Making an alternate argument to your deus and ivlosk tunneling is also a form of playing devils advocate so no, maybe you should fucking google before insinuating that I don't know how to speak my own language. Just because I quote a post where you say do that for peoples TOWN MOTIVES does not mean I can't do it for peoples scum motives. It is the opposite to what you said to do.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 19:58 GMT

#1083

You also shouldn't have a problem with me tunneling you if you are town, I wouldn't find anything to question you about and you would be clean from everyones suspicions. So why the hate? Is it because you ARE actually scum?

OmniEulogy

Canada6592 Posts

August 21 2013 20:03 GMT

#1084

Thats not playing devils advocate Holy.... if all you can do is argue semantics and then get upset about it though be my guest, keep making no point and being wrong. I'm defending myself from your terrible tunneling, I don't have an issue with it but it's still annoying when you have literally 0 points other than "Slam didn't like to talk about Omni" I've disproved that already, He didn't talk about a lot of people. thanks for being a broken record though. That picture you posted about LosK applies to yourself as well it seems. Get off my back monkey, you're annoying but that's just about all.

When you're case turns into "Why are you defending yourself! Is it because You ARE scum!!!" you know you've made a wrong turn somewhere.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:05 GMT

#1085

The thing is you aren't defending yourself, I didn't say slam DIDN'T reference you, I'm saying he actively deflected from you. Of course if you were scum you would be trying to discredit everything I say anyway so what is the point of even discussing anything with you in the first place?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:09 GMT

#1086

+ Show Spoiler +

On August 22 2013 03:21 OmniEulogy wrote:

Show nested quote +

there's a big difference between you making your defense while I was voting on you, then JAT making his case, followed up by my analyzing of Deus's posts and Deus continuing to act like scum, trying to blame everybody else, and then you making .......... oh wait you didn't make a case on slam..... what are you talking about? The case you made on Deus after JAT and I had already covered everything and then your jump onto Slam with no reasoning behind it?

Wait hold on... where is this case on Slam or even mention of him that you are talking about... You were on the Deus wagon the entire time up to the lynch and then the only thing you say is

Show nested quote +

you were actually literally attacking Deus the post before that while still on his lynch wagon. You made one mention of maybe lynching Slam because Deus was trying to defend himself and that's it. one sentence. Was that your case?

In response to that crapy deflection you are trying to do. Deus actively defended himself for over an hour+, Slam cracked after the first case I made for him, it was an obvious switch to make.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:10 GMT

#1087

He also tunneled people the last game I played with him and he's doing the same thing in this game now. There is no where his scum buddy would let him tunnel JAT so aggressively all day.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:10 GMT

#1088

EBWOP: way

Corazon

United States3230 Posts

August 21 2013 20:15 GMT

#1089

On August 22 2013 04:55 justanothertownie wrote:

Show nested quote +

That's not always the case. I don't think we have a jailkeeper but to be sure:

Is the nightkill blockable by a jailkeeper?

Yes. If the scum member carrying out the kill is roleblocked (which is what jailkeeper does), the KP does not go through.

justanothertownie

16318 Posts

August 21 2013 20:16 GMT

#1090

Ok, thank you.

OmniEulogy

Canada6592 Posts

August 21 2013 20:18 GMT

#1091

He actively deflected FROM me too, it's how he was playing, I've addressed that already. You just aren't reading and computing it. Or you are just ignoring it and continuing to tunnel deeper, making you useless to us D3 if you are town. Although with your "placeholder" vote on Xzavier and your "hey look I made a case on slam 36 hours ago, and even though he had three pages of filter after I totally shut him up!" I don't even know what to call it... you weren't exactly the most helpful town player we had in the first place. I think this case on me is actually the first time you've tried to pressure somebody with a read, it only took you nearly seven days!

##Vote: DeusXmachina

I'm still going to vote for my scum read, who happened to try to make Slam seem town till the very end, and who Slam jumped off of and then tried to get Lone lynched instead of Deus.

justanothertownie

16318 Posts

August 21 2013 20:20 GMT

#1092

Hm, ok. I know this is getting old but why should Deus and slam as a scumteam do this vote bullshit Day1? Still a mystery to me.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:21 GMT

#1093

I just said he actively deflected from you...?

Have you read those 3 pages? Obviously not. Do you remember why the case was 36 hours ago and I bring it up again? Obviously not.

SLAM WAS AWAY FOR HALF OF DAY 2. HIS "3 pages of filter afterwards" are all saying: "holys case sums me up", "i am annoyed now" "i believe losk unvote deus vote lone"

if are seriously using that as an excuse then just lol

OmniEulogy

Canada6592 Posts

August 21 2013 20:28 GMT

#1094

So... because Slam said he had to leave and couldn't play for that day you take credit for.... taking his computer away then? Are you using his inability to post as your reason??? just lol is right.

Anyway JAT who in their right mind would vote on Xzavier D1 in the first place? This is the type of shit that is 1 scum did it, especially in the way Slam did it, there is probably another one on Xzavier. Slam had no reason to last minute jump onto Xzavier if he wasn't following some sort of weird plan imo.

OmniEulogy

Canada6592 Posts

August 21 2013 20:28 GMT

#1095

EBWOP: is = if

justanothertownie

16318 Posts

August 21 2013 20:31 GMT

#1096

On August 22 2013 05:28 OmniEulogy wrote:
So... because Slam said he had to leave and couldn't play for that day you take credit for.... taking his computer away then? Are you using his inability to post as your reason??? just lol is right.

Anyway JAT who in their right mind would vote on Xzavier D1 in the first place? This is the type of shit that is 1 scum did it, especially in the way Slam did it, there is probably another one on Xzavier. Slam had no reason to last minute jump onto Xzavier if he wasn't following some sort of weird plan imo.

Exactly. But the only real plan I can see there is saving iV.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:32 GMT

#1097

Are you just intentionally playing dumb?!?!?!?!?!? You said my case was 36 hours ago and I'm saying it doesn't matter because slam only came back within 24 hours and THEN WHEN HE READ IT HE FELL APART... what are you not understanding here?

Like what the actual shit. I am taking credit for revealing slam as the scum and not deus and actively trying to vote him off after I liked deus' defending.

justanothertownie

16318 Posts

August 21 2013 20:33 GMT

#1098

And even if slam had other reasons (or maybe no reason) for it - why should scum Deus do the same? Why would they draw this much attention to themselves needlessly?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:33 GMT

#1099

On August 22 2013 05:31 justanothertownie wrote:

Show nested quote +

Exactly. But the only real plan I can see there is saving iV.

Slam was agreeing with iv all day 1 and calling him town, if he switched off of iv and eventually revealed scum it would be obvious implications for iv. Hence all are accusations have been wasted calling iv scum with slam when really we should be looking elsewhere.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

August 21 2013 20:34 GMT

#1100

our*