|
|
|
|
|
On November 25 2014 12:41 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Completely not true. Back up your stats or you are lying and should die. I don't see why I have to play the game for you. Your mindset this game is totally off. You aren't interested in finding scum, you are interested in answering questions and posting for an okay amount. From what you say here, my lynch has much more reason than kush's lynch but you don't consider that at all. If all of this is true then your vote is in the right place and you should keep it there. Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:33 Alakaslam wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Well PLZ just kusplain the Kush policy? I don't think anything interesting is happening in the thread so I vote kush because he has a habit of not playing as scum. I don't see any harm in giving him a hill to climb, especially after last game.
???? So your continuation is "you're right".
I dont see how kush being scum last game makes him scum this game.
|
On November 25 2014 12:49 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:41 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Completely not true. Back up your stats or you are lying and should die. I don't see why I have to play the game for you. Your mindset this game is totally off. You aren't interested in finding scum, you are interested in answering questions and posting for an okay amount. From what you say here, my lynch has much more reason than kush's lynch but you don't consider that at all. If all of this is true then your vote is in the right place and you should keep it there. On November 25 2014 12:33 Alakaslam wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Well PLZ just kusplain the Kush policy? I don't think anything interesting is happening in the thread so I vote kush because he has a habit of not playing as scum. I don't see any harm in giving him a hill to climb, especially after last game. ???? So your continuation is "you're right". I dont see how kush being scum last game makes him scum this game.
Yeah, my continuation is "you're right." Now that you're right lets see where you take it.
|
Ouch but its early so ill let it slide. Well the idea with the kush policy lynch is more because we can crack him very easy. If we dont crack him we dont vote him
|
I just got back from playing Pokemon Trading Card game with some friends and went to a late dinner at Red Robin so sorry about my activity T_T
Breshke just seems to be mad at sicklucker for what happened in our previous game :O
Batsnacks lost his mind or he is scum trying to go after kush but kush didn't post anything just yet so I don't got a read on kush.
Oatsmaster is town in my eyes as he is being very constructive on the agenda for Day 1.
Are we allow to sleep on anyday because I remember in my last game we had slept for 1 day and I wondering if we are allowed to becausee personally I don't think Day 1 lynching is a good idea because of possible afks or just having horrible reads.
|
First person to vote LS for suggesting sleep is mafia.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
You are allowed to vote for a no-lynch.
|
|
|
##unvote
##vote: Oatsmaster
step it up oats
|
On November 25 2014 13:02 batsnacks wrote:
First person to vote LS for suggesting sleep is mafia.
This isint lylo like before so I wont 
|
On November 25 2014 13:13 batsnacks wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Oatsmaster
step it up oats
Now this makes no sense. Why not earlier? And how exactly do you expect me to step it up?
Trfel, why are sicklucker and hts even a little bit scum?
|
To be fair, LightningStrike does have a good reason to not lynch in Day 1. Last game he played, he posted extremely little in the first day, and was lynched. Turns out, he was the cop. Not that no lynch is a good idea, but him advocating it does not seem at all suspicious to me.
To respond to Oatsmaster:
On November 25 2014 07:26 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 07:23 Breshke wrote:On November 25 2014 07:14 sicklucker wrote:
boring im town again afk Looks like we found our d1 lynch already ##Vote: Sicklucker Are you voting him down because he's serious and just trolling or because you're a baddie trying to lynch a good guy? Granted this is my first ever TLM game so you probably know this lad more than I do...just saying. I can read that either way.
I don't really see a reason for Half the Sky to be asking the question asked in the first sentence. Obviously Breshke's vote was to force sicklucker back into the game, and was never a truly serious lynch vote (except a potential policy lynch). The fact that he brings this up potentially indicates that he may be scum, as this promotes indecision and doubt in the town (obviously town doesn't want to mis-lynch, but at the same time, if we are too worried about town errors we can't accomplish anything).
On November 25 2014 07:45 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 07:33 Breshke wrote:
[...] why did he feel the need to say that he was town and then why if he is town is he afking? As town you need to try find out peoples alignments so you want to post more ask questions w/e as scum you have no need for that. I am also seeing if he actually went afk or not. Alright, fair play. I had thought for some reason he was a vet who was just bored, and then seeing your last post, checked the list and no he's not a vet, so I stand corrected. I guess I'll be keeping a similar eye on him, and based on his reaction will vote accordingly. Although if he actually is town and trolling, he's not really helping his/our case. I agree, it is an eager time to vote him down now, but if he is town, that's exactly what the baddies want. Easy targets... So sicklucker, what's the deal?
