|
On July 14 2015 02:45 WaveofShadow wrote:
If you guys eventually decide to lynch me go ahead.
I started out this game generally not caring but now it's gone sort of beyond that, whatever that is. Not gonna make any excuses.
For what it's worth I'm sorry.
rip
|
Hey marv is it time for dick move analysis yet?
|
On July 14 2015 01:48 Harkon wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 01:29 ruXxar wrote:
1) He's actually pushing logical targets. I find myself agreeing with a lot of his reasoning, as compared to just trying to tunnel people to death with weak arguments and a play on emotions.
Last game he tried to lynch people by ridiculing them and their arguments and being over the top and shouting at them. Blowing things out of proportions and trying to make them look stupid.
I'm seeing a relatively more "calm" and reasoning HF this game. More serious and down to business.
Sorry, but this is exactly what he has been doing this game too.Don't like this post in general.
No, what he's doing here is different:
1) Less incessant and cursing.
2) Less direct attacks on person and more attacks on the arguments.
3) Capslock factor is down.
Also, what don't you like, the post or the arguments?
I'm open for discussion if you perceive it differently.
|
On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true?
That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people.
Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense.
Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right.
Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off.
|
On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off.
You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently.
Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target.
I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense.
|
On July 14 2015 02:41 Holyflare wrote:
Hm the more i think about trfel the more it's obvious he hasn't read a thing past the first half of d1
This is what I also noticed when he made the first big case against you, in general he just seems disinterested and not following the thread.
|
On July 14 2015 02:45 WaveofShadow wrote:
If you guys eventually decide to lynch me go ahead.
I started out this game generally not caring but now it's gone sort of beyond that, whatever that is. Not gonna make any excuses.
For what it's worth I'm sorry.
Might as well just get modkilled then?
|
On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense.
Again you spew the same trash as before. There's nothing I can do more than complain about the BM lynch and leave my vote on MZ. I'm not the entire game, other people were way more influential and I didn't plan on flailing around like an idiot cause of that lynch.
As for the first and third text blocks, that's nothing that makes me mafia it's just my personal preference on WHO I form reads, how I form them, if I form them etc. and you try to twist it as if it was the only possible town play possible. Maybe I just don't give two shits about milo cause I don't give two shits if he's the main wagon since N1. I form reads how I want them and I'm certainly even less willing to form one now that you're on my ass with these trash tier arguments.
|
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense.
Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo?
|
On July 14 2015 03:04 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense. Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo?
Vivax is actually capable of forming coherent sentences and responding though
|
On July 14 2015 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 03:04 Holyflare wrote:On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense. Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo? Vivax is actually capable of forming coherent sentences and responding though
Maybe you should read the quotes in my profile then.
|
mrt :/
oh, yeah, truffle is disinterested in general but it's not necessarily game-related? for what that's worth. doesn't really excuse not reading cause i still caught up >< and stayed up till 2a.m. doing the weekend's chem work as a result so screw you guys for making me read lol ><
hf, what is it that makes you think milo is townie, anyway?
|
Your entire arguments started off the premise that I'm mafia, twisting everything I did as if I was mafia. It's like you were prowling somewhere waiting for me to not deliver more on milo for 6 hours straight only to make that argument.
That's something I expect from a super tunneled townie but not from you given you didn't act towards me like a super tunneled townie up until that point.
|
On July 14 2015 03:07 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 03:04 Holyflare wrote:On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense. Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo? Vivax is actually capable of forming coherent sentences and responding though Maybe you should read the quotes in my profile then.
LOL.
Anyway..
You can say "I play the game my way and I don't care about anything else" all you want, but are you actually saying you don't really care if milo gets lynched, regardless of his alignment? You totally lost me.
|
@HF:
It's hard to determine milo's alignment when he isn't even willing to defend himself or participate in answering questions.
|
On July 14 2015 03:10 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 03:07 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 03:04 Holyflare wrote:On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense. Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo? Vivax is actually capable of forming coherent sentences and responding though Maybe you should read the quotes in my profile then. LOL. Anyway.. You can say "I play the game my way and I don't care about anything else" all you want, but are you actually saying you don't really care if milo gets lynched, regardless of his alignment? You totally lost me.
