EPTYes. I found it pretty trolly.
Can I expect more of the same here?
Resistance 3 - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Yes. I found it pretty trolly. Can I expect more of the same here? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On December 27 2013 07:54 Adam4167 wrote: Yes. I found it pretty trolly. Can I expect more of the same here? I'll be good.  | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I am town. Take me on missions. Trust me and dont worry about me. Koshi is town. Town is Koshi. You are screwed scummers. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I can take grilling. I am active. Pick me and be sure of at least 1 townie. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I am town. Who doubts me? Who dares to doubt me? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
But beware. Town or scum. Come after me And you will get lynched It has been proven. Koshi doesnt get lynched. Koshi is always town. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
GN all. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Koshi, if you are going to prove you are town by trolling, I am going to be really sad | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On December 27 2013 08:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Is the voting really non-anonymous? That's not how it usually is in resistance so just to clarify. Yes, Resistance 2 had non-anonymous voting so I am following that precedent. I also personally think it makes the game more balanced. EDIT: I know the hosts of Resistance 2 had a slightly higher degree of anonymity by requesting people to vote via pm, but I think I need to make the votes more transparent in lieu of the modified rules. In this game it is harder for the Resistance to win than it was in Resistance 2 because of the amount of people sent for each mission. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On February 15 2012 05:31 EchelonTee wrote: oof I'm tempted. I'll do resistance 3 when it comes. Anyways, do you think there is ever a scenario where the leader SHOULDNT send themselves on a team? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Hmm..i disagree with rayn about voting usually being anonymous. I guess my friends play with weird rules. I'm used to IRL voting where a choice is selected with a hidden tile and then revealed all at once, then votes are tallied and you know who voted for what and have that as information to analyze. Yes this is exactly what i mean. Now the voting is different, like you would lay your choice on the table face up but you are allowed to change that. Usually the voting is done via PM's and then revealed when the phase is finished. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On December 24 2013 10:52 FirmTofu wrote: 1. You get one chance to vote, so make it count. 2. That is correct, spies cannot communicate with one another at all. (Not even in a quicktopic) We cant change our votes though (unless I misread you rayn) | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 27 2013 09:46 Hopeless1der wrote: Hmm..i disagree with rayn about voting usually being anonymous. I guess my friends play with weird rules. I'm used to IRL voting where a choice is selected with a hidden tile and then revealed all at once, then votes are tallied and you know who voted for what and have that as information to analyze. Anyways, do you think there is ever a scenario where the leader SHOULDNT send themselves on a team? Yes, the scenario that springs to mind for me is when the entire town has someone labelled as scum and its their turn to lead, then its in their best interest to remove themselves from the team and send their top 3 townreads, as it'll just be downvoted if they include themselves. Chances are their team is getting downvoted anyway since people aren't going to trust their team, but if they send 3 people I have town reads on, I really don't care who suggests it. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Anyways Hopeless, you seem to have played Resistance. Why would you not have an opinion of if the leader should not pick themselves in any situation? I find it hard to believe tbh. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On December 27 2013 10:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: hmm.. okay. Anyways Hopeless, you seem to have played Resistance. Why would you not have an opinion of if the leader should not pick themselves in any situation? I find it hard to believe tbh. I think the leader should ALWAYS pick themselves. Sitting yourself out of a team is like self-voting for a lynch imo. If you know you are of the resistance, you should absolutely be going in your mind. Unless the game has been trivialized because the spies derped and all 3 sabotage the first mission, I think the leader is always going to have a spot on the team. I would vote no on any team that didnt include the current leader for this reason, regardless of what town sentiment was at that time. | ||
| ||