Again, he references playing into the mafia's hands. Seems just a tad suspicious to me. Across these two posts, he hasn't really accomplished much, either. He's just said that he will keep an eye on sicklucker, and I would hope that everyone here would be keeping an eye on everyone else. Obviously this is nowhere near conclusive, I'm just not convinced that Half the Sky is town as some other people seem to be. It seems likely that he is a town player questioning something he didn't understand, but it's also possible that he is mafia who was trying to seem helpful but only impeding the progress of the town.
I was thinking that sicklucker seemed suspicious due to the "trap" at the start of the game, as well as the way he turned on Breshke for the early vote. Clearly the vote wasn't a serious vote, therefore it isn't rushed or hasty. Also, I remain inconclusive about Half the Sky, but sicklucker seemed a bit eager accept Half the Sky as town (since then, he has clarified that this claim is extremely tentative). This suggested that perhaps sicklucker and Half the Sky are both mafia (however, it's also quite likely that both are town). Sicklucker also has gone out of his way several times to say that he is town, which doesn't feel necessary, since everyone is going to say that they are town.
Again, nowhere near enough for an accurate read on anyone. I'll keep working on it.
|
whats your read on batsnacks?
|
|
|
On November 25 2014 14:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
whats your read on batsnacks?
I'm honestly not sure if it is better to policy lynch or no lynch. Either way, there are definitely conflicting views in this thread (LightningStrike on the no lynch side, batsnacks on the policy lynch side, for example), so if there was clearly a right answer, there wouldn't be an argument over this, since the town could just prove that their answer was correct, and everyone else would either accept it or be lynched. Therefore, I can't read into his vote on kushm4sta. It's easy to unvote later if necessary. Meanwhile, if the vote causes him to post more, great. However, repeatedly asking others to also vote kushm4sta does seem strange, since we probably should be more interested in getting people to talk now. If policy lynching is the correct route (which I'm not sure), we can worry about that closer to the vote deadline. I would definitely like batsnacks to let up on kushm4sta, that is something to potentially return to later.
I agree with batsnacks on his view of Half the Sky, as I previously stated. Definitely doesn't seem to me like as clear of a town read as some other people think.
Batsnacks also seems to have slightly hinted that you (Oatsmaster) could be scum, which I suppose is possible, but I don't really see evidence for at the moment. Other than that, he hasn't really shared any constructive thoughts. Therefore, I would hope that he would start being more constructive in the near future, particularly by pushing for information on people who are posting (as opposed to kushm4sta), or I could definitely read him as scum.
|
To be fair, kushm4sta, I would like some more from you. Batsnacks wants you to participate in the thread and share your thoughts, and that seems like a fair request. You obviously read batsnacks as scum. Any reasons we haven't mentioned yet? What about the rest of the people here?
|
On November 25 2014 13:00 LightningStrike wrote:
I just got back from playing Pokemon Trading Card game with some friends and went to a late dinner at Red Robin so sorry about my activity T_T
Breshke just seems to be mad at sicklucker for what happened in our previous game :O
Batsnacks lost his mind or he is scum trying to go after kush but kush didn't post anything just yet so I don't got a read on kush.
Oatsmaster is town in my eyes as he is being very constructive on the agenda for Day 1.
Are we allow to sleep on anyday because I remember in my last game we had slept for 1 day and I wondering if we are allowed to becausee personally I don't think Day 1 lynching is a good idea because of possible afks or just having horrible reads.
What else do you think?
And whos scum?
|
On November 25 2014 14:54 kushm4sta wrote:
##vote batsnacks
yeah thats right.
OMGUS HIS FACE.
|
On November 25 2014 14:57 Trfel wrote:I'm honestly not sure if it is better to policy lynch or no lynch. Either way, there are definitely conflicting views in this thread (LightningStrike on the no lynch side, batsnacks on the policy lynch side, for example), so if there was clearly a right answer, there wouldn't be an argument over this, since the town could just prove that their answer was correct, and everyone else would either accept it or be lynched. Therefore, I can't read into his vote on kushm4sta. It's easy to unvote later if necessary. Meanwhile, if the vote causes him to post more, great. However, repeatedly asking others to also vote kushm4sta does seem strange, since we probably should be more interested in getting people to talk now. If policy lynching is the correct route (which I'm not sure), we can worry about that closer to the vote deadline. I would definitely like batsnacks to let up on kushm4sta, that is something to potentially return to later. I agree with batsnacks on his view of Half the Sky, as I previously stated. Definitely doesn't seem to me like as clear of a town read as some other people think. Batsnacks also seems to have slightly hinted that you (Oatsmaster) could be scum, which I suppose is possible, but I don't really see evidence for at the moment. Other than that, he hasn't really shared any constructive thoughts. Therefore, I would hope that he would start being more constructive in the near future, particularly by pushing for information on people who are posting (as opposed to kushm4sta), or I could definitely read him as scum.
The right answer is to lynch scum.
Bleh, this whole post is wishy washy.
Is your final conclusion that he isnt town but isnt scum too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
