EPTOn October 11 2014 06:33 Holyflare wrote:
This isn't the reasons I'm giving for hopeless this is that obi did give reasons but kelsier is saying he isn't.
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2014 06:21 Grackaroni wrote:
I don't think these are very good reasons for scum reading Hopeless. These posts are a much more apt description of Palmar's play really.
On October 11 2014 05:33 Holyflare wrote:
Theres so much more than this too. If you said my reasons are good then by extension obi's are too. I don't thiiink I'd even written anything about hopeless at that point either.
You're scum reading obi further for not explaining his town read on me when he did and it actually makes sense (town reading him when he was under pressure etc) instead of jumping further on me whereas when hopeless exhibits all of these traits with far scummier motives you ignore him because of obi who IS actually explaining
On October 10 2014 00:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Alternatively we can lynch him for playing like mafia.
As in the majority of his filter is filler and he's basically avoided giving his opinion on almost anything at all, IE he's avoiding stepping on any toes.
I get that you're trying to analyze his actions, but if he doesn't take any actions at all there's not going to be a whole lot to analyze.
On October 09 2014 23:52 StorrZerg wrote:
then lets talk about hopeless..... i mean your around, your responding, help drive the conversation.
liancourt, avoided talking about hopeless day 1.
hopeless thought on Iian day 1, "Would #lynchwithfire"
yet dives on
at this point OO was an afk person that sure was "scummy" yet afk.
i'd also say hopeless doesn't really add anything to the case on Iian, more so just agrees with my reasoning and "bad list post" yet has far more posts directed to Iian, questioning him, and calling him scum yet we come to this.
Says he "wasn't interested" I think this is a contradiction to his actions, he was very interested in pushing liam, and his reason to vote OO was just "ill end up here"
On October 09 2014 23:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'm pretty focused on this hopeless lynch.
And I don't think I'm going to change my mind.
On October 09 2014 23:31 StorrZerg wrote:
fantastic coming from the person who got bored and wanted to talk about something yesterday.
If you want to change the subject thats fine
[] talk about liancourt
[] talk about hopeless
[] other [insert topic]
On October 09 2014 23:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Unimportant.
On October 09 2014 23:22 StorrZerg wrote:
what do you guys think of liancourt's reaction when dealing with HF, claiming vig/cop.
what do you guys think of liancourt's reaction when dealing with HF, claiming vig/cop.
Unimportant.
fantastic coming from the person who got bored and wanted to talk about something yesterday.
If you want to change the subject thats fine
[] talk about liancourt
[] talk about hopeless
[] other [insert topic]
I'm pretty focused on this hopeless lynch.
And I don't think I'm going to change my mind.
then lets talk about hopeless..... i mean your around, your responding, help drive the conversation.
liancourt, avoided talking about hopeless day 1.
hopeless thought on Iian day 1, "Would #lynchwithfire"
yet dives on
On October 08 2014 01:37 Hopeless1der wrote:
yeah i'll probably end up here anyways
##Vote: ObviousOne
On October 08 2014 01:35 Blazinghand wrote:
I'd like everyone to bear in mind that I've presented a reason to lynch OO that is imo valid entirely independent of the fact that I RNGed him. Yes, I did RNG him so I was going to write a case on him anyways, but bear in mind that that doesn't change the facts, and the facts are: OO isn't playing this game.
I'd like everyone to bear in mind that I've presented a reason to lynch OO that is imo valid entirely independent of the fact that I RNGed him. Yes, I did RNG him so I was going to write a case on him anyways, but bear in mind that that doesn't change the facts, and the facts are: OO isn't playing this game.
yeah i'll probably end up here anyways
##Vote: ObviousOne
at this point OO was an afk person that sure was "scummy" yet afk.
i'd also say hopeless doesn't really add anything to the case on Iian, more so just agrees with my reasoning and "bad list post" yet has far more posts directed to Iian, questioning him, and calling him scum yet we come to this.
On October 09 2014 11:11 Hopeless1der wrote:
because RNGesus told me to. No wait that was Blazinghand. same difference.
In all seriousness, it seemed inevitable and I wasnt interested in pushing damdred or lian over OO, especially since OO came in long enough to give us something and never return. I was willing to switch around up until I asked where the hell did he go?
On October 09 2014 11:09 Grackaroni wrote:
Hope why did you end up voting OO? You originally liked his tone and you were complaining about it being a policy lynch for a while.
Hope why did you end up voting OO? You originally liked his tone and you were complaining about it being a policy lynch for a while.
because RNGesus told me to. No wait that was Blazinghand. same difference.
In all seriousness, it seemed inevitable and I wasnt interested in pushing damdred or lian over OO, especially since OO came in long enough to give us something and never return. I was willing to switch around up until I asked where the hell did he go?
Says he "wasn't interested" I think this is a contradiction to his actions, he was very interested in pushing liam, and his reason to vote OO was just "ill end up here"
Alternatively we can lynch him for playing like mafia.
As in the majority of his filter is filler and he's basically avoided giving his opinion on almost anything at all, IE he's avoiding stepping on any toes.
I get that you're trying to analyze his actions, but if he doesn't take any actions at all there's not going to be a whole lot to analyze.
On October 10 2014 01:00 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Cool, a bunch of unexplained obvious townreads and a scumread that he never bothered to follow up on or pressure at any point.
On October 10 2014 00:55 Hopeless1der wrote:
that's not contradictory thats called being lazy. Would you have felt better if I afk'd my vote on Lian?
right now yes, still reading lian scum. haven't reread anything yet, at work. I'll try to give updated thoughts this evening.
My never-lynch list is HF BH grack palmar bats. aside from that I dont have much right now.
that's not contradictory thats called being lazy. Would you have felt better if I afk'd my vote on Lian?
right now yes, still reading lian scum. haven't reread anything yet, at work. I'll try to give updated thoughts this evening.
My never-lynch list is HF BH grack palmar bats. aside from that I dont have much right now.
Cool, a bunch of unexplained obvious townreads and a scumread that he never bothered to follow up on or pressure at any point.
Theres so much more than this too. If you said my reasons are good then by extension obi's are too. I don't thiiink I'd even written anything about hopeless at that point either.
You're scum reading obi further for not explaining his town read on me when he did and it actually makes sense (town reading him when he was under pressure etc) instead of jumping further on me whereas when hopeless exhibits all of these traits with far scummier motives you ignore him because of obi who IS actually explaining
I don't think these are very good reasons for scum reading Hopeless. These posts are a much more apt description of Palmar's play really.
This isn't the reasons I'm giving for hopeless this is that obi did give reasons but kelsier is saying he isn't.
Yeah I know. You said Obi gave good reasons. KSC said Obi didn't give good reasons. I'll have to side with KSC on this one.
