| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 08 2014 17:07 geript wrote: Actually, instead of answering that VE, tell me if you plan to approach Cora using the GERIPT IN THE GAME (tm) approach to Cora. That's the best option imo. I don't know what this means, but Cora is feeling fine to me for now. Inquisitive enough and active enough to not lynch for me. | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 18:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I think voting analysis is going to be especially helpful in this setup in general. Plus I filtered you and looked for Alak instead of Slam. -.- Okay, you made me feels better for now. But to clarify, you would categorize everything Slam has done so far as trolling and non-alignment indicative? He said "this is going to be me this game" or something like that. It's "categorically indecipherable" Slam. Not "posts are in plain English" Slam. His Cora vote was trolling, and the rest of it is incomprehensible Spamaslam. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Didn't care for this bit: On February 08 2014 12:25 Corazon wrote: Alright, I will give it a break. I just thought the conversation about Geript was going nowhere, so I wanted to throw it out there. @Oats: 4 people in this game are scum. When I figure out who is scum, I'll let you know babycakes  Shoots down Oats for Oats' dumb "who is scum?" question, then On February 08 2014 16:22 Corazon wrote: Geript, when do you plan on actually trying to find scum? Just curious. Turns around and does the same stupid thing. I, unlike you, give him no townie points for the Slam questions because it was a silly thing to ask anyway. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato, you were really good in the last nomination game if i remember correctly. I would say discussing townreads (or giving out townreads in general in a scale people usually do) helps mafia in the nomination phase, as they can more likely tell who would people vote for over who. Agreed? I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
@VE it was about your plan on how to handle me from your QT with BH. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:03 yamato77 wrote: I said this last game and got yelled at for it, but yeah, I agree. Town should be quiet during the dawn about ANY reads, really. Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:10 geript wrote: Fuck no. That's the question he's referring to. I remember this specifically from the podcast; I think you and Mocsta were all for it. It's dumb. That's another 24 hours we have to scumhunt and the nomination day is short. Fuck that plan and you're scummy for supporting it. No, it's smart play. There's no reason to let scum have any more information about your reads after the flip. Nomination days are literally the least useful days for scumhunting anyway. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
VE and geript what's it exactly you think is wrong with yamato? I certainly do not argee with the inactvity comment, you might wanna elaborate on that geript. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:12 yamato77 wrote: No, it's smart play. There's no reason to let scum have any more information about your reads after the flip. Nomination days are literally the least useful days for scumhunting anyway. No... the plan was scum favored and scum helped push it. Ask VE. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:15 geript wrote: No... the plan was scum favored and scum helped push it. Ask VE. Whatever dude. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 08 2014 18:53 VisceraEyes wrote: I don't know what this means, but Cora is feeling fine to me for now. Inquisitive enough and active enough to not lynch for me. Do you think asking about Slam's vote or geript's scumhunting strategy counts as inquisitive? | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: VE and geript what's it exactly you think is wrong with yamato? I certainly do not argee with the inactvity comment, you might wanna elaborate on that geript. My perception of yam is as a pretty active/posty type player in the early game. So a quick fucking off has weird feels. I'll talk to you more in the morning, I'm struggle to stay awake. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 08 2014 18:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I think voting analysis is going to be especially helpful in this setup in general. Plus I filtered you and looked for Alak instead of Slam. -.- Okay, you made me feels better for now. But to clarify, you would categorize everything Slam has done so far as trolling and non-alignment indicative? Even given the massive amount of bussing that went on last Nomination? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On February 08 2014 19:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: yamato has already posted ~10posts less than he did in all GoT game on D1. Not to mention that game had a house election on N0 so there was a shitton more to talk about on D1. He has also posted more than in the whole Sicilian game (which had the posting limit so i don't even get why you bring that game up in the first place) so i would really like you to show me where you are basing this argument. Looks like I was just misremembering. I only remembered this post: On February 08 2014 12:52 yamato77 wrote: Does anyone actually have anything useful to say or can I ignore this thread for ~24 hours? Thinking he popped in and then fucked off. Guess I'm going to have to start taking notes since reading and playing lol doesn't work | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On February 08 2014 11:40 Corazon wrote: I'm curious as to why Slam threw a troll vote on me and then ran off. Do you guys think this is part of Slam's personality or a way to get him off the hook for inactivity early in the game? (I'm asking this because while I have a rough idea of Slam's playstyle, I don't know if these troll votes are what he does). Phoneposting Catching this strikes me---wtf 'off the hook' like an hour into the game? And then VE being all smiley about it---VE why did YOU let Cora off the hook for this especially considering how easily he backed down from an obviously dumb comment Something about this interaction man | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On February 08 2014 15:23 Oatsmaster wrote: sorry bro, just got home and ate lunch. You gonna be serious now? Oats seems concerned about Geripts vote on him but at the same time he's right that geripts play doesn't seem to be serious? Trolly and yet interspersed with real (but not good) play Dunno Risen totes town though Feels | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
GSL
Yamato Cup
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
