TL Mafia LXXIV: Storm Mafia 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
TLDR As of yet, nothing worth acting on outside of concert with more proof. TLDR for TLDR stuff is stuff | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 07:55 Superbia wrote: Who is parabola. Meant you XD mah bad | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 07:55 Superbia wrote: Also who are your team mates? Not sure yet, game just started / : | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 07:59 Superbia wrote: I encourage everyone to follow my voting pattern this game. Starting with my first vote. Beetlejuice | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:07 sicklucker wrote: I also agree that talking about slam is very scummy. I have never really tried to read him esp this early! beetlejuice On damdred, just went through most of his scum games, he never really goes looking for information this early on in said games / : in his town games he seems to actively hunt (when he manages to actually make it for day 1) skimmed about 8 games to come to this conclusion (five scum 3 town) Also theres a fair share of enthusiasm in his tone, something kinda hard to feign while actively fishing. From the lens of what little I know about him now, he probs town. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:18 Damdred wrote: Here's the thing super, I care about you but I don't care about what you have done up to that point. Slam seems to care about something which I'm curious about. Besides that gum can you expand more on your post maybe? You say a few words that seem to call me null but fail to inquire about me or really do anything but ramble a long time and do nothing. So wow me or the storm will be your resting point today. And koshi won't complain in a palmar game lol. my key point on you awaited more information which I went and got : P | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:07 sicklucker wrote: I also agree that talking about slam is very scummy. I have never really tried to read him esp this early! Who are you agreeing with? | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:20 Superbia wrote: Opens up with a try-hard post which concludes nothing (feels pressured to show towniness- mafia trait). Then 180 switch and troll response to my pressure. Shows disingenuous state of mind. Beetlejuice! oks, 1: I ALWAYS open up with a try hard post as town : P I read into a little a lot and a lot a ton. I can provide older posts of mine regarding this point / : (this an argument I have almost every game so its ok im used to it) and if you arent willing to consider my habits as a player, your not doing everything you can to catch scum (or blah blah omgbus as alternative) 2: You gave me a troll question and I gave you a troll answer / : 3: Are you just coming after me cause your bored and feel something needs to happen cause mafia? Or do you genuinely value your own ideals of what scumminess is (ie try hard) over the reality of how each individual actually plays? | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:23 LightningStrike wrote: I here I forgot this game had started. I kinda dislike this post. He said Slam not acting liking like his normal semi troll trot yet said he never plays with him? Unless talking about pregame then how would he know how slam acts like? I have played with Slam 0_0 just not in a long time. The slam I know is kind of a derpy fellow, here he is being helpful. Hence noteworthy. If you wanna see that as malevolent crumbing then I feel your projecting a smidge / : | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
Well you wanted to get the game started, which is a baseline townie mind set, casting the first vote this early when evi is pretty vague and your case is fairly shallow implies a fair share of courage, as you could easily be jumped on for a weak case this early. Which if your town you could even want as that helps you find scum potentially. You also seem to care what I think (at least seemingly) which isnt what scum trying to bury a townie early would want. From a scum perspective its a big play and heat you dont need. Your experienced so this would be borderline reckless mastery rather than blunder. Last game I was in had a spymaster but he was rather timid early and overall that case seems far less likely from a perspective of ideal play. TLDR your probs town / : | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:31 LightningStrike wrote: Superbia don't you think it's a little early for a vote? Also I had decided to explore the TL Database and long a behold gumshoe is a vet O_o | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:38 Shapelog wrote: Really do not care for self meta or meta in general. I look at database thou. LS didn't help my likeness for meta. 3 sounds semi-attackish based off tone. get over that, it matters a ton, it's a tool at your disposal you should always consider if perhaps with a fair share of skepticism. 