| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 15:03 geript wrote: Oh yeah and Breshke is town. Also, only Breshke should pick Watson. I think that's a really good role for him and Watson should claimed Holmes' sanity ASAP; I'm 50/50 on him claiming Moriarty's. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Im 7, that is fairly high if i was mafia i would probably the highest or second highest on my team. i could probably get a role that does KP if I wanted to. I know I am not a good player especially scum player so WIFOM ALERT would happily sack myself and take down some people with me. Instead Im claiming to take watson which if you actually think about it would be perfect for someone you suspect. If i lie to sherlock or moriarty about their sanity it would become apparent very quickly. So can you explain why even if i am a mafia read me picking watson would be bad? | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:17 Rels wrote: I had this feeling when you "kindly" adviced me to take the number 7. You already did it to FF. Since then you did nothing but you have 2 pages of filter anyway. Who is scum in your opinion ? I was telling you that FF might pick 7 so you should have been careful? Not really intrested in talking about who is scum right now because i have piddles because nothing has really happened. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:21 Rels wrote: Talking about this post: Like you did a kinda useless post in which you told FF to take 7, then you reminded the thread you did that one post. No, I was telling you that you might be overlapping On January 20 2016 23:19 Rels wrote: You know that's actually super true. If you lie about their sanity we'll know pretty fast. The problems is that Watson is also a doctor, so if you're scum we're giving you a protective role, but it's better than a KP role. Why is the bolded included in this post. You disagree with yourself in the same sentence what's the point? | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Rels it is really annoying when I explain something to you then you say it back to me like you are letting me know | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:41 sicklucker wrote: a mistake mafia probably cant make because of the scum qt. oh wait you already scum slipped that mafia cant put there numbers in that. thanks for that lol the scumslip would have been that mafia COULDNT have put their numbers in the QT. So yep dumb again. Actually going to bed now. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
I also like kitas suggestions aswell | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
 | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 21 2016 07:21 Palmar wrote: Kita's additions completely undermine my plan. The reason is quite simple. If we assign everyone roles, mafia can just freely pick a role that wasn't assigned to them. The entire point of having ffa/check players is for them to take roles that SHOULD have been taken before them to PROVE the players before them actually took the roles they were meant to take. It's a failsafe. If we have no failssafes, mafia can just pick whatever the fuck they want. Essentially, my plan is pointless. I basically can't be arsed arguing this, I am out of energy trying to get people to be not stupid. Kita is very likely mafia because he's not dumb enough to think his version is an actual improvement. But then don't we have roles like moriarty/kita that can perform role checks anyway. I understand the importance of checks but not having them doesn't completely undermine your plan i feel that is a bit of an overreaction. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 21 2016 07:27 Fecalfeast wrote: oh well if alotsomuch isn't gambling then I want to gamble someone has to pick watson then. disfo you can have it now if you like | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 21 2016 07:30 disformation wrote: wut? I like, but what are you picking then? oO What palmar told me to pick | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 21 2016 07:41 disformation wrote: if we go that route I'd like someone to get Professor Moriarty so imma change to watson now, if no one has complaints Fairly sure it was assigned it to someone. iirc it was TT Just depends if they see it or not | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Kinda shit if ppl know you are picking it idk | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Also I understand kei's frustration not sure it is alignment indicative though Kind of bothers me that rels was all ancy about me picking watson because he thought i was scum then Palmar tells me to pick holmes and he is fine with that plan although still thinks im scum. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
