Also, if you prefered Xata/rayn/artanis over Xata/rayn/SL why not simply reject the nomination? You knew Aratanis was the next mission leader, right?
[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 74
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
Also, if you prefered Xata/rayn/artanis over Xata/rayn/SL why not simply reject the nomination? You knew Aratanis was the next mission leader, right? | ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:53 Xatalos wrote: I guess SL's position on me and the missions is somewhat unnatural. He first scumreads me for not 100% townreading him at first... But he'd still want to go on a mission during my leadership, and even include me on the second mission if the first mission passed. Not really sure what his read on me was at this point? Still scum? Null? It kind of feels like it's a town lean or something already. And then when he's included with me and rayn, I'm very likely town...? Would be very curious to hear about this read progression on me. Why wasn't this a concern when you chose to nominate him? | ||
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:56 kitaman27 wrote: Why wasn't this a concern when you chose to nominate him? He didn't really call me town until the team was already chosen... That's the oddest part in his filter, I think. Maybe I should have reconsidered voting NO at that point, but I kind of felt like we had just formed a nice towncircle at that point. Clearly that's not the case, so maybe his switch was scum-motivated. Hard to say because he didn't really talk much about his read on me. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:58 sicklucker wrote: YOU ASS HATS IMA GET YOU Could you explain how your read on me progressed throughout the game? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:43 Half the Sky wrote: Second point is the conflicting read on Superbia where he was nitpicking Xatalos over scum being at a disadvantage (paraphrasing) whereas Kita took the opposite position on this. Saying that Superbia was stretching it. Does it make sense for a town rayn to read Superbia that way? That's probably the first question to think hard on. We all know that when rayn is town, he's nitpicky over semantics. As mafia....I honestly don't remember. I know the rage level is the same, the last mafia game I recall (TL LXX before he replaced out) I don't recall a lot of nitpicking but I might need to refresh my memory, that game was in March. Ugh. Does anyone else recall any notable rayn scum games where he was close to replicate town play? First wave of reads: Could you explain this point better? I don't really get it. Something meta-related? | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:00 Fidei86 wrote: !!! MISSION FAILED !!! 1 Sabotage action detected. Day 2 Artanis[Xp]'s Nomination Phase Phase will end in at 23:00 GMT (+00:00) on 7 November 2015. Alright then we have at least one scum in Xata / rayn / SL. Then I think we have at the very least 2 scums in Xata / rayn / SL / HTS / Arta, maybe 3. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 07 2015 08:10 Half the Sky wrote: Alright, I know I said sicklucker was the most likely since he was the "least town" but I think especially because the first mission (!!!) failed, it really might be worth our while to tinfoil rayn and Xatalos to make sure we didn't miss anything. Can you explain this ? On November 06 2015 18:22 Rels wrote: That doesn't make sense. If SL is mafia and "suck it up and pass" the team, then he didn't "suck it up", he voted "yes" to a team with a scum in it. You seem to assume: - SL is town, since you're wondering whether 2 or 3 mafias voted against it, so it has to be a clean team - SL is mafia, since he could have suck it up and pass Or is there another logical explanation for this post ? 'cause I'm not seeing it | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:25 Xatalos wrote: Mehh... I guess there's the very slight argument against rayn that he so easily townread Superbia when I got the opposite impression from the events... I just kind of don't think rayn would go out of his way to townread Superbia in that situation as scum, no matter what Superbia is. From what I remember, he scumread very aggressively in the VS game as scum (for not-so-good reasons as well), but didn't have many townreads at all. Meanwhile in the last Vanilla game as town he gave away townreads very easily (especially the townreads to me, Vivax and ritoky right away). So this basically falls more into his town play than scum play, I think. Thoughts on me after this first mission eh? