This whole thing is 10% of the mafia ban tread lol nerds
TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 127
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
This whole thing is 10% of the mafia ban tread lol nerds | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
PRINCIPLE YOU FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!111!12!2!2! references self being a grammar nazi in a way that highlights stupidity and hypocrisy yet finds it is inappropriate regardless | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On June 05 2015 12:49 sicklucker wrote: My warning for the onegu game was kind of iffy too. I didnt even know i got it. There was voting like every 12 hours because It was a mismash. And I couldnt vote for myself as town mayor or whatever but me and most poeple wanted it to be me so I Held my vote hoping to not vote my competitor and forgot to place a pointless one later. 7 people were modkilled that game like why did me and stutters only get warnings? This whole thing is 10% of the mafia ban tread lol nerds http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SuspiciouslySpecificDenial You see not with the eyes of CHUPAZI | ||
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On June 05 2015 13:43 wherebugsgo wrote: You expect something I cannot see I know not whence it comes | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On June 05 2015 12:42 sicklucker wrote: thats not fucking true lol. He used it as an excuse. If you get offended by a 1 line post why do you even log onto the internet. He should have conceded. If he didnt know that or whatever thats fine. His coach should have told him to concede. Rules are rules but players make the rules and spite lynching people should be a against the rules as well no | ||
cakepie
985 Posts
On June 05 2015 12:49 sicklucker wrote: This whole thing is 10% of the mafia ban tread Last I checked, 5~6 pages out of 126 is 4~5%. Stop misrepresenting the numbers already. On June 05 2015 12:42 sicklucker wrote: If you get offended by a 1 line post why do you even log onto the internet. You don't seem to understand that this isn't reddit or 4chan or some random shitty forum. TL has rules, TL mafia has rules, and specifically TL mafia newbie games have rules. Those rules exist for good reasons, but you clearly don't care. On June 05 2015 12:42 sicklucker wrote: spite lynching people Being the host, and having perfect information I can categorically state that the fake claim to drive votes onto you on D5 was not driven out of personal spite of any sort. Nor was it out of an intent to damage your self-imagined no-mislynch streak that you seem to care so much about. Just as there was no intent to be BM against you by intentionally prolonging the game. You happened to be the RB target the previous night, and last scum's last gambit was counterclaim being blocked for the mislynch into fast talking other newbies the next day for the second mislynch required. It's as simple as that. Cohosts, hosting advisor, and mafia coach can all attest to this. I think it speaks volumes that you seem to be very hasty to presume yourself to be the target of BM or spite or complaints, or some form of personal attack or other, even when it is not the case. Why such victim mentality? And as an aside, if you're not obsessed with that selective-memory no-mislynch statistic of yours, why did you keep bringing it up and making a big deal out of it in game? And why is it that as I am reviewing the game and preparing my postmortem, it looks suspiciously like you were at least considering getting strategically replaced or strategically modkilled to avoid being possibly lynched? In any case, there's nothing left to be said about sicklucker in the context of my game if all we're going to get is cycling through the same bunch of lame excuses and shifting blame elsewhere. If he'd shown some remorse and understood that what he did was impermissible under any circumstances, I might have been willing to reduce the requested punishment, but we're way past that point now. Unless something else new comes up, I think I'm done here. I've got other things to do, other people from the game are waiting on a postmortem as well as end of game flavor that I still owe them. If folks here want to go dredge up and discuss the older game by Onegu where the warning occurred, that's fine with me, but it is not for me to comment about that game. Ultimately I believe the writing is already on the wall. Since sicklucker obviously doesn't get the message that we are trying to convey through words, we'll just have to convey it through strong action. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On June 05 2015 06:31 Sn0_Man wrote: Man I was expecting some rayn shenanigans when this thread sprouted this many unread posts this fast. Yeah I can't tell if this banlist drama is better or worse than the usual because of how relatively tame it is. Also did anyone else see this in the Blogs section and think.... http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/486876-artanis-drawing | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 05 2015 12:42 sicklucker wrote: thats not fucking true lol. He used it as an excuse. If you get offended by a 1 line post why do you even log onto the internet. He should have conceded. If he didnt know that or whatever thats fine. His coach should have told him to concede. Rules are rules but players make the rules and spite lynching people should be a against the rules as well Because I was his coach, I'm going to respond to this specifically. 1. This was a newbie game. Part of the purpose of the game is learning. I recommended against conceding because it's a major learning experience. Sure, boxerfred didn't ask if he should claim anything; he didn't ask specific questions on how he could have played things out. He didn't do a lot of things; but as a newbie game he deserves the ability to gain from experienced opinions on his actions or on what actions to take in the future or what not. Just conceding doesn't help. 2. There's no impetus for mafia to concede in situations that look dire. There's almost always a chance. If he wants to take that chance, then that's his choice. 3. You're not realizing the fact that it's completely possible for boxerfred to be town. It's not unheard of for newbies to do stupid things because they felt it was the right play. Maybe he CC'd you because he thought it was required to lynch mafia!SL. What you did, basically confirms you as town. That's a huge issue. | ||
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
FWIW, I think 2 games is plenty. I don't think it was maliciously trying to ruin the game or anything, and no history of rulebreaking. Yea, I saw the warning, but a warning for failing to vote doesn't feel very relevant. My only reservation is that SL doesn't seem to realize (or care?) that what he did was wrong and is trying to justify it. | ||
justanothertownie
16309 Posts
On June 06 2015 23:37 Keirathi wrote: Woo, banlist drama! FWIW, I think 2 games is plenty. I don't think it was maliciously trying to ruin the game or anything, and no history of rulebreaking. Yea, I saw the warning, but a warning for failing to vote doesn't feel very relevant. My only reservation is that SL doesn't seem to realize (or care?) that what he did was wrong and is trying to justify it. Incorrect. The guy has been modkilled before. Not that it matters really. | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
I have no necessary banlist actions. The replacements for the game were for legitimate causes and none of my warnings issued warrant any further action. | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
I had no part of this ban list interaction, for once | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Standard Inactivity Ban for Stutters695 for failure to vote, failure to cast witchcraft votes, and general inactivity, forcing a modkill. I PMed him numerous times and never got responses. I even asked for /confirms pregame and he /confirmed. Really bad form mate. Also, since he has a Warning, this will end up as a 2-game ban. Warning for WBG for behavior. | ||
| ||