tbh Geript owned up to his mistake and people have done way worse and have gotten no bans, so I think that his suggested punishment should be the accepted one.

Plus Meapak suggested 1 game as well. No real reason to extend it further.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

October 08 2013 19:52 GMT

#88

If such a thing occurred, I may or may not have been in the throes of a really horrible night at work.

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

October 08 2013 19:56 GMT

#89

Meapak asked for 1 game, so 1 game seems fine. FWIW I don't think geript or VE's modkills were in any way "strategic". Intentional, yes, but not "strategic" unless you consider getting killed for no reason to be a strategy.

WaveofShadow

Canada31495 Posts

October 08 2013 19:59 GMT

#90

On October 09 2013 04:56 Blazinghand wrote:
Meapak asked for 1 game, so 1 game seems fine. FWIW I don't think geript or VE's modkills were in any way "strategic". Intentional, yes, but not "strategic" unless you consider getting killed for no reason to be a strategy.

Yeah I'm not so sure they were strategic....it's not like they thought their deaths would really help the situation town had gotten themselves into.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 08 2013 20:00 GMT

#91

"Make them pity us!"

Best strategy

WaveofShadow

Canada31495 Posts

October 08 2013 20:01 GMT

#92

On October 09 2013 04:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Whether I'm guilty of the charges against me or not, I would never intentionally ruin a game. Ever.

But see the problem here is you did intentionally kill yourself. It didn't necessarily ruin the game, but only because of the state the game was already in. You could argue it both ways----if the game wasn't already the way it was you WOULD be intentionally ruining it, but then again you probably wouldn't have intentionally done it if the game wasn't the way it was.

kitaman27

United States9245 Posts

October 08 2013 20:12 GMT

#93

On October 09 2013 04:56 Blazinghand wrote:
Intentional, yes, but not "strategic" unless you consider getting killed for no reason to be a strategy.

Strategically, a town player who knows they no chance of not getting lynched should always modkill themselves when the mafia kp is greater than one. XD

[UoN]Sentinel

United States11320 Posts

October 08 2013 21:06 GMT

#94

yay some drama

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

October 08 2013 21:18 GMT

#95

I could not ruin an already ruined game even if I wanted to. The bans proposed are purely in the name of upholding the illusion of order - a worthy cause that I willingly submit to.

Meapak_Ziphh

United States6789 Posts

October 08 2013 21:22 GMT

#96

I don't think either of them wanted to ruin the game. Neither of them are people who do that. Both have owned up in either this thread or via PMs. I feel a one game ban is reasonable to enforce the rule.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

October 08 2013 21:33 GMT

#97

Also I'd like to add that GMarshal is like totally handsome and, I hear, extremely sexually potent.

Koshi

Belgium38799 Posts

October 08 2013 21:35 GMT

#98

On October 09 2013 04:45 Koshi wrote:
rofl

GMarshal

United States22154 Posts

October 08 2013 22:03 GMT

#99

On October 08 2013 11:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
TL Noir bans

1 game for both geript visceraeyes, as geript stated, he got himself modkilled. VE did the same thing and also PM'd people his alignment.

Approved :D
geript is sitting out Hogwarts atm, he should PM me when its over so I can remove him
VE, remember to sit something out please ^_^