EPT@JAT in my night post that's the only person I mention, as that is the other possibility.
Newbie Mini Mafia XLVI - Page 56
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
@JAT in my night post that's the only person I mention, as that is the other possibility. | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:33 Holyflare wrote: Slam was agreeing with iv all day 1 and calling him town, if he switched off of iv and eventually revealed scum it would be obvious implications for iv. Hence all are accusations have been wasted calling iv scum with slam when really we should be looking elsewhere. That is absolutely not true. Before slam voted iV he stated iV would be the best lynch in his eyes. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:34 OmniEulogy wrote: So you are saying he fell apart and posted three more pages of filter that look pretty much as useful as every other page? keep beating that dead horse Holy, see how far it'll take you. @JAT in my night post that's the only person I mention, as that is the other possibility. His posts before what I said were a lot more useful and did not implicate him as much as after my post. Stop being a tool you haven't even read them. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:35 justanothertownie wrote: That is absolutely not true. Before slam voted iV he stated iV would be the best lynch in his eyes. Look at how quickly he switched position from pro town iv to scum iv and then off that notion. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:36 Holyflare wrote: His posts before what I said were a lot more useful and did not implicate him as much as after my post. Stop being a tool you haven't even read them. so the case that you made about his posts being useless was wrong and you are saying his posts were now useful? | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:40 OmniEulogy wrote: so the case that you made about his posts being useless was wrong and you are saying his posts were now useful? I wasn't even sure on slam at that point but he was on the xzavier lynch and so was deus so I only made cases on those two. His defence was awful and like I said he fell apart. I made a case out of nothing and if you say it isn't even a good case then that's because his posts weren't implicating enough for you either. However, his stance afterwards completely changed my mind and after seeing deus' defences, like I said, it's an easy switch. | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:37 Holyflare wrote: Look at how quickly he switched position from pro town iv to scum iv and then off that notion. Yep. But why? My take as I mentioned earlier: He said iV was the best lynch for later towncred in case one of them would be lynched one day. Then Lone and me suddenly voted iV and he was FORCED to vote him too. Otherwise he would basically claim scum. All that is fine. But why would he take his vote off iV if iV is town? He tried to prevent this lynch with all his might looking very suspicious in the process. No reason to do that if iV is not scum. Something nice in this regard: On August 20 2013 09:45 iVLosK! wrote: Deus's behavior just prior to the D1 lynch has far more town motivation than scum. I can be a little clearer on this because I actually know my alignment but what scum motivation is there to last-minute save the "bully" town and kill the silent modkill? In my experience, bully town is scary town to noob scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:43 OmniEulogy wrote: Squibbles was just an AFK townie who didn't feel like playing anymore, he was the lurker who had 2 posts which even I said would have been a better person to lynch than Xzavier, not voting for him and then voting on LosK doesnt make Squibbles scum. Saying that also makes Deus scum because he didn't vote for Squibbles but instead went straight to LosK, and then to Xzavier. Good logic. I told you deus tunnels. He tunneled lurkers, of course his vote would be on a lurker if he wasn't convinced that iv was scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
Holy you are the weakest link! Goodbye. but seriously I'm gonna make dinner. I'll be back later. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6592 Posts
On August 22 2013 06:11 Holyflare wrote: The only people to have played with him last game were slam and me (and reps.........) and slam was scum so I don't know where the shit you get your information from. where... where where where do I get this idea from... man... oh wait, this is from what Deus said earlier, while referring to people talking about how he's not as aggressive this game. "Quickly, last thing, why the hell are people looking at my meta and saying, "oh he is not as aggressive as last game, that's scummy". We had a discussion on meta during policy chat and came to the conclusion that is not very useful in newb games." I could quote the multiple times people accused him of not being as aggressive but I figure the person himself owning up to the fact that he isn't should work just as well. That's the shit I got it from! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
| ||
