EPTTL Mafia Ban List 3.0 - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message Blazinghand if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 08 2015 08:15 Koshi wrote: Slam didn't reveal anything this game but he might do it in the future. Every time he entered a game while not in it, it has been harmless. But it is going to ruin a game one day. Slam totes rebel. To clarify the issue on Slam, he's done it multiple times, and I know there was at least one game I was hosting where I issued him a warning for posting in a game he wasn't playing in whilst actually sitting out that game. He has history of doing things like this and it just needs to be discouraged. The number of games is up for debate obviously as Rels indicated but this is the fundamental point we were trying to drive home. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17324 Posts
On November 08 2015 13:08 Alakaslam wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/496215-mini-mafia-the-kinda-vanilla-experience?page=99#1974 | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5955 Posts
| ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Happy to oblige if he childishly ruins the game for everyone else rather than just ask for it post game. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 08 2015 10:30 yamato77 wrote: I won't be playing any time soon so the game ban doesn't really affect me. I guess in the spirit of the ban I won't sit out unless I actually want to play? idk. I don't think I should be banned for not voting on a day I was obviously going to get lynched on but meh, rules are rules. Well, your potential modkill gave the opportunity to the mafia to try a double kill D2 on you + GB, which almost worked and would have put the town at LYLO D3. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On November 08 2015 21:02 KelsierSC wrote: he wants a permanent ban it seems. Happy to oblige if he childishly ruins the game for everyone else rather than just ask for it post game. HOLY OVERREACTION BATMAN He didn't ruin anything ever in the million games he already played. Dafuq did he ruin by posting after dead except some possible wifom that nobody actually believed or would believe ever. Slam is still a superstar of TL Mafia. Maybe THE superstar. #Slamdidalmostnothingwrong | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| | ↓ people want a warning. some random dude who wants to punish an almost innocent slamfish doesn't even mention it Alakaslam his identity gets stolen by a raging lunatic and gets trashed for no reason at all after he died. Host did probably nothing after Alakaslam complained in obs and therefore Alakaslam makes an almost innocent post to stop the racism. | | ↓ Hottest ban since some poor soul got a 3 games ban for complaining about a first degree murder. People are ok with perma banning Alakaslam the superstar or give him a 3 game ban. Both host and cohost want a 2 game ban. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
Alakaslam reacting to being bad mouthed for playing the game is permaban. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
REALLY IT WORKS. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
Was Alakaslam already officially warned for this behavior? No precedent = No punishment. | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14276 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Tictock
United States6051 Posts
I'm more concerned by the amount of personal attacks that have been happening here. Certain people are really bad about berating their fellow players and it keeps resulting in drama and people quitting/leaving. We all have moments where we get frustrated with our fellow players and many of us are guilty of name calling and being abrasive, but there is a line and a time when saying mean things is not acceptable and totally unnecessary. So for this situation I find rayns behavior of attacking Slams character when Slam was no longer even in the game the clear cause of this incident. That sort of behavior is just, or even more, detrimental than Slam posting in the thread after death. Just my 2 cents. | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
On November 08 2015 07:45 sicklucker wrote: thats like 10x worse then what I did so im sure he will get a 1 game ban. But seriously if I get banned for a 2 word pm to a player when both are alignments are confirmed t each other this should be like a 50 game ban. not that i want that im just salty your suggesting less then me lol lol the salt | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 09 2015 03:10 Tictock wrote: I agree with slam getting either warned or ignored. His behavior was over the line, but he was provoked and I didn't see him doing anything game breaking. I'm more concerned by the amount of personal attacks that have been happening here. Certain people are really bad about berating their fellow players and it keeps resulting in drama and people quitting/leaving. We all have moments where we get frustrated with our fellow players and many of us are guilty of name calling and being abrasive, but there is a line and a time when saying mean things is not acceptable and totally unnecessary. So for this situation I find rayns behavior of attacking Slams character when Slam was no longer even in the game the clear cause of this incident. That sort of behavior is just, or even more, detrimental than Slam posting in the thread after death. Just my 2 cents. I'm probably going to get flamed for this but I feel this needs to be said. I will say this, there have been certain individuals the past 3-4 games that have been pre-warned/warned in certain games and sometimes repeatedly. I have been advised by more experienced moderators that bans generally only happen with modkills. That said, I feel there is a difficult precedent to balance between community policing (i.e. WOTC, or wisdom of the crowds) and more proactive moderation and/or post-game action (as in more post-game warnings). To use a recent game that I ran, Drams was notoriously toxic, with 4 behaviour warnings issued along with a general thread warning. All who were pre-warned or warned either backed down immediately or apologised and tread carefully after. At some point during the game or after, 2-3 individuals cited difficulties dealing with toxic situations resulting in them leaving or taking a break. I had no room to modkill or take any further action on people and I also cannot control what people do in other games where I have no involvement obviously. That said as far as I've been advised there are only 1-2 specific behaviour offences that result in a direct modkill which have been quite rare. I feel with some of the recent issues we've had, and chatting with a few people, I'll just say that I feel more moderators should have WOTC in effect in their ruleset (at least for non-newbie games) and the community when signing up for games should use their discretion in aiming for a productive yet civil game where people of all experience/skill levels can learn and do their thing. | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:26 Half the Sky wrote: I'm probably going to get flamed for this but I feel this needs to be said. I will say this, there have been certain individuals the past 3-4 games that have been pre-warned/warned in certain games and sometimes repeatedly. I have been advised by more experienced moderators that bans generally only happen with modkills. That said, I feel there is a difficult precedent to balance between community policing (i.e. WOTC, or wisdom of the crowds) and more proactive moderation and/or post-game action (as in more post-game warnings). To use a recent game that I ran, Drams was notoriously toxic, with 4 behaviour warnings issued along with a general thread warning. All who were pre-warned or warned either backed down immediately or apologised and tread carefully after. At some point during the game or after, 2-3 individuals cited difficulties dealing with toxic situations resulting in them leaving or taking a break. I had no room to modkill or take any further action on people and I also cannot control what people do in other games where I have no involvement obviously. That said as far as I've been advised there are only 1-2 specific behaviour offences that result in a direct modkill which have been quite rare. I feel with some of the recent issues we've had, and chatting with a few people, I'll just say that I feel more moderators should have WOTC in effect in their ruleset (at least for non-newbie games) and the community when signing up for games should use their discretion in aiming for a productive yet civil game where people of all experience/skill levels can learn and do their thing. I agree | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://www.quickmeme.com/img/d4/d4c7ed99c07a00c53309d835d78316a8cc36af60107131bed123b3f056b5e5bf.jpg) | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:26 Half the Sky wrote: I feel with some of the recent issues we've had, and chatting with a few people, I'll just say that I feel more moderators should have WOTC in effect in their ruleset (at least for non-newbie games) and the community when signing up for games should use their discretion in aiming for a productive yet civil game where people of all experience/skill levels can learn and do their thing. Out of curiosity, has anyone ever been barred from playing in a game due to WotC requests? | ||
| ||
