EPT[M][N]The Void Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:11 Holyflare wrote: I mean you're voting for marv here: which means you're on board with his wagon of pressure of if he does nothing he's mafia but then are critical of damdred for wanting to vote marv for the same reasons. It's pretty weird. Please quote the post where I criticized Damdred for voting marv. I am pretty sure I never did such a thing. | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:24 Holyflare wrote: You join vivax's train onto marv. Damdred gives his reasons to be on it which vivax agrees with. You maintain your vote on marv. You know their wagon is to pressure marv too see if he does anything and if he does he's probably not mafia - or at least might not be. You know this because you are reading the game and commented on their follow up posts. Yet, later you continue to go onto damdred points with things like: you add to kelsier point, you don't particularly weigh in but this comment looks like an agreement/criticism. Yet, we're still on you voting for marv despite you seemingly agreeing with kelsier about damd. It's weird that you stay on the marv wagon and even point out the damdred thing but still stay on the wagon which was made specifically for the reason damd pointed out Did my vote on Marvellosity seem very serious to you? Maybe you should have added this post to your little collection: | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:33 Holyflare wrote: So then why are you still voting for him with the person you're arguably most against? Why are you constantly overinterpreting the things I say? You are scraping the bottom of the barrel friend. | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:43 Holyflare wrote: Look, you've done literally nothing. Most people have done nothing. You do something that's inconsistent with the miniscule amount of nothingness that is provided and I'm going to push it until you come up with a coherent reason why you're doing your inconsistency and then I can move onto the next person who is being quite clearly obnoxious for no apparent reason. I want your thoughts on damdred that don't involve his post on oats that he hasn't explained yet. All I've seen is you agreeing that he wants to give an easy reason to town read marv later but fail to acknowledge the fact that that was what the wagon was about in the first place and instead ignore everything kelsier is pushing about it to have some kind of quarrel with me instead of just being transparent. There is no inconsistency. I agreed with the first argument Kelsier raised about Damdred. Later I clarified what he meant in one of his other posts because someone (you?) did not understand it. I did not say if I agree with it and to be frank I don't even know if I do. You want my thoughts on Damdred? He barely did anything. He weirdly jumped on oats when he was brought up and that's about it. | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote: I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next. 1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred? 2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out? a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax? b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points? 3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet? Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd. 1. I don't have a read on any player at this point. 2. His push on marv is not alignment indicative. I am familiar with marv's meta. 3. You are the one being obnoxious towards me. I am asking you why it matters because you are implying that I shouldn't be voting marv for the mentioned reason when earlier you said marv would be bussed. This question is not about them or me but about you because what you are saying makes no sense. | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 08:02 Holyflare wrote: You were pointing out things that make damdred look scummy. You were voting marv for a joke. You then pointed out things that make damdred's vote and talk about marv seem like it was easy to town read marv because he knows it's a town marv. You then say marv can be bussed and that's why your vote was still on him (even though it was a joke)? wut? by everything you were talking about and pointing out it looks like you would be thinking marv was town and damd mafia but maintained your vote on marv for no reason. ^ that's where the disconnect is happening. So, whatever, I'll leave you alone since you've explained your stuff. You are still putting words into my mouth. I will show you the timeline once last time: I voted Marvellosity. It was not a very serious vote which should be really really obvious if you read the thread. I pointed out something that makes damdred look scummy or rather I agreed with Kelsier about his point. -> the oats thing I told you the meaning of a different post by Kelsier which you did not seem to understand. Without giving any opinion on it. You attacked me for my vote since Damdred is voting for the same player after saying earlier that scum would probably bus marv. So why would you have a problem with my vote if you actually believed that I was serious about my vote and also strongly scumreading Damdred? | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 08:20 liancourt wrote: Obligatory sl vote is in order I assume sl = Sicklucker? Should I vote him too? | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 08:27 liancourt wrote: You are obligated Why? | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 08:51 Half the Sky wrote: You looked bad to me at that point because Damdred said (page 5) you'd be yelling lots and your initial reaction only supported his earlier statement that if you didn't care, you were likely mafia. He looked bad to you because he did not yell after a few pressure votes? Ok... Does he still look bad to you? | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 09:05 liancourt wrote: Hilarious because town never learns. Sl is a better day 1 lynch than either of them. If you want me to take you serious you will have to bring a few reasons to the table. | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 09:13 liancourt wrote: It sounds like you actually want to lynch sl if i gave u reasons outside of this game Does it? Maybe. Or maybe I am trying to find out why you are doing this because it isn't productive or helpful. Why are marv and oats worse lynch targets for example? | ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
| ||
|
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 20 2015 09:54 geript wrote: Also, tbh I only needed to read his post on Artanis story to know he's town. I didn't even bother reading anything else he wrote. Sounds totally believable to me. | ||
| ||
