|
On January 26 2014 22:46 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty unlikely, I'd say.
Partly because of the players in the game (sensible), partly because most of the time mafia ##bigplays are usually borne out of the situation at hand, not pre-planned/done randomly
Alright 'cause my mind keeps wandering...and I worry that if Fool is town we may lose flat out because it means everyone has had the wrong train of thought all game.
Who are your top 2 atm?
|
On January 26 2014 22:52 marvellosity wrote:
Put it this way: if you're mafia, I'm extremely impressed with your effort and commitment this cycle.
Lol and if I'm town?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 26 2014 22:53 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 26 2014 22:46 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty unlikely, I'd say.
Partly because of the players in the game (sensible), partly because most of the time mafia ##bigplays are usually borne out of the situation at hand, not pre-planned/done randomly Alright 'cause my mind keeps wandering...and I worry that if Fool is town we may lose flat out because it means everyone has had the wrong train of thought all game. Who are your top 2 atm?
Without great thought, Toad + Fool. Just lots of people looking townie to me really. The posts from Fool that I read in my catchup made me feel worse about him, not better.
Still banking on 2 mafia being in toad+fool+kita, finding it really hard to see any other options.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 26 2014 22:53 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 26 2014 22:46 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty unlikely, I'd say.
Partly because of the players in the game (sensible), partly because most of the time mafia ##bigplays are usually borne out of the situation at hand, not pre-planned/done randomly Alright 'cause my mind keeps wandering...and I worry that if Fool is town we may lose flat out because it means everyone has had the wrong train of thought all game. Who are your top 2 atm?
Try me. I can only tell you you're stupid, after all.
|
On January 26 2014 23:01 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 26 2014 22:53 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 26 2014 22:46 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty unlikely, I'd say.
Partly because of the players in the game (sensible), partly because most of the time mafia ##bigplays are usually borne out of the situation at hand, not pre-planned/done randomly Alright 'cause my mind keeps wandering...and I worry that if Fool is town we may lose flat out because it means everyone has had the wrong train of thought all game. Who are your top 2 atm? Try me. I can only tell you you're stupid, after all.
Oh trust, I know and its never stopped me.
I've already said the little I've considered on it (I think last night to gonzaw). I'm sure I could delve deeper but its not productive atm because there's way too much there without any real answers.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I kinda wish Prome wouldn't be absent so constantly, it makes me a little paranoid.
And +1 input is always just good anyways.
|
Do you agree that he is 'confirmed town' as Fool has een saying all game?
If so for how long have you believed it and have you been questioning it at all?
Why/why not?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
well if the scumteam is prome/fool/sand, then i'll eat BH's hat.
And if it's prome/sand/x, it's just ridiculous that sand came into a delicate thread situation bussing Prome.
Doesn't make sense. So, since N1 more or less i guess.
I'd add that Prome has kinda afked as town before (## mafia)
|
He said his weekend activity suffers; I don't have huge reason to question that since his activity in this game WAS better during the week.
Alright so if there was one (or for bonus derp points, two) scum on sandroba, which would be the most likely and why?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
austin, for ignoring the Fool stuff day 1 and specifically not wanting to lynch into him on that day, and starting to want to sometime after the lynch.
second=Prome, for full derp points. sandroba bussing Prome for no reason in particular, gonzaw makes a case on sand, austin jumps on (as mafia) thinking that a late switch won't happen and fool will get lynched, prome follows hapa for credit (he'll have seen hapa's vote already)
Dunno why i played this game :p
|
Gonzaw, VE and I were town in LI, agree?
So far all I'm seeing from you about WoS is about his activity, I go back to his posts, especially those about VE and they just don't make sense. You even pointed it out yourself. How is it that the activity of WoS alone is enough to make him town in your eyes? I just don't get it and you seem to be the only one thinking that way, so what gives?
Anyways I'm off to my place by train and will check out Kita's filter when I'm home. It's probably going to be a decision between Kita and Foolish tomorrow, so I'll focus on those 2.
|
Toad, i think wave seems more townie, msrv thinks hes more townie, austin thinks hes more townie, kita rhinks hes more townie, orome thinks hes more townie. Im not thr only one. Im kind of worried how you dont see the same stuff as we do
Idem about Foo..but erll at least you are trying to figure it out now hes not
|
On January 27 2014 00:36 Toadesstern wrote:
Gonzaw, VE and I were town in LI, agree?