3 WAS semi atakish : P im a very emotional player, which you would know if you knew mah meta : P | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:42 Superbia wrote: Okay. Did you reach this conclusion before you made the first post in this quote chain? This one + Show Spoiler + On March 24 2016 08:28 gumshoe wrote: Beetlejuice! oks, 1: I ALWAYS open up with a try hard post as town : P I read into a little a lot and a lot a ton. I can provide older posts of mine regarding this point / : (this an argument I have almost every game so its ok im used to it) and if you arent willing to consider my habits as a player, your not doing everything you can to catch scum (or blah blah omgbus as alternative) 2: You gave me a troll question and I gave you a troll answer / : 3: Are you just coming after me cause your bored and feel something needs to happen cause mafia? Or do you genuinely value your own ideals of what scumminess is (ie try hard) over the reality of how each individual actually plays? Not really? That post was an emotional one, not logical. I usually respond very early to insults/accusations and get caught up in them so this game I made a rule where I would wait for at least three accusations (ie beetlejuice) and in the meantime look elsewhere for clues(damdreds history in this case). That response was sort of just me chomping on the bit wanting to get mah piece out there / : I regarded you as hostile null at the time of it. Only when you asked me specifically what I imagined about you did I gather my thoughts and come to what I deemed an impartial conclusion. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:51 Superbia wrote: I am conflicted. 3: Are you just coming after me cause your bored and feel something needs to happen cause mafia? Or do you genuinely value your own ideals of what scumminess is (ie try hard) over the reality of how each individual actually plays? is straight up thought process evaluation from the POV where I'm town. How is this possible when you had no town read on me yet? read earlier in that very post and if you arent willing to consider my habits as a player, your not doing everything you can to catch scum (or blah blah omgbus as alternative) the whole notion of accusing someone because they are accusing you is hardlined into my brain as a dumb one. Which is why when I speak to someone whose accusing me I like to think thier town that I can convince rather than mafia because if they are mafia I have no real objectivity. But that bit there is present to indicate that yes, at the time I was open to you bieng scum / : so no need for confliction on this acount. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 08:52 Kurumi wrote: What was the meaning of this post? What the hell is "Won't lynch right now Mafia" - is there any case where you don't lynch a Mafia I am missing? Why do you need the "Confirmed" spoiler if the confirmation comes from the host through flips and the updated player list? Is the reason you made that list is that Mafia has a cheatsheet for shots? Nothing good can come from this. I highly dislike this type of lists, especially that you have not commented on what is going to happen with it. This post gave me so many rubs in such bad ways that I just can't let it go. a) The comment on Slam: Not only it's absolutely unnecessary, it ends with "Well, I shouldn't bring it up because it's bad" - so why bother? You know it is bad and you still do it. I mean, I guess you want people to focus on that for some reason, but I'd rather focus on you. Also, if Chezinu Rule is to be trusted, we may have another testament to this. b) Damdred's fishing. Not only I have not seen anything of that nature till that post, but also we are met with a statement that "fishing is to be expected of either side". Oh boy, no, not at all. Fishing for roles is not something you expect from either side. Fishing is Mafia's job. I highly dislike the attempt to paint it as ambiguous. I also do not understand why would you bring attention to any odd words in a person's post. If that's a crumb, you don't want Mafia to see it. Odd wording - go ahead, it might be a slip. But random, seemingly non-related words? No way. c) Read on Superbia. Another read straight outta fortune teller. Why would you, gumshoe, try to paint Superbia as suspicious? At the point of posting that, the only thing Superbia has said about himself was that "you should care about him", which pretty much goes contrary to your point about him not wanting anyone on his tail. d) You end your post saying that it is not really worth much, but you managed to paint Superbia scum, excuse Damdred non-existant fishing and point out that pointing out Slam's behaviour at this stage of the game does more harm than good. You note that people might be excited about something, that they look for something, but you seem not to look for anything. You created a mid-sized post detailing less than a page of a game for nothing, what you admit, but you would not have done that if it really was nothing, so what is your agenda behind that post? 1: There is no real substance insofar in game hence there is no real substance to the post / : 2: I am self admittedly terrible at fishing, every atempt I have made to fish has ended in disaster because the truth is I am natural bait without a modicum of effort and said effort usually casts me too far into the jaws to escape. So I dont fish except on holidays which limits my early game contribtion 3:my post isnt trying to acomplish anything really / : its a look into my thought process which I usually commit to thread as a matter of course. 4: If you think I posted because I felt pressured to post, your not wrong, I want to play and engage with others, not lurk, if what I have to offer on page two of the game isnt up to par, my apologies / : there are no real accusations because there are no evident scum, only thoughts on play and considerations for the future. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 09:04 LightningStrike wrote: It was a indirect reference. and of course the fishy bit of assuming why someone was making an acusation and passing off that assumption as fact / : perhaps fishing for the actual reasoning or trying to come off as a kindred mind. It's quite peculiar to me. 50 50 scum for sure. