|
On March 01 2014 02:49 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 14:56 Sylencia wrote:On February 27 2014 14:27 Oatsmaster wrote: dont be so pessimistic. Whos most likely scum? Not pessimistic, just realistic. Pretty sure no lynch gives us more info anyways unless the doctor dies n0. At the moment I've only got sn0 as his n0 contribution was pretty lackluster but that's pretty thin reasoning. I'd like to point out that Syl is advocating a no-lynch here yet didn't vote no-lynch when the day actually rolled around.
And he obediently followed whatever Oatsmaster said and ignored other players such as his greencheck and Artanis/JJD.
|
On February 28 2014 14:04 Sylencia wrote: :| Don't worry about me, I'm too naive about scum fake checks.
##Vote Xatalos
This also includes "playing the noob card" and "not having any conviction in your own ideas whatsoever".
|
Actually, if Oats is town, then I'm the most likely NK (since then JJD could easily get Oats mislynched without my check). But that seems pretty unlikely.
|
On February 28 2014 23:42 Sylencia wrote:Proper readup tomorrow - karaoke has me drained. However, I noticed one post that stuck out from Xat for me: Show nested quote +On February 28 2014 19:35 Xatalos wrote: Actually one of the best scenarios would be if I flipped. In that case you and Sylencia would be pretty much confirmed scum. It's a valiant attempt to gain town cred by trying to martyr, but if you think about it from his perspective it doesn't really show much towniness does it? If he was the town cop, if he died, we'd gain +1 scum in me, but then town would have 66% chance to lose if the NK is the doc/non-protected guy. Doesn't really sound like a good tradeoff to me. However, he's been pushing for a no lynch because it's apparently better to have us completely confused over the cop checks even more on day 2 if there are differing results. Basically he offers the self-sacrifice yet pushes no lynch. That's scum yo.
Lolz. How does Sylencia go from thinking that it's beneficial for town to no-lynch to soon use my stance of no-lynching as proof of me being scum? This is such a radical and complete change in his views that it can't be real.
|
Well, if nobody dies, then most likely someone was saved... And the Doc will know who.
|
Indeed
|
What did you think about my "something interesting" WIFOM last night?
|
Although it's no longer really relevant.
|
If I get Oats as a redcheck I might vote for him first, though, since I'd be only 99.9999% certain about Sylencia and 100% certain about Oats.
|
I feel like this battle is being waged only in the ScumQT and the Doctor's head. It's pretty boring really.
|
I heavily doubt it's JJD, but we'll see.
|
Oh ok. Actually English isn't my main language so I somehow imagined that "conspicuously" meant "incidentally" (as in they were absent from the thread while posting in ScumQT).
|
It feels so refreshing though to have both my role and my opinions out in the open. I can't imagine the pains that Artanis goes through.
|
Hm. You're pretty likely to die so I think I'd rather have your reads than WIFOM by hiding them completely, though.
|
Although I guess you don't have anything unusual if you're not concerned about sharing them...
|
|
|
On March 01 2014 13:19 Sylencia wrote:Pretty sure I've solved the game, but I can't really say much about the doctor until D2. Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 03:55 Xatalos wrote:On February 28 2014 23:42 Sylencia wrote:Proper readup tomorrow - karaoke has me drained. However, I noticed one post that stuck out from Xat for me: On February 28 2014 19:35 Xatalos wrote: Actually one of the best scenarios would be if I flipped. In that case you and Sylencia would be pretty much confirmed scum. It's a valiant attempt to gain town cred by trying to martyr, but if you think about it from his perspective it doesn't really show much towniness does it? If he was the town cop, if he died, we'd gain +1 scum in me, but then town would have 66% chance to lose if the NK is the doc/non-protected guy. Doesn't really sound like a good tradeoff to me. However, he's been pushing for a no lynch because it's apparently better to have us completely confused over the cop checks even more on day 2 if there are differing results. Basically he offers the self-sacrifice yet pushes no lynch. That's scum yo. Lolz. How does Sylencia go from thinking that it's beneficial for town to no-lynch to soon use my stance of no-lynching as proof of me being scum? This is such a radical and complete change in his views that it can't be real. I'm using your stance of no lynch because you're saying "Hey, kill me because it's good" while advocating no lynch to gain town cred. Do you read?
Why exactly am I scum for either supporting a no-lynch or mentioning that my death would benefit town?
|
|
Probably best to post your reads at deadline.
|
|
|
|