push is bad. (You claim that my vote doesn't match my reads, while you are pushing one of your scum-reads. That is some really nice play.) I said that you never listened to anybody else. That applies to every game I've seen you play. It's either your lynch or fuck off. The better players' opinion does not matter. I have explained myself. "Your vote was worse so my awful contradiction doesn't mean anything!"
You actually have zero self-conscience. This is a complete twist of what I said.
You still have not explained how "I don't scum-read him" and "he scum-claimed" make any sense. Your response is just you whining about how you JUST HAD TO CHOOSE between two town-reads when you could have easily voted for a third wagon and push that? lol
I said, "I think that was a scum-claim." I was not convinced it was one myself, and I did explain why I thought it was one. He had a town tone and I stated it. That was why I did not scum-read him.
When I placed my vote, I had to go to class. I was not in a position to push for a third wagon.
HF was being considered as an option and had a brief spurt of votes on him iirc. You have no excuse to not even try and get a wagon on him going. It wasn't like anyone really town-read him at that point.
Yeah, you don't rc. He had batsnacks and Palmar's votes and that was after I voted batsnacks. He was not ever considered an option before by other players than me.
I had an excuse.
You realise that your continued discrediting of someone you town-read is extremely anti-town and only helps the scum do their job by tearing down a town voice, right? It hasn't escaped my notice that most of your posts have the words "Calix is bad/ retarded" which is excessive even for you.
Most of my posts? Not. Maybe a sixth of my posts has "X is bad".
You are doing a great job of tearing down your own voice.
You don't know me. You cannot judge what is excessive for me and what is not. And I never called you or anybody retarded.
The fact that you started renewing your "Calix sucks" tirade once I said that I find your vote scummy (in the same post where you fail to explain it, rofl) speaks volumes.
If you think that this is a good push, you are fucking atrocious. And when did I stop the "Calix is bad" thing? Never.
|
On October 07 2016 07:27 Calix wrote:
Not even getting into how you picked the person you actively town-read over someone who you have only said is "not scummy" lmao.
I did explain this. I had reasons to doubt my BS read while I did not have any reason to sr Plamar (other than the modkill post).
|
I am town and would rather spend my time watching my movies/looking at the scummy players' filter than arguing with Mrs. Ego.
|
Calix, you saying something is scummy has no real meaning. It's just a weasel word.
|
On October 07 2016 07:35 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 07:23 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:17 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:10 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 07:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:56 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 06:53 Calix wrote:
[quote]
Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is? Who are you to tell me my vote sucked, lol? If I voted Palmar, the problem would have been the same. I did not scum-read Palmar. My vote on HF was meaningless because it was the only one on him. I had to choose between two players I do not scum-read. Of course the vote was going to be bad. Nice job taking my vote out of context. Yeah, you're fucking bad. This push is bad. (You claim that my vote doesn't match my reads, while you are pushing one of your scum-reads. That is some really nice play.) I said that you never listened to anybody else. That applies to every game I've seen you play. It's either your lynch or fuck off. The better players' opinion does not matter. I have explained myself. "Your vote was worse so my awful contradiction doesn't mean anything!" You actually have zero self-conscience. This is a complete twist of what I said. Show nested quote +You still have not explained how "I don't scum-read him" and "he scum-claimed" make any sense. Your response is just you whining about how you JUST HAD TO CHOOSE between two town-reads when you could have easily voted for a third wagon and push that? lol I said, "I think that was a scum-claim." I was not convinced it was one myself, and I did explain why I thought it was one. He had a town tone and I stated it. That was why I did not scum-read him. When I placed my vote, I had to go to class. I was not in a position to push for a third wagon. Show nested quote +HF was being considered as an option and had a brief spurt of votes on him iirc. You have no excuse to not even try and get a wagon on him going. It wasn't like anyone really town-read him at that point.
Yeah, you don't rc. He had batsnacks and Palmar's votes and that was after I voted batsnacks. He was not ever considered an option before by other players than me. I had an excuse. Show nested quote +You realise that your continued discrediting of someone you town-read is extremely anti-town and only helps the scum do their job by tearing down a town voice, right? It hasn't escaped my notice that most of your posts have the words "Calix is bad/ retarded" which is excessive even for you. Most of my posts? Not. Maybe a sixth of my posts has "X is bad". You are doing a great job of tearing down your own voice. You don't know me. You cannot judge what is excessive for me and what is not. And I never called you or anybody retarded. Show nested quote +The fact that you started renewing your "Calix sucks" tirade once I said that I find your vote scummy (in the same post where you fail to explain it, rofl) speaks volumes. If you think that this is a good push, you are fucking atrocious. And when did I stop the "Calix is bad" thing? Never.
Zero self-conscience...relevant.
That doesn't make any sense. If you think it sounded townie then it's not a scum claim. You cannot think someone legitimately scum-claimed yet think they have town-tone. I cannot imagine reading that batsnacks post, thinking "he scum-claimed in a townie way" and then voting him while not-scumreading him...that's a complete mess of a vote.
I see nothing here that shows that batsnacks was ever a better vote in your eyes compared to Palmar or Holyflare.
That's proving my point of there being existing support for a HF wagon. You vote and hope for a CFD? lmao, if you really thought that both wagons sucked then you wouldn't implicitly support them by jumping on the bandwagon.
Why do you need an excuse for your 100% valid vote? xD
You don't deny that you're discrediting a town-read, you just try to downplay how much you do it and then push it back onto me. This is a typical deflection tactic of yours - deny the act and blame the other person for doing it. That tells me that your intent is to intentionally discredit my posts.
|
|
|
It's hilarious that your response to this push is to double down on the discrediting. Brilliant.
|
|
|
Given that you just town-cleared me by shitty NKA and have called me obvious town all game, you can't back-track on that and call me scum so your next bet is to just call me terrible instead.
Not your best move, sweetheart.
|
Somebody NEEDS to discredit you for Christ's sake. You are pushing town and think you are doing fine.
|
Why would I call you scum? You're obv. town, and I am not bad.
|
On October 07 2016 07:52 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Somebody NEEDS to discredit you for Christ's sake. You are pushing town and think you are doing fine.
I'm town. The only people who NEED to discredit me are the scum. You are either helping them or you're scum yourself. I don't think you're that retarded so scum is the only option left.
Town who think someone is misguided would try to persuade them. You've just insulted me the entire game and then insult me more when I (obviously) don't listen to you.
|
Also, I fucking hard-claimed to you D1. Do you think I would do this as scum?
|
On October 07 2016 06:20 Calix wrote:
But yeah, my play this game is reminding me of other games I've had where I was totally wrong and was basically honorary mafia by pushing mislynches all game long so I'm just going to take a step back now BEFORE I reach that point.
##vote Palmar
|
The story repeats itself.
|
Strong arguments. I'm convinced by the very person who has admitted to trying to discredit town-reads and who has spent a considerable amount of time doing so.
That's clearly scum-motivated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