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 09:12 LightningStrike wrote: 50 50 scum on me or sicklucker? It was a post referencing you indirectly by sicklucker. I know, I was refrencing sicklucker. I think it's bizzare that your defending me with us having never played together before 0_0 a rare ocaison indeed. I would award townie points but hard to be objective about potential pocket monsters. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 09:16 Kurumi wrote: 1. Then why did you try to make it look like there is any substance to your post? 2. Okay, but how is that a reply to my point about fishing being mafia-sided? Or that you are accusing Damdred of it, while he has not done that? 3. It does seem more of a process of incriminating others than your thought process. I see more accusations in this post than analysis. 4. Fine. There are many ways to enter a game. Making a post like this is not a town-way of entering the game. One this is to be pressured to post, another is to be pressured to post something of substance. Mafia is more prone to feel the second pressure, which I think your post has shown - it might look like it has substance, but under a second of thought it turns out to only look like it. Thanks. Still, out of gumshoe's terrible post he decides that talking about Slam is the biggest indicator of gumshoe being scum? Where's the explanation sicklucker?! I disagree that talking about Slam is an indicator of being scum (in this case) - the way gumshoe has talked about Slam is an indicator of being scum. Huge difference. I dont like how your kinda setting up on both sides of the fence (ie it's unlikely me and sick are both scum) feels like your priming a lynch set up / : as for your points 1: I didnt try, that shit came out in like 40 seconds-a min. All my posts are basically like that / : im not trying to inject substance, thats just my post style regardless of the actual content. 2: early game fishing is neutral as both sides needs information to act. So frankly I disagree with you. 3: you youself said theres no substance, thats because theres very little in the way of acusations. Read it again, I consider there posts from both perspectives, thats all, cant help it if people project / : 4: its my way of entering a game, so my apologies if thats a hindrance. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 09:20 LightningStrike wrote: You mean pokemon(i know it's pocket monsters in japan but it doesn't settle well with the US kids stations). Also I am story of mah thug life. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
Where's the explanation sicklucker?! I disagree that talking about Slam is an indicator of being scum (in this case) - the way gumshoe has talked about Slam is an indicator of being scum. Huge difference. just voted for Kurumi, but yeah my primary problem is she is pursuing two reads that are fairly opposed without a hint of reservation regarding that conflict. From a townie perspective those two reads would clash and be worthy of note in provided logic, but it hasnt even occured to Kurumi insofar. What seems more likely is she just doesnt want to draw atention to the Janus nature of her current logic, a setup that favours an outcome for scum wherein I and lick are both town. it feels like an opinion born of machinations rather then genuine perspective. Poisened at it's root with contradiction. (ok now I'll go out.... ON A HIGH NOTE) I opinion born of machinations rather then genuine perspective. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 09:54 Superbia wrote: Town Slam Shapelog Leaning town Sicklucker Lightningstrike Ritoky (slight) Leaning mafia gumshoe Something like that. Feel like I'm forgetting someone. Rest is null. Actually not 100% confident in my reads atm (90%) but might be because I'm tired. Or you know, because your going after a guy who characterisically makes dumb posts day for making a dumb post day 1 -_- also as for Kurumi how do you feel about her scum reading me and lick? How likely is it that we are scum together? If you made a similar accusation would you make note of that conflict? | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 10:01 Vivax wrote: Kinda leaning town for this post cause of the first sentence. It has a bit to do with association, but it's the fact that it's a pretty dickish thing to say to someone I think is town. It's a weak read however, Damdy is far from a firm spot in the readbook. The bolded is a bit suspicious to me cause it's like gummy is trying to tell us how much work he has done to reach his conclusion, which is something he would do to reach a favourable impression. There's also the possibility he wants to give it some sort of statistical reliability which is what he will claim when confronted with this but I believe it's not a townie thing to say, combined with his previous post. LS said it was too early for a vote on gum before even reading his first post? Not cool. Wanting to lend credence to what one is saying is not scummy / : it is simply human. As for why I added that, in my first post about Damdred i mentioned I would need to lean on his meta to figure a read. So I did just that -_- also I kinda knew that whatever I said you'd be after me this game / : hard to fault you for that but do try to keep personal vendettas at bay long enough to realize that I never put forth this much effort as scum. Period. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 10:04 Superbia wrote: ... I have said before that I am not actively pressuring you anymore because I feel like like nothing more will come from it. I have no idea why you're being so defensive. If you're town move past it. I feel like you may have a point on kurumi if you're town, I will explore it when I've gotten some sleep. I am a very defensive person / : dont hate. