Dark Tournament Mini Mafia - Page 109

On December 01 2015 09:17 The Shining wrote:
And what looks good about the rest of that post? It's a long post and the only thing I got from it is I'm scum, DYH questioning Rels is towny, but Rels is also towny off of some metaread, and everyone else is null.

On December 01 2015 10:00 The Shining wrote:
Rels is on the scumside of null for scumming both Damdred and DYH for wanting the named VT to claim(which I agree with, there's no reason not to), along with 0 townreads.

On December 03 2015 03:27 Fidei86 wrote:
16/26.

The only reason not to policy lynch Onegu is that he will almost certainly be replaced for inactivity. I'm probably going to put my vote on Moosy once i finish my run through. He has been useless and I can't stand people who put keeping their own meta pure ahead of winning the f***ing game.

On December 03 2015 04:44 Trfel wrote:
I'm going to bring this up again. Please, hear me out, but I DO NOT WANT TO START A MECHANICS DISCUSSION.

First, I will assume that the argument that Rels presents about the BoxeR claiming is 100% correct. No matter what. No questions asked. Just for the purpose of this argument.

With this assumption, and two people telling the BoxeR to claim, it's important for this argument to be made as quickly as possible so that the BoxeR can see it and not claim. The thing is, Rels presents a really well-explained argument for this. It kind of feels too good to be true. He's already stopped to analyze the setups from a mafia perspective, and see what they know, and see what town knows. He's 100% sure that mafia doesn't know which setup the game uses, despite the standard Blazinghand newbie game using a similar four-option setup where the mafia team IS told the setup.

Like, I know that Rels is good. But is he really this good? His first post of the game, 37 minutes after the day began.... It doesn't feel quite right.

On December 11 2015 23:44 Rels wrote:

Around that time, I was PMd by Onegu asking me if he could replace out of my game. This is a extremely weird coincidence.

On December 11 2015 23:59 disformation wrote:


Hm. Isn't that out of game information?

On December 05 2015 08:27 Fecalfeast wrote:
I think the fidei palmar interaction has palmar looking towny while fidei came out looking a little worse to me.

One thing I remember that I'll dig up is


Which looks a little too much like he's trying to avoid palmar expanding further on his possible suspicions and/or not wanting to slip up and further those suspicions.

additionally I don't like this

this comes after fidei said "can we lynch you for not playing the game palmar?" and palmar retorted with his filter length. It looks like fidei saw a potential lynch option down the road and made a post without even checking palmar out. Could possibly indicate that fidei's not really reading since I remember at least seeing a number a palmar posts.

I was going to comment on a possible overexplanation by fidei on why he is ok lynching hts because hts is probably aware of NM's ability to read her since they're married iirc but that's getting a little wifomy even for me

On December 04 2015 09:25 Fecalfeast wrote:

Why did I scowl so hard after reading this post?

That was weird

On December 04 2015 09:29 Fecalfeast wrote:

I was just about to say...


Maybe the reason you feel like you're being ignored is because your walls of text are critting the fuck out of everyone's brains

On December 12 2015 00:13 disformation wrote:
Was looking at a few filter, but not really seeing anything new...
FF actually had a bunch of posts on Fidei86, like:


So he was pushing Fidei86 a bit. Though again: no real interactions imo...

On December 12 2015 00:14 Rels wrote:

Yep that's true FF attacked fidei with arguments not said by someone else, which is super unlikely for partners.

On December 11 2015 17:44 Rels wrote:

1 - the whole day I was suspicious of Trfel.
2 - at EOD he came back voting me with no explanation; left; than came back changing his mind again and voted FF. I found that suspicious.
3 - I have DYH as scum, and I found his behaviour towards Trfel at EOD maybe partner indicative; he said he was OK to lynch Trfel; didn't vote him; and went back on disfo.

On December 12 2015 00:34 LightningStrike wrote:

Okay I will see if that actually lines up.

On December 12 2015 00:37 Rels wrote:

Sure, can you vote DYH afterwards ?

On December 12 2015 00:59 LightningStrike wrote:

1. Okay...
2. He said he didn't like some stuff from you(was very vague) hence why he voted for you.
3. And that's why assiocation reads are generally not that great
Anyways I could possibly vote DYH but the wagon buildpotentally troubling. I'll weigh the options in a little bit.