however in the event that you can't convince anyone, Sagaz I'd recommend you switch your vote to Vonthin because otherwise you are 100% throwing away your vote.
Newbie Mini Mafia XLIX - Page 18
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
however in the event that you can't convince anyone, Sagaz I'd recommend you switch your vote to Vonthin because otherwise you are 100% throwing away your vote. | ||
![]()
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
I'm in the camp that thinks mitt is bad townie. I agree with everyone criticizing July, but Vonthin is also suspicious and closer to getting lynched. I'd rather put my vote toward him to try and lynch someone other than mitt. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
SagaZ (0): playerboy345 (0): istandwithmitt (4): GGTeMpLaR, OdinOfPergo, Vonthin (5): Bereft, playerboy345, Seuss, nyxnyxnyx, onlywonderboy nyxnyxnyx (2): Vonthin, E00e July617 (1): SagaZ Not voting (1): Balla24 Currently, Vonthin is set to be lynched. to deadline. Remember, voting is mandatory! If there are errors, please let us know. | ||
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 16 2013 07:29 Bereft wrote: Seuss, if you can gather enough steam from town on this, fwiw I'd be willing to switch from Vonthin to July. however in the event that you can't convince anyone, Sagaz I'd recommend you switch your vote to Vonthin because otherwise you are 100% throwing away your vote. It's preferable at this point if we vote Vonthin. We can read a lot more into the positions of other people based on how he flips than we can if we suddenly turn around and lynch July. If Vonthin flips Mafia we can read a lot into people's votes. If he flips town we can be pretty certain July isn't mafia, which will cease the abusing relationship between his head and his desk I am at fault for. So I second your motion regarding SagaZ vote | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
I would much rather vote nyx, as his reasonings for his plays aren't anywhere to be found. It's just random posting and blindly following other people. Then the reaction vote on Vonthin? How is that not super strange? Vonthin and July showed their opinion on the Odin gamestart talk, and immediately that puts them under suspicion? Why? It's not like their positions were super scum-like. Their contribution levels are similar to nyx's if not more. ##vote: nyxnyxnyx | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
On October 16 2013 07:46 Seuss wrote: It's preferable at this point if we vote Vonthin. We can read a lot more into the positions of other people based on how he flips than we can if we suddenly turn around and lynch July. If Vonthin flips Mafia we can read a lot into people's votes. If he flips town we can be pretty certain July isn't mafia, which will cease the abusing relationship between his head and his desk I am at fault for. So I second your motion regarding SagaZ vote Why do you think july can't be mafia if vonthin is town again? They haven't done anything pair-worthy besides being in agreement. There isn't really any evidence to support the fact that they are against/together. There never is this early in the game. | ||
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
I'll switch my vote now in case i don't make it back it time. ##unvote ##Vote: Vonthin Didn't realize day 1 was ending this soon, so I agree we just don't have time to gather enough steam. He looks like a solid lynch, already talked about it in an earlier post. | ||
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 16 2013 07:53 Balla24 wrote: Why do you think july can't be mafia if vonthin is town again? They haven't done anything pair-worthy besides being in agreement. There isn't really any evidence to support the fact that they are against/together. There never is this early in the game. If July is mafia and Vonthin is not, it's to July's advantage to kill Vonthin over mitt. The town is already largely against mitt, so killing him doesn't really accomplish anything for the mafia if there's another good target. | ||
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 16 2013 07:51 Balla24 wrote: I would really prefer voting someone else than Vonthin and July. I don't see them as mafia yet, and can't really understand why you guys think they are mafia so definitively. I would much rather vote nyx, as his reasonings for his plays aren't anywhere to be found. It's just random posting and blindly following other people. Then the reaction vote on Vonthin? How is that not super strange? Vonthin and July showed their opinion on the Odin gamestart talk, and immediately that puts them under suspicion? Why? It's not like their positions were super scum-like. Their contribution levels are similar to nyx's if not more. ##vote: nyxnyxnyx There are enough votes on nyx at the moment that we could possibly swap, given that at least I and SagaZ appear to be present and able to do so. I am not immovable and we do have a couple of hours. If SagaZ will be around I think you have an opportunity to make a case in defense of Vonthin and/or against nyxnyxnyx. Can you post in more detail? | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