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 11:16 Kurumi wrote: You are clearly trying to twist your errors so they fit your narrative. I've never called sicklucker scum. I only have said that his reason for voting you is: a) nonexistent as in, he never gave his own reason for that b) the one we can dig up from his one-liner is that he feels that talking about Slam early is scum-indicative, which I disagree. As I said before, the way you talk about Slam is scummy, not the fact you have talked about him at all. As you can see, I have my vote casted on nobody. Not you, not sicklucker. The reason? I believed that you might really be a Townie with a really weird approach, so I pushed you to give me an explanation for your actions. Your explanation so far was that you've done those things to do anything at all for the sake of not being accused of doing nothing. That is not a Townie perspective. As for sicklucker, I still await his response. Can you be both scum? Sure, you can be. His vote has weight of zero, being so fast and based on a such dubious reasoning. There's nothing contradictory in a story where sicklucker votes for you because he sees you dun goofed and then he "changes his mind" based on your explanations. He voted in such a way it is very easy to unvote you. There was no case or explanation given. But that's not the story I believe in. I believe that sicklucker has laid down a weak vote because he could. Really, it doesn't require much to vote, I could vote anyone right now, especially a person who has not shown up yet and what happens? Nothing. Everyone knows that my vote is a weak one. I could pick a one line off someone's post this early, which is not strongly indicative and decide that's my reason for voting. It's a weak vote - everyone will see that. If he were to unvote you it would not say much to me, yet. But I believe he will be more dead-set on you after your follow-up play. And I am not "setting up a lynch". You are doing it yourself. Setting up a lynch is enraging Kavdragon and pushing your agenda so Town agrees that his anger and his play is not Town-oriented. I want to lynch you based on what you have said and what you have done, not what explanations I give to people. I am not trying to create a narrative surrounding your actions: I am openly questioning them and your explanations, your own words, condemn you. After the initial "well I am a weak player, I make mistakes, oh well, but they were good mistakes! Ones to be done!" you go after me as if your previous actions did not take place. I called your behaviour into question, you have defended it, never explaining how are they not scum-indicative, but saying over and over that it's just you being bad. When I called you on your iffy reasoning for thinking people are scummy - you have not commented on that. You have defended fishing as a townie thing to do. No, fishing (that is, trying to get a role read off someone) is not a townie thing to do. As a townie, you do not try to give information that mafia might act upon! What good can come from getting someone to claim VT or non-VT? None! None for a townie! All in all, all you have done this game is post the way a scared scum feels like, admit to it, defend a scum agenda and try to paint me in a bad light. That won't pass. I am now voting you, because I am sure that you are Mafia. It's Kurumi and I am a he. I have no idea what a bomb pop is and why it should matter. Yes, I do. I am very vary of ritoky, I like Superbia, LightningStorm. No idea what your sonic post was meant to bring to the thread. You seem to like the idea of gumshoe being town, but you have so far not done much to defend him or anything else. Why are you so careless about your town-read being the main topic so far? the same way you can interpret my posts, which actually amount to null (which is what I assumed was the problem with them) as scum oriented, I can far EASILY interpret your crumbing of Slick as scum implication -_- my point on slam was :uncharacteristic, but it's wrong to say that active aware play when out of char is a scum tell my point on Dam amounted to : Could use some meta work (which I did, and concluded was townie) my point on Superbia was he was likely townie with his mentality of yay town lets play but could still of course be scum cause mafia (an opinion I later leaned townie on cause of his questioning and lack of fear) I at no point called them scummy, they were the only people in thread of note to comment on so I commented on them in my own manner because I wanted to play, not wait for someone fuck up so I could pounce like you / : Also you claim im twisting my errors to fit my narrative, where we disagree is on account of me having made any errors in the first place. I offered my thoughts to the game at an early stage and everyone leaped because thats what scum and townies (read townies who have never played with me and or idiots/misguided) do every game I play / : I find your back peddeling on lick funny btw also im not referring to fishing as role hunting, but rather scum/town reaction hunting which is what I figured Dandred was doing, I am not the only one who considers fishing in this manner as Slam implied as much before me. fish folks so was slam calling for people to start hunting for blue roles early on? Or was he just calling for people to start baiting scum? I think it's pretty clear which kind of fishing he and I were referring to and to see any other sort as what we were hinting at reveals just how little you care about what I am actually saying as opposed to what you think you can hammer me for. