EPTDoctor Who Mafia 2 - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I hate voting threads btw. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Otherwise i get yakked.  scum don't yak me, i claim scum if you do. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 30 2014 07:11 Alakaslam wrote: No that is exactly what you would do You have to There's no other way out of a one-on-one situation like this, and the meadow that you were using was my mood. But you couldn't read my mood until it became a skewer like this, which is too convenient. on top of this right now I'm being very serious, which is my Skymeadow. So, if you were town you'd probably be like "I'm down for this, yeah slam is scum" The fact that you actually believed i called you mafia makes you town.  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 30 2014 07:16 Alakaslam wrote: Alright I'll wait until i'm at sites to talk about voting. Talk text works okay when I'm driving, better than it used to, but I can't do BB code so . wait how does talk text work? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Here is a MSPaint picture to present more clear conclusion. I call it kitaman's unchanted web of disruption: ![[image loading]](http://i60.tinypic.com/316r9y8.png) Picture 1: Here is how townies do the "make other people think and see if you can catch lazy people because they are more likely to be mafia and draw retarded conclusions" thingy (at least how i do it). You present your argument. If you get questioned for it you answer the questions clearly -> in the end you form a conclusion/read regarding the argument and how people reacted to it, did they care about what you were really saying and why.. etc etc.. Picture 2: Here is how kitaman does it. He makes an unclear argument and when people question him about it he does not answer but instead makes another unclear argument about the question. Repeat until noone can remember what was the original point and what the fuck we are even arguing about. Then he might posts some conclusions, a day or so later. I've seen a couple of mafia players do this and it works really well because most of the players tire out and just stop arguing because it's so annoying and in the end you can't make anything out of it anyways because it takes about 5 hours to get an answer to a simple question. Now i gotta figure out if kita does this only as mafia or does he do this as town too (or maybe only as town?), because as far as i can remember in my games with him (besides Aperture 2, but i didn't really play properly in that game) either one of us or both of us have always been mafia. Standby for answers. Too lazy to do research now so maybe later today. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 30 2014 15:00 thrawn2112 wrote: how long did those pics take you About the time from my last post -> to that one. In case it's unclear. It's like normally people give you a puzzle to solve and slowly give you pieces to the puzzle along the way. Then they assume townies complete the puzzle and mafia tries to force the pieces in wrong order. kitaman gives you a puzzle, then he gives you pieces to 10 different puzzles and i don't even know if he wants you to try to solve the original puzzle. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 30 2014 15:08 thrawn2112 wrote: no i know. I hope that you follow through with the research becaause otherwise you just wasted 30 minutes did you have an opinion about kita in mind before you started that? On March 30 2014 15:09 Tehpoofter wrote: @rayn what post this game brought up this thought train on kita? The RVS thing? or just a meta ideA? To answer you both. I originally voted for him because he did vote me in the exact same manner in Lotr game as scum and i wanted him to give his reasoning here (i don't remember if he does random voting in nearly every game, probably does if he says so). But anyways i usually tend to think even if people vote for someone for reactions there is a reason why they pick their target whoever it is as i think completely random voting is just retarded as it doesn't really achieve anything. Or it can achieve something but you don't have the "this is what town would do <--> this is what scum would do" in comparsion to "idk let's see what happens" which is dumb. My read got stronger when he went after thrawn because i don't think thrawn has done anything scummy and i can see his logic behind the me/kita vote. It makes sense to me but kita is building the web for some reason. I think it's distracting and therefore scummy. I don't see what he is trying to achieve. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 30 2014 07:11 Amiko wrote: having gatorade or wine? I'm following thread but don't have much to say on the meta discussions, will get a little food and come back! On March 30 2014 08:28 Amiko wrote: @kitaman27 or @Hopeless1der: I don't really get the interactions between rayn & slam, if it's important can you explain it to me (or if it doesn't matter can you let me know)? These two posts. Only posts from him with real content. thrawn what's wrong in these posts? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
So if you could explain this Amiko it would be nice. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Elaborate more please. | ||
| ||
