EPTI have just explained it.
[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 89
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
I have just explained it. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:47 NeverUnlucky wrote: I said that I thought that he had scum-claimed in the thread. You even questioned it. I have just explained it. At EoD* Your whole point is that my read on Bats changed when it did not. | ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:35 Calix wrote: Question. May we have links to Night 1/ Day 2 in the OP? Added to the OP. Missed it, my bad again. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:40 NeverUnlucky wrote: To add to marv's points on Plam - Plamar said that I should have been modkilled day 1 for trying to abuse the game mechanics. This would only favor mafia. That's his one post that made me think he is mafia. Pretty sure that this is NAI but keep let's keep piling on! | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:49 Calix wrote: Actually my point is that your recent explanation doesn't mesh well with your stated reasoning at the time. It fucking does. What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:52 NeverUnlucky wrote: It fucking does. What is the relevance of your point? Unless you think I am mafia with Plamar, you are going nowhere. Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:53 Calix wrote: Who said anything about Palmar? I just asked about your batsnacks vote on its own, my dude. Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote: Which raises the question: What is the relevance of your point? It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:56 Calix wrote: It's obvious that I think your vote is bad and I'm prying into your stated reasoning vs what you've said before and how they don't actually make sense together. Doesn't take a genius to pick up on that one, pal. They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote: They make sense together... they're the same. So it has no relevance. You have no follow-up on this. Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote: What do y'all make of HF's death? I think it further clears Calix from being mafia because the "code" I was talking about stated that I had a veteran read on HF (I had not read the veteran role, so I thought a veteran killed the visitors when he decides to go on alert. I thought his whole "I will shoot Calix" narrative was a vet bait because of that.). If Calix was mafia, I do not think she would have NKed HF knowing this. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:03 Calix wrote: Saying you don't scum-read someone who you think scum-claimed is not the same. Instead of properly explaining your thought process here so that I can understand it better, you're just trying to shut down this line of conversation by calling it 'irrelevant'. You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:04 NeverUnlucky wrote: I think it further clears Calix from being mafia because the "code" I was talking about stated that I had a veteran read on HF (I had not read the veteran role, so I thought a veteran killed the visitors when he decides to go on alert. I thought his whole "I will shoot Calix" narrative was a vet bait because of that.). If Calix was mafia, I do not think she would have NKed HF knowing this. Although she did not agree with that read. Hmm. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Veteran is a protective role. It can be roleblocked and killed because Consort is a guaranteed role. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:08 Calix wrote: You're seriously trying to say that you didn't read the setup? Veteran is a protective role. It can be roleblocked and killed because Consort is a guaranteed role. I did read the setup. Just not the veteran description as I thought it was a standard veteran. Like again, what is the relevance of this? You don't even sr me. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 07 2016 07:06 NeverUnlucky wrote: You have yet to show me how this point is relevant, lmao. I don't see any follow-up coming my way. Nice evasion of explaining your contradictory vote. Your vote sucks. You voted for someone that you didn't scum-read and later claimed that he scum-claimed. This was on town. You then try having your cake and eating it too by going "told you so LOL Calix, you so bad, should have listened to me sooner!" and now you refuse to explain yourself. Need me to spoon-feed you any further on how scummy that is? | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
| ||