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 15:55 ritoky wrote: nah, i plan to stay at my current capacity. i carried and dumped too much effort into my last couple games and haven't spammed pictures or been a useless pile of shit in a while. gotta level that play and stick to my style of high variance. of course i say that today while i am emotionally stable, and i am prone to getting mad or sad and being a spamlord. but that said i was angle shooting to locate all the VT in the game whatchoo done to advance the game suckafoo? other than slander my LS read, which while normally terrible was better than every non-mafia player's read on him last game which makes my epeen a little bit larger than others and out of proper slanderation range. also i don't think you'll vote on me because it will make you pretty much mafia 8 out of 10 times. firstly because i am pretty much rock solid VT to an undeniable degree, plus i am being an arrogant provoking prick right here instead of ingratiating myself with people and driving for a foothold in town circle which is my general day 1 strat as mafia. but mostly because it violates your own established read on me, which is...and I QUOTE "wow, every time i think rit is town he is mafia and every time i think he is mafia, he is town >< i need to flip my read" -rsoultin, some random amount of time ago but really what it comes down to is that in closed setups as VT it is great to locate other VT or gauge how many VT are in the game and begin forming a coalition; an expedition if you will. it creates a situation where if we VT can properly locate eachother and form a block, then mafia must deal with us and our power otherwise they are conceding day phases. so either they concede day phases to a degree by ignoring us or they let us dominate day phases and target blues. locating other VTs as VT is amazingly beneficial in closed setups and worth angle shooting or fishing to find; people who think otherwise have an entirely different mindset about procedural play in mafia than i do and we probably disagree on most things. VTs unite, let us go on our expedition together. and by let us go on our expedition together i mean let's all unite and get together and then you guys carry me to the end cuz i currently lack the effort levels to carry another game. i just wanna be like the guy who barely makes it on frame in the super hero team picture. also tumblewood might be mafia for dat random pile on @ opportune time with little else done or said, but who actually read this hot trash i just dropped that most people will probably think is disruptive to the game rather than actually a decent idea that can only come from town. or they will just say "nai troll" and move on waiting for me to get pissed off and change, but i plan to muster everything inside me, become a person of the gutter, steel my belly; and hold onto my current performance levels for as long as i can. LET'S GO ON AN EXPEDITION YO'S FO RIZZZZZZZLLLELEEEEELELELELELELELELELELLELELELEELLELE why didn't i stop typing 5 mins ago, this was better and funnier when it was shorter, now it is just kinda sad rambling. a person with a good sense of humor is like a good chef, you need to know restraint. when to stop and simply leave the turd lying on the floor awkwardly. i did not have that restraint here and thus the comedic value dropped quite substantially. it makes me sad a little bit; but at some point the tedium and rambling becomes funny again? right? right? No more joke posts please / : it makes you stupid hard to read and or just plain stupid I also hate your vt flaunt -_- if your blue it draws attention, if your actual vt you may possibly be making life harder for blues. Also literally offering reads on whose vt and whose not 0_0 why give information like that? If your bieng deceptive why risk a reaction from someone less aware of your shit? Anything meant to fool scum likely fools town a day in advance. It just seems so uneccecairy for day 1 and any reads you may nab from your antics are ofset by the sketchiness you cloak yourself in that thereby invalidate your intel. All in all, I hate the way your playing and the detrimental play hidden by your meta veneer of IDGAF could very well be a scum ruse. dont like 50/50 scum for sure. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
there are more meanings to this statement, especially with it's timing. Indeed, Things have Started. y'all gotta find out how fast fast is sson my uncle is 'bout 2 hrs south of y'all. He doesn't y'all ya'know, but he is regardless near you. Interesting. Don't worry about it. only hang-up is I am expecting a Suburban dude. What, you live in 2007? That's an incredibly German-like expression; BUILD BUILD BUILD ENGINEERING PEOPLES :D supermegaalakaslamfishes TECH SUPPORT PLS HELP MAH SLAMMED BUTT Ten plus worthless posts. This is far more in line with the Slam I know T_T Null as certain defect clones (UNLESS SECRETLY HE REACTED TO MY CALLING OUT OF HIS POTENTIALLY SERIUS PLAY BY GETTING SILLY, IM ON TO YOU SLAM) | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
