On January 17 2016 07:09 Cephiro wrote:
Dislikes the post and considers it horrible (as do most in the thread at that point?), but never brings up any reason why.
excuse you, I elaborated on this point when asked by Trifle, and he himself actually said he got where I was coming from.
1. Feels less confident about Trfel, yet doesn't point out specific reasons why. (Saying play is more town / more scum means nothing if you don't clarify what exactly are the things that make you feel that way.)
2. Regardless of #1, wants to keep Trfel as a 2ndary wagon?
3. Doesn't point out any specifics about what he agrees with about the Holyflare case.
Agrees with the point rayn made, and considers it enough of a reason to keep voting Trfel, then mentions how he's been looking better than Holyflare. Talks about how Holy has the majority of votes and expects rayn to swap target to Trfel if he ends up seeming more scummy?
Why not swap his on vote on holyflare that he considers more scummy and pressure him further, rather than constantly keep two viable lynch options that both take turns being scummier than the other? Mind you, he still hasn't presented any logical reasoning (only that he agrees/disagrees with points previously made, or feels more/less towny/scummy about a person, never anything specific).
Gauging interest / encouraging to vote for Trfel, while just mentioning he considers Trfel's case on Holyflare good enough to support?
Suddenly back to thinking Trfel is the more likely mafia, why would he ever take the case on Holyflare made by Trfel seriously if he considers Trfel mafia?
No specific reasoning and never anything of substance regarding any other player in the game, while having been around and posted a decent bit.
He also isn't really committing trying to lynch either player (not that it looks like it's necessary right now?), and gives me off a vibe that is more about wanting to convey a feeling of "I've been sharing my opinion and participated", rather than "I'm trying to lynch my mafia read."
Thus;
##Vote: AlotSomuch
AlotSomuch
Dislikes the post and considers it horrible (as do most in the thread at that point?), but never brings up any reason why.
excuse you, I elaborated on this point when asked by Trifle, and he himself actually said he got where I was coming from.
1. Feels less confident about Trfel, yet doesn't point out specific reasons why. (Saying play is more town / more scum means nothing if you don't clarify what exactly are the things that make you feel that way.)
2. Regardless of #1, wants to keep Trfel as a 2ndary wagon?
3. Doesn't point out any specifics about what he agrees with about the Holyflare case.
Agrees with the point rayn made, and considers it enough of a reason to keep voting Trfel, then mentions how he's been looking better than Holyflare. Talks about how Holy has the majority of votes and expects rayn to swap target to Trfel if he ends up seeming more scummy?
Why not swap his on vote on holyflare that he considers more scummy and pressure him further, rather than constantly keep two viable lynch options that both take turns being scummier than the other? Mind you, he still hasn't presented any logical reasoning (only that he agrees/disagrees with points previously made, or feels more/less towny/scummy about a person, never anything specific).
Gauging interest / encouraging to vote for Trfel, while just mentioning he considers Trfel's case on Holyflare good enough to support?
Suddenly back to thinking Trfel is the more likely mafia, why would he ever take the case on Holyflare made by Trfel seriously if he considers Trfel mafia?
No specific reasoning and never anything of substance regarding any other player in the game, while having been around and posted a decent bit.
He also isn't really committing trying to lynch either player (not that it looks like it's necessary right now?), and gives me off a vibe that is more about wanting to convey a feeling of "I've been sharing my opinion and participated", rather than "I'm trying to lynch my mafia read."
Thus;
##Vote: AlotSomuch
Honestly most of this is utter crap where you answer your previous question with my very next quote or leave out the quotes where I answer these same questions from other players. This is a skimmy case made of skimmy facts and skimmy reasons, but a whole lot of crap.