Let's say plumber mario walks into the european parliament, full of witty powerful politicians. Everyone knows he's plumber mario and mario knows he's just a plumber.
Is plumber mario going to try to influence the politicians as if he was a politician himself?
When all the politicians are dead mario can truly become a hero but until then he's just a plumber.
|
On July 14 2015 03:11 ruXxar wrote:
@HF:
It's hard to determine milo's alignment when he isn't even willing to defend himself or participate in answering questions.
my problem with him earlier lol >< like, in all honesty i have no problem with lynching scott today...he's very probably scum...but this will just come up again tomorrow. and the next day if we still keep milo alive. disregarding the fact that he's gonna flip scum anyway, he's not cooperating so i don't think we're going to get anything more out of him
|
On July 14 2015 03:11 ruXxar wrote:
@HF:
It's hard to determine milo's alignment when he isn't even willing to defend himself or participate in answering questions.
Ask me a question.
|
On July 14 2015 03:14 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2015 03:10 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 03:07 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 03:04 Holyflare wrote:On July 14 2015 02:58 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:51 Vivax wrote:On July 14 2015 02:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 14 2015 02:31 Vivax wrote:
Besides if I was mafia with him I'd already be bussing the shit outta him. Call it wifom if you want, you can, but it's just what I know of my own play.
The clarity arguments on me made him sketchy as fuck in my book given the way he mixed stuff in it that doesn't mean anything, as if he was trying to reinforce his argument at any cost with the shittiest arguments even and that's not what I'd expect of him given I wouldn't expect him to be that tunneled on me already in that post. What things have I said that aren't true? That I have given no opinion on milo when I do it right while I give the read on Scott and a bunch of other people. Saying I did nothing about the BM lynch like I was supposed to do more than I did when it wouldn't make any sense. Saying Kelsier's D1 was "fine" as if that was a reason to townread him. I said that on D1 trolling or not doing much doesn't mean anything and the Palmar flip proves me right. Overall your entire post looks like a massive, unobjective shitflinging and it pissed me quite off. You literally said "I don't know about milo, I'll need to think more about him" 12 hours before lynchtime or whatever. OUR CURRENT LYNCH TARGET and you're in no rush to get a read on him apparently. Doing nothing about the BM lynch would be fine, I was perfectly happy switching I thought he was a better lynch at the time. However you thought the lynch was HORRIBLE and just let it happen anyway. "lol u guys are all bad lynching the claimed wanderer" followed with no alternative or caring about moving the lynch target. I'm not saying you should townread Kelsier at all (although you should). What I was saying, and this is my third time pointing it out to you, is that YOU saying his d1 was fine but he's done nothing after that, when the only scummy thing he's done AFAIK is being so indifferent during d1 lynch. Somehow you missed this but you still read him as scum. It makes no sense. Woah there nelly! Didn't you just accuse me of wasting my time trying to get a read on milo? Vivax is actually capable of forming coherent sentences and responding though Maybe you should read the quotes in my profile then. LOL. Anyway.. You can say "I play the game my way and I don't care about anything else" all you want, but are you actually saying you don't really care if milo gets lynched, regardless of his alignment? You totally lost me. Let's say plumber mario walks into the european parliament, full of witty powerful politicians. Everyone knows he's plumber mario and mario knows he's just a plumber. Is plumber mario going to try to influence the politicians as if he was a politician himself? When all the politicians are dead mario can truly become a hero but until then he's just a plumber.
-snorts-
never would have thought you were "just a plumber" in guardians of the galaxy vivax xP
|
In other words no, I don't really care if he gets lynched or if one of my other reads gets lynched cause I don't expect to be able to make much of a difference while in the european parliament.
But as the game goes on I'll find some shrooms and inflate like ronald mcdonald on viagra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