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 05 2015 02:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because if the team goes through and gets sabotaged i am going to call her scum since i am sure Xatalos is town. If you are on the mission instead of Xatalos i am not going to call her scum, at least that's not as likely as with Xatalos. The reasonning he put forward here is "HTS knew that if she picked Xatalos and I and the team failed, everybody would know HTS is scum since Xata and I are so town". Well, the same situation happened with SL instead of HTS. So if rayn is scum, that would the reason he pushed SL to be in the team. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:29 ShoCkeyy wrote: Thoughts on me after this first mission eh? I guess you could say *confused*. You voted against it even though there was clearly scum included... I think it's less likely for scum to vote "against their win condition" with no communications or anything in this game, so that makes you more likely town. It's not a huge thing or anything, but a point in your favor regardless. Now it'd be better if you started otherwise indicating townie traits ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:16 Rels wrote: Alright then we have at least one scum in Xata / rayn / SL. Then I think we have at the very least 2 scums in Xata / rayn / SL / HTS / Arta, maybe 3. I think that's a reasonable assumption... But rayn is most likely town, so I guess that would mean HTS, Artanis and SL would be scum? Kind of hard to see at least Artanis being scum, HTS maybe. So I'd guess there are 1+ scum hiding in the NO votes as well. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:31 Xatalos wrote: Yeah, I like how rayn approaches the all-scum nomination thing. He even warns me not to talk about it when I come to the thread ![]() Apparently you missed this (lucky you I just read it): On November 05 2015 01:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't like this post, and the fact that you are not looking behind the words at all. Let's break this into pieces: My reasoning for doing this is the following: 1) town - i believe that you three are scum (in which case it makes this the best play if all of you three agree - it just does, as the town auto-wins after regardless of what team we choose next ![]() 2) town - i believe there is a chance that you all three are scum, and i know you will never agree to this as either alignment 3) mafia - idk... you can insert your reasoning here because you seem to think there could be a reason, i can't give one, since i am not mafia and i would never do that when i am ALREADY on the team and (heavily) townread by 7 other players.... Now the point of all this was a couple of things: - Rels; i didn't learn anything, although he called my logic "twisted", and i still don't know why. maybe he explains it someday, as there is nothing twisted in my logic. (i am pretty sure Xatalos & Artanis see what i was after here) - ShoCkeyy; i don't really care since he is scum anyways, but he thinks i am scum (regardless of what he tries to say -- he does), so why does he accept a team proposed by scum? Like.. if i was scum i would put a teammate there, obviously, i am not stupid. - regarding you, i wanted to push your reads out, because i was annoyed of you not giving any concrete reads. I know you would never agree to this regardless of who is mafia and regardless of your alignment. The thing that confuses me is that you kinda called me scummy for it, when there is literally no scum motivation for me to do that (i actually did a similar "anti-town" thing in Nuclear Winter mafia (which never had any anti-town motivation that anyone could explain) -- and caught Ace pants down on N1 ![]() rayn never intended to fully push for this all scum team; it was a plan to get reactions, as proved by the sentence "Now the point of all this was a couple of things:". So you cannot award him town points for pushing something that was a simple reaction test. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:48 Xatalos wrote: Or maybe Artanis is just fooling us :/ He was the towniest town that ever towned in the I'm a Cop you idiot game and was scum all along. *shivers* What does Artanis have to do with this mission when it was you, rayn and SL on this mission. That means one of you three have to be mafia. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 07 2015 09:45 Xatalos wrote: I think that's a reasonable assumption... But rayn is most likely town, so I guess that would mean HTS, Artanis and SL would be scum? Kind of hard to see at least Artanis being scum, HTS maybe. So I'd guess there are 1+ scum hiding in the NO votes as well. Don't know, I'm kinda re evaluating everything here. The obvious answer to me is "rayn is scum, SL is town, rayn put SL to blame him when the team fails." Then at least HTS or Arta with him, maybe both. But SL is not obvious town either, so I'm not sure. And let's not forget YOU are the one that nominated the failing team. If you're scum, that would mean you broke your meta, but that's possible. | ||
| ||