• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:10
CEST 10:10
KST 17:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 1 & 2 Added to Xbox Game Pass The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing CN community: Firefly accused of suspicious activities How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? Mihu vs Korea Players Statistics
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 33940 users

Catastrophe Mafia - Page 312

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 310 311 312 313 314 317 Next
yamato77
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
11589 Posts
April 22 2014 15:33 GMT
#6221
I was both in the town circle and did a lot of filter analysis that led to iamperfection and syllogism being checked and/or lynched. Everyone whining is ridiculous.
Writer@WriterYamato
Dandel Ion
Profile Joined November 2010
Austria17960 Posts
April 22 2014 15:33 GMT
#6222
Needed the invention to res BH so he resses more people so scum shoot the confirmed townies instead of me.
ez plan


but then scum was rewarded for being bad because lolroles
A backwards poet writes inverse.
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
April 22 2014 15:34 GMT
#6223
I was checked because I voted Tehpoofter. He could either check a person who voted for him or choose to check anyone, but that would raise chaos counter by 1.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
April 22 2014 15:34 GMT
#6224
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.
WaveofShadow
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada31494 Posts
April 22 2014 15:35 GMT
#6225
On April 23 2014 00:33 syllogism wrote:
We didn't actually know that. I think hosts shouldn't allow town to make such built-in anti-mafia mechanics into their inventions. Just getting hands on the invention is extremely difficult.

I heard there were other way more ridonkulous iterations that were rejected. On-the-fly hosting is tough with regards to inventions, man.
twitch.tv/waveofshadow ||| Winner of AHGL's So You Think You Can Cast! ||| Juicy Dad for lyfe ||| 'idk i get a kick out of stupid things' - Jarms Yarng
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
April 22 2014 15:36 GMT
#6226
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.
Dandel Ion
Profile Joined November 2010
Austria17960 Posts
April 22 2014 15:37 GMT
#6227
I think hosts shouldn't allow scum to make such mis-leading anti-town namings into their inventions. Just getting hands on the invention is extremely difficult.
A backwards poet writes inverse.
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
April 22 2014 15:39 GMT
#6228
That's not comparable at all, a non sequitur at best.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
April 22 2014 15:40 GMT
#6229
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-22 15:42:12
April 22 2014 15:41 GMT
#6230
On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.

What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does

(not that we wanted Oats to kill WoS at all, definitely not when he did)
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
April 22 2014 15:43 GMT
#6231
On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.

What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does

I agree that it makes him look a little suspicious, but if Oats pulled the exact same move, but actually claimed straight up that he needed Gandalf dead, it would have probably been less suspicious than a NK. Just pull a JAT, and claim that you think you're leaving the game or something, but have no clue when that doesn't happen.
WaveofShadow
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada31494 Posts
April 22 2014 15:47 GMT
#6232
On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.

What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does

(not that we wanted Oats to kill WoS at all, definitely not when he did)

Eh I sort of disagree. I guess delayed suspicion happened in this case as opposed to being suspicious right away, maybe you're right.

But either way I think the issue was that Oats decided to YOLOkill me in general rather than the usefulness of the invention (again, in the end it wasn't useful at all thanks to LSB---and even if you could have used LSB's ability for something else, it was super unpredictable considering how its use was resolved)---lol I could swear I remember Oats asking like a cycle before if he should YOLO as well. I would have died even earlier.
twitch.tv/waveofshadow ||| Winner of AHGL's So You Think You Can Cast! ||| Juicy Dad for lyfe ||| 'idk i get a kick out of stupid things' - Jarms Yarng
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
April 22 2014 15:48 GMT
#6233
Just wondering syllo, why did you want to fakeclaim me visiting kita? I just figured you would gain more by mislynching someone who was likely town over 3p.
WaveofShadow
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada31494 Posts
April 22 2014 15:48 GMT
#6234
On April 23 2014 00:43 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.

What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does

I agree that it makes him look a little suspicious, but if Oats pulled the exact same move, but actually claimed straight up that he needed Gandalf dead, it would have probably been less suspicious than a NK. Just pull a JAT, and claim that you think you're leaving the game or something, but have no clue when that doesn't happen.

Nah I still think that kill is a scumclaim considering how late in the game it was done---JAT's claim and the detail involved looks like legit 3P while the 3P Oats tried to claim especially considering how much he had lied to Palmar before looked shitty.
twitch.tv/waveofshadow ||| Winner of AHGL's So You Think You Can Cast! ||| Juicy Dad for lyfe ||| 'idk i get a kick out of stupid things' - Jarms Yarng
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
April 22 2014 15:53 GMT
#6235
On April 23 2014 00:48 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2014 00:43 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)

Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.

Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right?

The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game.

It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit.

Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it.

What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does

I agree that it makes him look a little suspicious, but if Oats pulled the exact same move, but actually claimed straight up that he needed Gandalf dead, it would have probably been less suspicious than a NK. Just pull a JAT, and claim that you think you're leaving the game or something, but have no clue when that doesn't happen.

Nah I still think that kill is a scumclaim considering how late in the game it was done---JAT's claim and the detail involved looks like legit 3P while the 3P Oats tried to claim especially considering how much he had lied to Palmar before looked shitty.

I agree 100% it is a scumclaim, but I think it is a scumclaim that doesn't implicate Sandro and the fact that the town circle is compromised which would be indicated if you were night killed. I just said oats should BS as much as possible but say that he needed you dead. People wouldn't believe it but then when he flipped, they would see that it was true and there wasn't going to be much suspicion on Sandro because of that YOLO kill that prevents a resurrection like there would normally.
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-22 15:59:31
April 22 2014 15:55 GMT
#6236
On April 23 2014 00:48 Amiko wrote:
Just wondering syllo, why did you want to fakeclaim me visiting kita? I just figured you would gain more by mislynching someone who was likely town over 3p.

I thought it would be easier to get a third party lynched (initially I thought you were lying about some aspects of your role and possibly couldn't win with mafia). Sandro was bussing me already over PMs and I thought I couldn't survive a PM day without insane effort or a claim like that. I didn't want to fake claim to anyone else as coming up with a reasonable fake claim takes effort. "Claiming" to Sandro on the other hand took no effort and possibly gave Sandro some town cred. Another issue was that I could only use my nuke within the first 24 hours of the day, so I had to know by that point whether I'm likely to get lynched or not.

I initially wanted to utilize Oat's role for my claim. That is, claim a third party who has to kill Gandalf to win, but we went with the tracker idea instead.

e: also my decision to track the person I claimed having tracked had to make sense. I could only choose either a suspicious looking townie (who might get mislynched later anyway) or a third party. In addition, the townie role claiming could have convinced town that I was lying.
VisceraEyes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States21170 Posts
April 22 2014 16:19 GMT
#6237
I didn't "basically claim scum" you dicks, it took the guy who was tunneling me all game long to lynch me with a mayor vote. I was town enough to survive a majority lynch if I had to. Anyone saying I "claimed scum" is wrong and should feel bad.
if I had to describe his playstyle, it'd be a coked up rabbit with the attention of a goldfish injecting caffeine into himself directly through an IV drip. it's like a reel of random animated shorts where things just blow up randomly
Koshi
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Belgium38797 Posts
April 22 2014 16:22 GMT
#6238
Who lynched you? Geript or snb?
I had a good night of sleep.
VisceraEyes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States21170 Posts
April 22 2014 16:24 GMT
#6239
Like I don't care if SnB was "certain" or whatever, at the time he lynched me he was confirming his bias. Period. If it was ANYONE else I could have talked my way out of it. My only play was to support someone else for mayor, but Sandroba had fucked off and if he HAD been around I figured I was /his/ lynch too. I admit that I clocked out on the day I got lynched but I maintain that I did what I could with what I had.

Perhaps not claiming to syllo was a misplay on my part. I chalk it up to paranoia due to experience.
if I had to describe his playstyle, it'd be a coked up rabbit with the attention of a goldfish injecting caffeine into himself directly through an IV drip. it's like a reel of random animated shorts where things just blow up randomly
VisceraEyes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States21170 Posts
April 22 2014 16:27 GMT
#6240
I'm just sad I lost on a scumteam with syllo and Sandroba. If I had been actually /on/ this scumteam the game would have been completely different I think.
if I had to describe his playstyle, it'd be a coked up rabbit with the attention of a goldfish injecting caffeine into himself directly through an IV drip. it's like a reel of random animated shorts where things just blow up randomly
Prev 1 310 311 312 313 314 317 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 50m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SC2_NightMare 61
ProTech52
OGKoka 51
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34829
Sea 4510
GoRush 651
ajuk12(nOOB) 133
Movie 49
Leta 47
BeSt 47
Sharp 44
Sacsri 27
Dota 2
XcaliburYe600
BananaSlamJamma303
League of Legends
JimRising 626
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1436
shoxiejesuss557
Other Games
WinterStarcraft538
Happy460
ceh9371
Mew2King257
crisheroes184
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4239
Other Games
gamesdonequick697
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH321
• LUISG 27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota269
League of Legends
• Stunt597
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 50m
WardiTV Invitational
2h 50m
PiGosaur Monday
15h 50m
GSL Code S
1d 1h
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
1d 15h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
GSL Code S
2 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Cheesadelphia
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.