EPTNewbie Student Mafia IX - Page 69
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:25 The Shining wrote: This was always going to happen, since D1 fell on my weekend. But this is misinformation now. I'm here. I'm not behind in the thread. I've referenced recent interactions. I'm interacting. I'm not just summarizing, I've pulled examples from your filter. And yes, I was pinged out by everyone. Last night, yesterday afternoon, etc. So anything I do after that is doing it after being pinged out, regardless of whether I was going to or not. How is that alignment indicative? because as scum the natural tendency of players is to look for their name in the thread and be more passive when they aren't being talked about. very few scum are capable of playing from the front and succeeding. people who don't do shit until pinged out tend to be scum indicative. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:28 prplhz wrote: hey guys i'm reading up now anything i should pay attention to? you role or mafia? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 07 2015 03:00 ritoky wrote: prp is a role or mafia, take that 1 to the bank. had that read since like his 3rd or 4th post. waiting on his claim. what the fuck is this even | ||
|
-Celestial-
United Kingdom3867 Posts
If he tries to say VT at this point then I'm honestly going to facepalm so hard. | ||
|
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:19 -Celestial- wrote: Alternatively if I was showing I was scared and unwilling to push people then people would think that I'd drove the mislynch train and then gone quiet, hoping not to be noticed in the fallout. Both are potentially very good reasons to scum me in fairness. Yeah. My point is, it happened and it's enough for me to scum you or at least not town you. And no one has questioned it. You've even got a conf town read for it. I just want to know why. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
FINAL VOTE COUNT: scott31337 (8) : -Celestial-, sicklucker, disformation, Half the Sky, y0su, FecalFeast, The Shining, Stutters695 Half the Sky (3) : disformation (1) : scott31337 prplhz (1) : Tictock -Celestial- (0) : sicklucker (0) : I don't see any reason that scum wouldn't want to disassociate from a ML. In terms of where they'd go, I think it would be easier to jump on another wagon than start their own. | ||
|
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:21 ritoky wrote: i had a small scum read on her for it that i was intentionally blowing out of proportion to try and get a 2nd wagon for vote info. it mildly worked. in reality it was a small scum read. and yes i think by day 2 if you start your superbia is mafia reads with "he sounds off" and people really key in on that. it is a meh read that is probably bad. So it's acceptable when you do it to make a read more serious than it is for info purposes but it's not acceptable when someone is using it, amongst other things, to make a case? | ||
|
-Celestial-
United Kingdom3867 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:32 The Shining wrote: Yeah. My point is, it happened and it's enough for me to scum you or at least not town you. And no one has questioned it. You've even got a conf town read for it. I just want to know why. To read into it you'd have to look at my town style but I only have one game on here and it was as scum. You could ask me directly but all I'm going to say as EITHER alignment is "yeah, I'm town, do this all the time". Like I said, either way could be a good way to scum me and that's pretty much why I didn't even bother trying to avoid that potential criticism (although you seem to be the first to have brought it up) because nothing I say will make a bit of difference to what you think there. Ultimately I have zero reason to be scared as long as I remember to keep putting out a big read post every day and night containing all my thoughts because as long as that's out I'm leaving my legacy behind for town to follow up on. Although I'd like to note that I didn't actually MEAN to "lead" the prplhz lynch here but the fact that Superbia kept blindly defending the guy for, in my view, no reason whatsoever was enough for me to dig through prpl's entire filter and pull it apart to wave it in front of Superbia. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:39 The Shining wrote: So it's acceptable when you do it to make a read more serious than it is for info purposes but it's not acceptable when someone is using it, amongst other things, to make a case? it's acceptable as an accoutrement to a case, but not as a keystone. also day 1 and day 2 reads should be quite different. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:38 y0su wrote: I don't really follow what my reads on you, tt, prp and super have to do with the overall question, I assume you're talking about d1 + Show Spoiler + FINAL VOTE COUNT: scott31337 (8) : -Celestial-, sicklucker, disformation, Half the Sky, y0su, FecalFeast, The Shining, Stutters695 Half the Sky (3) : disformation (1) : scott31337 prplhz (1) : Tictock -Celestial- (0) : sicklucker (0) : I don't see any reason that scum wouldn't want to disassociate from a ML. In terms of where they'd go, I think it would be easier to jump on another wagon than start their own. in a 9-3-1 vote, 2 mafia are very unlikely to be in the 3 is my point. like statistically improbable. i don't find your reads compelling enough for me to go against stats. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:28 prplhz wrote: hey guys i'm reading up now anything i should pay attention to? probably your head. you're about to lose it. what's your read on SL? Strongest T and S? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
I've also said that I'm not doing reads by association - I can't place 2 votes at a time anyway. Could you explain what was the significance of pointing out my TR on you and TT in relation to the voting? | ||
|
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:47 y0su wrote: It's a lot of excuses. Very scummy. His only "read" is a weak town on HtS in which he goes wifom to justify it being weak. That said, RL comes up so I'm not going to jump on him cause he's not the only one afk (or lurking). Y0su, it's still making excuses for me. The fact that you saw me make the mobile excuse myself and are using that for why you can call my read weak(really soft push, take a stance) but accept my RL excuse is bad. If you think I'm having trouble keeping up or because of real life, wouldn't that explain my "weak" read? You also haven't commented on the fact that you've been lying/misrepresenting me. I lold at your response to Super asking you what you think of my reads. "Trick question?" So you've alluded, more than once, that I have no reads this game. I pointed out my D1 reads. Why was there no reaction or conclusion after that? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I hate to say it, but I'm actually with prpl on this. You accuse me of trying to revise my d1 while blatantly slinging this shit? You had him as your 3rd/4th towniest person at like his 3rd or 4th post and now you're demanding he claim, which at best trades for a PR when we could just lynch him? I don't like that. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
I said I wasn't pressuring you because your RL excuses. I had posted earlier I was waiting for your d2 reads (still am) that's what I thought Super was referring to and why I asked him to show them. Your early reads seems fine and I'm just not a fan of the tone in some. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
| ||
| ||