So far all I'm seeing from you about WoS is about his activity, I go back to his posts, especially those about VE and they just don't make sense. You even pointed it out yourself. How is it that the activity of WoS alone is enough to make him town in your eyes? I just don't get it and you seem to be the only one thinking that way, so what gives?
Anyways I'm off to my place by train and will check out Kita's filter when I'm home. It's probably going to be a decision between Kita and Foolish tomorrow, so I'll focus on those 2.
There's a great deal of 'wat' in this post.
Lessee who else picks up on it.
|
|
|
On January 26 2014 10:03 Foolishness wrote:
There's no case against me lol
If I happened to miss a case against me find it and quote it for me so I can respond to it.
I'm willing to lynch Foo only based on this alone.
You have to be nearsighted to not notice all the crap posted about Foo, all the cases, all the votes, etc. Like kita said, there have been at least 4 or 5 of them (I'd say more), starting from the 18th page of this game!
This is evidence Foo is not reading the thread, or not giving enough shit about it to remember it.
On January 26 2014 22:17 marvellosity wrote:
Fool's interactions with the sand lynch were also "too obvious". Do you think Fool connected himself to his two scumbuddies like that? I said before that Fool has no problem blatantly pushing a mafia agenda, but damn.
Well, the issue is that he DID interact "too obviously" with a scum sandro, there's no denying that. Would a town Foo act that way? Because if not, the only thing left is scum Foo, yes, "blatantly pushing a mafia agenda".
|
I can only pad my filter so much.
Seems some people are afraid of the big bad scummers.
Not meeeee though!
|
|
|
Anyways, reading back my filter I remembered a good point I had against Holy I believe:
On January 23 2014 02:29 gonzaw wrote:
There's something weirdly interesting about the Holy issue. It seems contradictory in a sense.
First, okay, yes, he did scummy shit; but that's irrelevant to my point. What happened, is that basically everybody is suspicious of him or accusing him. Not a single soul is defending him.
I counted myself, marv, kita, Prome, Hapa and Foo basically saying "yeh he likely scum", and nobody else is defending him, just saying "I dunno" or "maybe I could vote for him".
It's weird, in the sense....that if he's scum somebody would defend him, right? But then comes the other interesting part: he has not a single vote on him.
I mean, think about it. I basically straight up called him scum. Hapa too. kita now does too. Foo said "Gonzaw's catch on Holyflare's contradiction is really damning and I'm almost ready to pull the trigger just on that". Prome agreed with Hapa and mentioned other stuff. Yet, not a single one of those (myself included) put a vote on him yet. Not only that, not a single one of the other people "not sure" or whatever put a vote on him either.
I can imagine 2 scenarios: There is scum in those guys I mention, and there is scum in the guys NOT mentioned (like sandro, austin, WOS). If the guys I mentioned are scum, and Holy town, then surely they have an easy target right? They can park their vote on Holy, and be totally fine since 80% of the thread is against Holy (unless they don't want to be the first ones to do it or some shit).
If the other guys I mentioned are scum (or rather, there is scum among them), then wouldn't this also be a good chance to park a vote on Holy? All the town "heavyweights" (who are pushing Holy) agree with a Holy lynch, so if you are austin scum, or WOS scum, or maybe sandro scum, or VE scum, etc, wouldn't you be VERY comfortable parking a vote on him? It's much more easier to pick Holy than to act "clueless town" and basically engage the thread in discussions and the like.
So, why is nothing like that happening?
I think this can make it more likely Holy is scum, based on how the thread is interacting with him. That would make sense, the townies find him scummy, and the scum are slightly bussing him (since Holy isn't even voted yet), or leaving the door open to bus him (if, for instance, VE or WOS are scum).
I'll see what you guys think. I think a Holy lynch might actually be a good D1 lynch....but then again I think a D1 Foo lynch seems good too, and I don't want to "save" a scum Foolishness from today's lynch (if he is indeed scum).
However, this was basically ignored after Holy came with this "I'm subbing out post".
Also, most people (austin primarily) just saw the "Nobody is defending Holy" part of the post, but didn't pay attention to the "Nobody is FoSing Holy" one.
So, considering this might be good info to determine Toad's alignment, what do you guys think about it, on top of all the info we already have?
|
Helloooooooooooooo.
Anybody here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