On October 16 2013 08:17 Seuss wrote: Ah I see what you are saying. Sucks that you had to go this far to explain but I don't think they can really change anything about their play at this point to use this information.If July is mafia and Vonthin is not, it's to July's advantage to kill Vonthin over mitt. The town is already largely against mitt, so killing him doesn't really accomplish anything for the mafia if there's another good target. I think, however, that you are assuming that July would take the risk to change his position to lynch Vonthin (which hasn't been his position). If I were July as scum, I'm not sure that's a move I would make, especially since he hasn't made himself open for moves like that with his low post count. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 15 2013 11:27 Bereft wrote: ok i'm back. reading thru the thread, i'd like to caution people against jumping on the mitt vote. i think what we need to decide on is whether we want to (a) vote a useless townie who might be scum or (b) vote an active townie who we have a strong scum read on. the reason why i'd caution town to vote mitt is because before the game even started, i was doing some joke votes and istandwithmitt goes: if we had gotten our pm's at this point, i would have thought this was some miserable scum play. but role pm's hadn't even been sent out at that point! so in conclusion, just keep in mind his in-game posting seems much in line with his pre-game posting. i think worst case if by the end of d1 we don't see a strong scum case against anyone in particular, mitt is an easy candidate. however given that we have another 24 hours at this point, let's not get pigeon-holed on mitt as there may be stronger candidates out there. i for one would perhaps put Vonthin and GGTemplar in that list, depending on what kind of posts they make in the next 24 hours. not necessarily saying i think they're scum at the moment, but i would like to hear more from them. the reason i'm singling these 2 out atm is because GGTemplar randomly hones into a pretty mild exchange between Sagaz and mitt and starts postulating about in what scenarios Sagaz is mafia or mitt is mafia, but them both being mafia are mutually exclusive. this seems like either an attempt to appear helpful while not being helpful at all, or a misguided attempt to be helpful, as their exchange seemed pretty minor / un-noteworthy and he's not providing any real analysis but more like game theory. as for Vonthin, all he does is jump upon the RNG proposal with a massive amount of risk aversion. in this kind of situation, i'm inclined to find mafia to be more risk averse than a townie. as mafia, you'd like to avoid being in the hot seat at any cost possible, whereas as town, my general feeling is that i'm less afraid of being scrutinized because i have nothing to hide. Vonthin also seems to completely miss the fact that Odin isn't actually proposing an RNG, but implicitly proposing RNG as a means to an end -- as a tool to force people to do their best to wriggle out of the hot seat. I really liked this post, in particular your criticism of me, as about as pro town as it gets. Looking back on my analysis of SagaZ/istandwithmitt, it actually does appear like I'm grasping for something to contribute and so I fully understand your judgment of it as either being mafia or misguided town. I would obviously say it was the latter of these two possibilities, but I'm surprised that you're the first person to actually point this out (playerboy345 sort of prodded me for my reasons a little bit, but didn't fully flesh out his thoughts like you). Although I dislike your quick followup post throwing July617 into the batch of your highest scum reads with Vonthin and myself (mainly because it seemed like a pretty weak read after your explanation of why you think Vonthin and I are mafia), I am honestly reading you more town than OdinOfPergo because the information, reads, and reasoning behind your reads are much more clearly presented and concise. July617's post that led to your judgment was somewhat off as well, so I am not going to judge you too harshly regarding that, but you're the closest thing to confirmed town to me without actually being confirmed town at this point. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 15 2013 17:25 Seuss wrote: We don't actually need every last poster giving a full list of reads. In fact, it's a fairly decent way for mafia members to look productive without actually contributing anything useful. The thread is also drawing very quiet, which is good news for the mafia, so I'm going to incite some discussion. At this point I believe istandwithmitt is just an absolutely terrible player/communicator. He's confrontational, dogmatic, egotistical, and generally a pain in the butt, but he's drawn way, way more negative attention to himself than makes sense for mafia. Bereft is right that we should be focusing on finding other targets right now. To that end, I believe the two most likely mafia players are SagaZ and July617. I'll present each case in turn. + Show Spoiler [SagaZ] + While he was the first player to post following the start of the game, he's been a sparse participant since. His first post immediately drew suspicion for a number of reasons. 1. Despite its word count it's actually very light on content. 