EPTTL Mafia Ban List 3.0 - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message Blazinghand if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
Nothing more really to add on that front. On October 16 2015 09:59 sicklucker wrote: Bh just change the games to a set time and we will all have alot less work to do. it just makes sense the ban system is dumb Saw this as well...I can see pros and cons to this...static time tracking is easier to manage but if there's a load of minis being missed out on, it's more games missed....IDK. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On October 17 2015 05:42 Half the Sky wrote: Saw this as well...I can see pros and cons to this...static time tracking is easier to manage but if there's a load of minis being missed out on, it's more games missed....IDK. Yea, I don't particularly like time-based bans because it doesn't treat people equally. Let's say you have someone like me who plays 2-3 games a year. If, in my last game, I got a 1 month ban, it wouldn't even matter since I haven't played a game in like 7 months anyways. If marv or rayn in their prime playing days got a one month ban, they would miss like maybe 4-5 games. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On October 17 2015 06:38 Keirathi wrote: Yea, I don't particularly like time-based bans because it doesn't treat people equally. Let's say you have someone like me who plays 2-3 games a year. If, in my last game, I got a 1 month ban, it wouldn't even matter since I haven't played a game in like 7 months anyways. If marv or rayn in their prime playing days got a one month ban, they would miss like maybe 4-5 games. Historically, this is the reason that the community has gone for "1 game ban" instead of like, 3 week ban or whatever. For example, a common ban is for someone abandoning a game. (They sign up, play for 48 or 72 hours, then disappear). If this person shows up 3 months later and just signs up for another game, the "1 month ban" does nothing while the "1 game ban" has them sit a game out. Lots of people play only occasionally. That's not to say there aren't reasons we might want time rather than game based bans; but that's the reason the decision was made in the past, and on the other occasions this issue has been brought up. If you feel like banning based on games isn't great, and have other suggestions, that's a great reason to open a new thread to discuss it in, rather than post in the ban list which is probably best reserved for talking about bans. | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 17 2015 06:38 Keirathi wrote: Yea, I don't particularly like time-based bans because it doesn't treat people equally. Let's say you have someone like me who plays 2-3 games a year. If, in my last game, I got a 1 month ban, it wouldn't even matter since I haven't played a game in like 7 months anyways. If marv or rayn in their prime playing days got a one month ban, they would miss like maybe 4-5 games. is there a downside? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
It seems to me that banning new players is counter productive and once banned from a newb game they won't return if they have to sit out. However if they make it through all there games they skip the warning phase if they accumulated them in newb game and go straight to bans in Norm games. Just a thought. (Unless the newb did something dreadfully heinous) | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
but you would still sitout games if you wanted too? Like its the same thing except you gotta type 1 word | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On October 17 2015 08:28 Damdred wrote: Maybe it's feasible to think about student games are only able to be given warnings to New players. But out of student games they are liable to all the normal ban list mechanics. It seems to me that banning new players is counter productive and once banned from a newb game they won't return if they have to sit out. However if they make it through all there games they skip the warning phase if they accumulated them in newb game and go straight to bans in Norm games. Just a thought. (Unless the newb did something dreadfully heinous) I agree with this sentiment. Damdred is smart, understands how other people feel, and is always right. | ||
|
-Celestial-
United Kingdom3867 Posts
On October 18 2015 01:54 MoosyDoosy wrote: I agree with this sentiment. Damdred is smart, understands how other people feel, and is always right. That being said...where does that place repeat offenders for 'non-heinous' rule breaking? I hate to pick on Gumdrop here but he's a prime example. He's played in a grand total of two games so far. But in BOTH games he literally just disappeared D1 with no notice given to anyone. In the first game he got replaced (and if he hadn't got replaced then me and HtS who were mafia with him would have been in a very awkward position) and the second he got modkilled. I can understand not wanting to put people off whilst also teaching how to play; I myself derped quite hard in my first game by editing a post because I'm used to editing posts on this forum like fifty times before I'm happy with it but only got a warning for it. But if someone just keeps doing the same thing with no real excuse for it... | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/j8DpG4V.jpg) Judge Dredd is not impressed. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
 | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 01 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: The system works. This statement is offensive. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
![[image loading]](http://weknowyourdreams.com/image.php?pic=/images/salt/salt-09.jpg) | ||
| ||