What I dislike is the in my opinion too pushy tone here, which you would expect from someone in a heated discussion, but really not from someone who just entered the game. I would expect someone like that to be in a neutral, bored or motivated mood , but not really something like this. Based on this post I will add Kurumi to my scumleans. I fully expect scum to distance from each other in ways like this, and I expect this to contribute to the pool of tells we can get from Koshi if he decides to reply to it. I'm keeping the caveat that Kurumi likes to put up acts of all sorts in mafia games. So not an early priority for me as opposed to gum and LS who in my opinion did more stuff I'd be willing to put my money on. I like this post alot, not just because it aligns with mah own views (thought that always helps) but because it evolves bilievably and it's easy to follow the process of thought 1:Kurumi starts town: Vivax sees his point on koshi, but comes from a diffrent view 2: dips scum :Vivax notes the agressive tone, which is unwaranted, (perhaps a product of adrenaline fitting with a first post of a scum game in some time.) I agree as much. 3: Not a priority: It's perfectly valid to hold someone off if you think they become easier to read later. I agree with that sentiment even if it's unfortunate in this case T_T Noticing the last post while working through the thread, I got curious about shapes read on superbia, which leaves me wondering why shape is so interested about asking these questions which are the sort of questions you like to ask to your scumreads (I'm talking about his question to superbia). I kinda had the feeling there was something to be found here but it's still all pretty consistent besides the suspicion towards super in the last post, but when I look at it closely I'd put shape at the town side of null for the purpose of finding the D1 lynch. Putting forth a bit of mindset work (ie he read him as scummish initially but concluded hes townish by the end) in a logical enough manner (though I would like Vivax to explain what consistent means EXACTLY in this case) suggests an actual process as opposed to an agenda manufacturing reasons for hounding someone. What sticks out is that Kurumi here is pretty focused on LS opinion on the vote without really bothering about his alignment so far. Also the aggressive tone vanished, could be a hint to the aggressive tone being the result of having to doing the first dive into the thread as scum, cause entering the thread as mafia is pretty hard for most out of fear of sounding awkward. And Kurumi came back from a hiatus, so would be consistent with him being mafia. again, comes off as if this is the result of a process (trying to understand why someone might have backed off under pressure) The notable diffrence here between his supiciun of kurumi and me as opposed to kurumis concerning me and licker is that Vivax sounds uncertain but confidant and feels like hes working through a puzzle. Kurumi just comes off as a brute certain that the puzzle pieces will fit cause the box says "good for ages 3 and under". | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 24 2016 12:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote: I think SL is town because his thought process felt a bit more nuanced and energetic at points compared to the last game I played with him where he was scum. This seems fine in terms of logic, also confident and simple (not my strengths but I can appreciate them from afar) Also I agree with his read of Rit, while I think Rit COULD do this as town it comes off as rather pointless at best and fairly destructive at worst. Could ez be scum. Obi is townish despite very little effort, take that for what it's worth (not too much ) : def not a day 1 lynch. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Koshi prewritten for sure, utterly null. I see him as an active helpfull towner who would probally offer an excuse if he was planning to be this inactive. Dont like too much Scumish (40/60) Jat Don't have too many. I read the first pages earlier and they were full of uninteresting gibberish. Now I just read the most recent ones because I somehow can't sleep/headache. meh as fuck, dont know how to read excuses frankly. He could very well be feeling shit, or he could be spouting it. SHOW ME THE TYLENOL JAT. THE PEOPLE WANT PROOF. scumish until pics. (60/40) Licker dont like his role talk, dont like how he assumed what super was reffering to with his vote on me. Also feels pretty meh in his posts, both in content and atitutde (apathetic would be the world) scumish (50/50 ----------------------------- tumbleweed Seeing four people on the gumshoe wagon this early, I'm getting more lynchbait-y vibes from gumshoe. His entrance to the thread was super awkward, and it seems that that is a large basis for all of the votes except Vivax's. If he flips town, one of Superb, SL, Kurumi, and Vivax is scum. dis guy seems legit. also like this from him I'm really not seeing it... why is LS town? You said earlier it was because "he had a few really transparent posts", but I'm not sure what those are. seems like hes trying to understand a vague opinion and comes off pretty calm and attentive in his posts. Seems fine. townish. ---------------------------------- rsoultin: has a meandering post style, hard to read, but sounds like hes having fun you're my town friend ^^ -curls up with- but prob not my buddy his posts are very light and he doesnt come off as stressed at all, which says something cause he has exams atm. I get the sense that playing town for him is stress relief ( to an extent) I couldnt imagine him bieng as chill as he is at this time if he was scum (could be skittled, but more likely hes just having fun) townish ------------------------------- Light he is ethier a perceptive townie or the pocket monster, I have no objectivity townish cause I wanna believe. das all I got. | ||
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
y'know gumshoe. you sound like a nice dude who is frustrated, and you're new, and you seem to be trying really hard which is an admirable quality. you bastard XD | ||
| ||