2. The actual suggestions contained within are highly questionable. Observe: On October 14 2013 11:26 SagaZ wrote: As a disclaimer early, I think we should all agree on something. We are all newbies here, so if you fuck up or say something dumb, don't play the "oh sorry, I am new I didn't know". [/color] [color=green]Seuss is our confirmed town, we should try to organize around him. For a day 1 lynch, I think lynching some1 innactive is the best way to go.[/color] Having innactive players around just give mafia the opportunity to sit back and do nothing while town runs around screaming at each other. So give information about yourself if you can, so that others will be able to read you easy. My stance this early is easy: I will vote for people that post nothing worthy or nothing at all, unless some1 slips. I am also more likely to vote for people that say suspicious stuff and then say "sorry I didn't know I am new" SagaZ spends both the first and last paragraphs primarily rambling about how people shouldn't play the newbie card. If all he really wanted to do was encourage newbies to post, as he later claimed, he could easily have done so with a far more positive tone. He doesn't sound like he's encouraging newbies as much as discouraging them. While he does make two seemingly reasonable suggestions, they are obvious and ultimately counter-productive. As the sole confirmed townie in the game, my lifespan is likely to be short. Rallying around me exclusively would simply set the town up for trouble upon my inevitable death. Similarly, lynching players who'll simply be modkilled does nothing for the town either. So SagaZ' first post discouraged activity and made no useful suggestions. That's enough to arouse suspicion, but not to conclude he is mafia. That brings us to his second post: On October 14 2013 20:11 SagaZ wrote: Of course I meant lurker lynch, afkers will get modkilled after all. If one guy is not saying anything in the thread or very little, but still turn out to vote for people without giving reasoning... that would be very scum telling to me. I guess it is fairly obvious to everyone, but pointing it out will make them talk whether they want it or not, and that gives information. I took the opportunity of the first post to basically say "game started, don't hide behind your inexperience and post". For town to win we need 2 thing: - Get everyone active - Organize around our confirmed towny Seuss @nyxnyxnyx: Care to explain why you trust Odin? Him being so hyper posty makes me nervous but he actually present points for us to discuss on, which creates discussion and is therefore good for town. It is weird to me at least that you come in, decide to side with odin even thought we have a confirmed townie. In this post he claims he meant "lurker" when he said "inactive". However, in his first post he clearly stated that his potential vote targets included those who posted "nothing at all". SagaZ is backpedaling here, and making it seem reasonable by repeating the reasoning that undermined his previous position. He also very carefully drops his excuse for the weird newbie-discouraging rambling at the end of an unrelated paragraph, burying it. "Getting everyone active" is an important step for towns looking to win, but SagaZ doesn't actually have any suggestions on how to do that, and doesn't participate enough himself. He again says everyone should organize around me, also without suggesting how or acknowledging the obvious flaw in the strategy (e.g. I'm a dead man walking). Finally, he ends the post promoting discord. While nyxnyxnyx' decision to trust Odin could have used some additional vetting, at that point Odin was at the nexus of a fairly chaotic argument, and rallying behind his "let's randomly pick someone and put them in the hotseat to get information flowing" idea would have killed a lot of the useless chatter while promoting helpful discussion. Questioning nyxnyxnyx at this point only served to perpetuate the pointless debate, and promote distrust. SagaZ third post was entirely inconsequential, and above analysis. His fourth post at least pretended to have substance: On October 15 2013 05:02 SagaZ wrote: First impressions: going into this I was feeling most uncomfortable with nyxnyxnyx, blindly following some1 sounds like a pretty bad idea for a town, and especially stating it in the thread sounds more to me like he was trying to get onto OdinOfPergo's good side. And the I read istandwithmitt's post and I'm like wtf. He voted for me at the beginning and I thought it was alright, aggressive play-style pointing fingers early to get some heat and get the discussion going, but then instead of making use of it he just go silent. And now this switcharoo vote with no explanation and abrasive behavior? There are a lot of words in this post, but it essentially says nothing. The entire latter half is a rehash of what everyone else had already said about istandwithmitt. The former half mostly repeats his previous misgivings about nyxnyxnyx' decision, adding an extra touch of distrust of both nyx and Odin. No progress towards anything happens over the course of these paragraphs. Finally, there's SagaZ latest post: On October 15 2013 05:20 SagaZ wrote: I'd like to hear what playerboy345 has to say to Istandwithmitt's accusations; just complete the weird triangle between them 2 and E00e. At this point debating with istandwithmitt was utterly pointless, whoever was doing it. I had said as much earlier. Promoting a useless discussion is never helpful to the town. It is for