EPTWait, what? Do I think he's scum this game? What the fuck are you even asking Rayn. I was talking about my familiarity with WoS scum play in the only game he's been scum in and it looks like you're saying you think I have a scum read on him this game? What's going on here? Can we please drop this nonsense that has nothing to do with Witchcraft?
Witchcraft Mini Mafia II - Page 16
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
Wait, what? Do I think he's scum this game? What the fuck are you even asking Rayn. I was talking about my familiarity with WoS scum play in the only game he's been scum in and it looks like you're saying you think I have a scum read on him this game? What's going on here? Can we please drop this nonsense that has nothing to do with Witchcraft? | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Though rayn was being oblivious and threatening votes for bad reasons. OO still overreacted pretty hard. Thoughts? | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 05 2013 05:01 Sn0_Man wrote: OO's awful paranoid or something. Though rayn was being oblivious and threatening votes for bad reasons. OO still overreacted pretty hard. Thoughts? I think your argument is rather shit. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Vanesco
United States105 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: raynpelikoneet I still don't really like Umasi's points but rayn's posts just seem like general scum play: distract town, spam, avoid giving reasons to reads. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 05 2013 05:14 Sn0_Man wrote: you didn't sound mad you sounded afraid. Describe to me exactly the difference between "mad" and "frustrated" and "afraid" and how they sound different if you're going to go down this path. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 05 2013 05:25 Sn0_Man wrote: You are like, incredibly desperate to justify yourself. If you weren't so uptight I'd be leaving it alone. Actually I was leaving it alone ur the one pushing it lol. I'm asking you to justify your stance and you're deflecting having to do that by... doing whatever this is? Hi scum. ##Unvote gumshoe ##Vote Sn0_Man | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Your response is painful. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
Vote remains. Still dunked. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
Vote Sn0 guys. Confirmed scum. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 04 2013 15:06 Vanesco wrote: So it seems that from all this negative feedback on me not voting that after thinking somebody is very scummy a vote is typical action. From my POV it seemed better not to vote because I don't like lurkers to just get a free ride by latching on, but after seeing the responses I have to agree with most of them and it was a bad play by me. Therefore: ##Vote: Umasi On November 04 2013 15:50 Vanesco wrote: Well I agree with the reasoning which is why I decided to vote. Also since many people commented on it, it seems like a fairly normal thing to do on TL mafia and since I plan on playing many more games, it would be foolish not to adapt. Overall, regardless whether I was voting for him or not, I still stand by Umasi being one of my scum reads. This is sticking out to me a little bit, but it's a sort of sublime reason. He's brutally honest that he's conforming to expectations. Heads off any argument about how he's conforming by stating it blatantly. That's a pretty good play if he's scum, but as he's apparently not familiar with the site meta of the regular players I feel semi-forgiving regarding it and think it's in the realm of possibility for coming from a town POV. On November 05 2013 03:35 Vanesco wrote: Sure OO. Echelon has stated how he disagrees with the strategy by hz and later on agrees on my point about the strategy that hz posted can be used against town. The strategy post he makes later on I am actually fine with (claiming roles when there are no blue able to be voted in) because at this point scum cannot use the vigi shot against the blues. To me it seems like there is no downside which is why I am fine with that type of strategy post. I also like how he just calms down the argument between hz, WoS, Onegu since it seems like scum would want more useless arguments happening in the game and would have just let it continue. He hasn't really offered much of his reads so far in the game but I do think that what he has done so far seems more in favor of town play then scum play. As I have mentioned before, after Syl's first response to me I didn't really see anything scummy in it and so I put him back in null. This is what makes me lean from null to slightly town. Even tho I show a clear flaw in the plan he still sticks to it and if I'm understanding him correctly, it seems that had I not pointed out the flaw it would have been a greater benefit for town than for scum. Although I disagree with the idea, he doesn't change his case even after evidence has been shown why it might be a bad idea and isn't afraid to stand by his motion. Everybody that I have not mentioned I have a null read on. Combined with this, I think any Vanesco should move their votes immediately. Of which there is only one, Umasi. Hrm. Time to take a deeper peek. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On November 05 2013 06:04 ObviousOne wrote: Umasi is now a person of interest. Meta-mechanics discussion/finger pointing is the core of his contribution. I have nothing to comment of, I still think vanesco is the best lynch. I won't discuss townreads at all, because nightkills, and I have no significant scumread other than vanesco, just people who are kinda scummy. | ||
| ||