these reasons that I believe SagaZ has a very high probability of being mafia, and is worthy of a lynching. + Show Spoiler [July617] + July has posted 6 times since the game began (I'm excluding his edit explanation and apology), and he's made a solid point once. Look for yourself: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=430766&user=July617 The only useful contribution he's made was his response to Odin's confusing RNG plan. At the time Odin's confusing manner of communicating made it seem like the plan was to randomly select someone, lynch them, and call it a day. That ultimately wasn't what Odin was aiming for, but at the time it seemed that way and if July hadn't responded as he did someone else would have. Which brings us to his other 5 posts. They all say essentially the same thing, "I don't want to lynch anyone yet, let's wait and talk more." If everyone was jumping to conclusions in the first four hours istandwithmitt style that might have been fine, but with practically half our time spent he's still waiting for a sign from God (or is it the Godfather?). The only player who has contributed less is Balla24, who hasn't posted at all. Keeping his head this low, and trying to keep people deferring the lynching decision as long as possible, makes it a high probability that July617 is mafia. Until such time as either or both of these individuals has a convincing defense established, it's my preference that we lynch one of them over istandwithmitt, much as it pains me. While I respect and relate to your judgment of istandwithmitt, I think if there's ever a day where we can afford to lynch the weakest town instead of a mafia, it's day 1. If he's mafia at this point, then all is well. If he's town, then I think it's better we get rid of him now rather than let him end up in the final 3 and remain a target of suspicion - in addition to the possibility that his seemingly arbitrary reads could end up being the final deciding vote on who is mafia or not. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 15 2013 21:12 playerboy345 wrote: Okay so you think he is pro-town because a first post and because he agrees on something with you? I'm sorry, I don't agree with your read here. So instead of analysing this post word for word (I barely slept today and I don't want to delay this post too much as I want to put some content out there) I'll just ask you why you are so sure that either SagaZ OR istwithandmitt are scum (and why they can't be scum mates) Short answer, I'm not anymore. It was a poor attempt to contribute some analysis on my part. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
I still think istandwithmitt is the better lynch for today though as he is just going to be dead-weight unless he drastically changes his play. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 16 2013 00:43 nyxnyxnyx wrote: Because Odin probably knows how to play this game better than I do and he's voting for him right now. If you're town, please stop this line of reasoning. Think for yourself and give your own reasons for voting or reading the way you do. "X did it too" isn't justifiable town play. | ||
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
I just got home and I 100% agree with the Istand point. He votes for himself. He just doesn't even want to play this game. ##unvote I will re-read this thread from 14. Since I only really had a brief moment to scim it since I've been home. Alls I can point to at this point from my scim through is: I still don't like July. And sorry Seuss; I really don't like Nyx's post still. Although I think you mentioned this. I will pull quotes and piece together a case for my lynch vote. | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 16 2013 06:10 playerboy345 wrote: Okay, so there is a chance he is not a cop, but it still annoys the crap out of me, why would you EVER discuss anything related to cops on the beginning of day 1? It just doesn't make sense to me, if you need information about such stuff you should ask your coach. Perfectly reasonable, not at the start of day 1 though. And yes I jumped on him because I read it as soft-claiming cop, which is as you will most likely agree, retarded to do at day 1. Also even though it may not matter all that much in this game, you played mafia with me last game and should sort of know my playstyle, I wouldn't try to gain town cred by jumping on someone but I'd use other methods. Why do you feel the need to point this out? It might be just me but I feel like you are trying too hard to look towny. (It looks like a similair mistake I made in my first game where I was mafia.) I don't necessarily agree, yes mitt's way of playing is extremely ballsy/annoying/not pro-town but playing that way as a SK would be risky and I feel like a non-risky pretending to be pro-town way of playing is the way to go. I might be wrong ofcourse but I think he is more of an annoying troll then a SK. I truly have the feeling he will flip town, there is just way too many people bandwagoning on him because he is such an easy target. Just leave him be for today, maybe he'll get modkilled or killed by a vigi. is it possible to vote for a modkill? onlywonderboy, you better start posting if you don't want this ending for you the same way it did in your first game. You are low on content, again and it really doesn't help your case. -I honestly think he was just making a newb mistake and that he should have asked a coach or mod. You completely overreacted to nothing. -I don't see how you think he was soft-claiming cop at all. You soft-claim cop by going really hard on your mafia check or defending your town check really hard. Being that there was no Night0, cop would have no checks at this point and so there would be no reason to soft claim Day1. -I think it's pretty obvious why he's pointing it out here. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
SagaZ (0): playerboy345 (0): istandwithmitt (3): GGTeMpLaR, Vonthin (6): Bereft, playerboy345, Seuss, nyxnyxnyx, onlywonderboy, SagaZ nyxnyxnyx (3): Vonthin, E00e, Balla24 July617 (0): Not voting (1): OdinOfPergo Currently, Vonthin is set to be lynched. to deadline. Remember, voting is mandatory! If there are errors, please let us know. | ||
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
| ||
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
You complain about a lack of details. Yet you don't ask any questions. On October 15 2013 07:39 July617 wrote: Well here I am again, sorry I had a long sleep today, Odin I think your reads are good reads are strong, I can see why you pegged me as possible scum, I was just trying to talk and move things along but with that said yeah I should of added more onto my post's and contributed/clarified/spoke-up with ideas of my own. My own personal reads ? I don't really have confidence in anyone as of yet, I mean I know a good chunk of us are town but none of the post's here give much info (Besides mitt and playerboy going at each other . which is weird ) like i said again in a previous post we should be talking more but like E00e said we'll have a hard time finding mafia without actual evidence to back it up . So i've really got nothing so far. I'm just trying to read everyone safely and calmly. On October 15 2013 18:11 July617 wrote: @seuss I'll give you that , my past five posts over and over again have been the pretty much the same thing, only because I really don't have an idea of who I should focus my attention to. Yes istandwithmitt is an easy lynch because of how he's acting but I believe there are better lynches out there. As to who ? I'm not so sure, I wish i could say SagaZ but he could just be playing bad town . And Whether it is bad town play or he's secretly mafia, I can't lean to either side without an explanation from him . So you actually do think that wasting a vote on Istand is a worthless vote. You're pretty much admitting to just taking the easy vote? The Nyx statement at the end was just a very brief rehashing mixed with a "Oh look, I'm helping" Nyx's one liners are the same use of Instands at this point to me. The only thing he hasn't done is post anything but them. On October 16 2013 05:46 July617 wrote: U.S timezone's people, give me a break, this is day 1 here, day one and we've had four players being called for a lynch and a mighty big bandwagon going on with mitt nyx and vothin, with the exception of vothin right now, yes nyx and mitt do seem like viable choices, but are your reads really that sure that they're mafia? We could be lynching bad town and losing votes we may need later on down the road, I'd like to not have a reason to vote for mitt, but the way he's acting will only worsen with time. I'd like to believe that it will worsen with time but I really don't know, and I have to go with the fact's here and the fact's are that we need the town as strong and as trusted as can be if we're going to want to win, having bad and erratic play isn't helping us . That's my opinion on the matter. ##Vote istandwithmitt Nyx dont pressure vote, pressure voting is how mafia infiltrates peoples ranks, just explain yourself more, and be exact and absolute with your points. Everything short of reading what you seriously already posted? Did you read the two and a half pages before it? "Oh his post are worse than mine" If this is true why are you still around? Why is Nyx getting the nice crumble of a supposed tip? Why do you choose mitt over Vontin? Are you trying to pull the weight off your scum buddy? I don't like this. Vonthin is a strong lynch for the town right now. You could of gone from one no poster to another. I only remember a few post that got brought up. ##vote July617 On October 16 2013 07:14 July617 wrote: Seus, I have nothing left to give you, Im bashing my head on the desk trying to figure out what I can do to make you see that I am town . I explained my vote on mitt and yet you still seem to believe i'm mafia, even going as far as saying you'd bet your "virtual life" on it . I don't know what to say, I've tried explaining myself but you just continue to call it useless and meaningless, if that's how you see it then so be it . I have nothing else to say to you because It seems like your stuck on this tirade of me being mafia, you asked me for my opinion and i gave it to you . Yeah I jumped on the bandwagon, because at this point mitt is no use to us as a town player, he continues to write even less then myself and he doesn't seem to care anymore, why are we keeping him around then? You're saying he's contributed more than me ? I'm doing what you asked me to do in your previous post, I gave my opinion and now i'm getting attacked again by you for the one thing you wanted me to do . | ||
| ||