EPT##vote: no-lynch
Newbie Mafia XL - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
##vote: no-lynch | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
 | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
##vote: JarJarDrinks | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
These are the reasons I came up with - based on the assumption that Rain is in fact vigi: A) Scum actually believed Rainbows would shot me and therefore chose to not RB and not kill. IF Rain turned around and shot someone else he would still not be confirmed as vigilant (with only one kill during the night). The problem with this reasoning is that, yes, had Rainbow shot someone last night (TRN) they, scum that is, could've killed off Rain and we wouldn't have a confirmed townie anyway. Then again if they DID believe that he would shot me they would have a 3v3 situation after two town kills last night. None of these makes much sense. B) Scum afk:ed through the night. Hm? C) We have a roleblocker and successfully roleblocked scum (good job if that's the case). Or scum killed scum: Killing TRN would make it seem like Rain got his "shot" off. It would be hard for him (based on the assumption that Rain is scum) to provide good reasons to be alive today otherwise if he still had his "shot". No competent scum team would keep a vigi alive that late into the game, would they? Well, if this is the case they (TRN/Rain) tricked me pretty badly. Should probably take a closer look at the last lynch, who switched at what time etc. Anyway we are either dealing with a fairly incompetent scum team or with a very competent one (Rain/Raven + someone). | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
On April 16 2013 10:11 Moloch wrote: So, Smancer is definitely town. He was pushing for JJD yesterday. Warent is town, as both JJD and TRN committed to lynching him (and almost succeeded). Rainbows is town unless he's lying about vigi and decided to make the game harder for himself than needed by killing scum and *insert crazy conspiracy theory here* /crazy. That leaves NW and Fishgle. NW jumped off the Warent lynch while there was only Rainbows and JJD voting for him. He could have easily stayed and waited for TRN to switch without arousing too much suspicion, so I'm pretty sure NW is town. The general impression I get from Fishgle is jumping on the anti-JJD bandwagon to built trust while trying to steer blame towards Warent. He hasn't done anything that makes him look innocent like everyone else has. Go go gadget lynch Fishgle? Even I am having trouble to come up with more crazy conspiracies against Rain. I'll have to agree that Fishgle is best lynch candidate for tomorrow. | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
On April 16 2013 05:01 Smancer wrote: @Warrent. I don't understand A. Not to mention that we don't actually know for sure if Mafia has a rollblocker. I think what you are saying is that Mafia thought Rainbows was gonig to kill a townie. So if two townies died last night (Warrent + Somone_else) then it would in fact confirm Rainbows claim. So If just one townie dies, we still aren't sure there is a vig? C might make sense, but you are basing these cases on the assumption that Rain is Vigi. That would mean 4 Power roles on the town side. Yeah, exactly with two kills townie+townie or townie+bad guy the claim would be confirmed. Period. But this way they leave some doubt, but it would have been much better for them to just RB and kill him. OR let him shot and kill him. Well, maybe 4 power roles vs 2 makes sense..? | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
I'll have to agree with Hapahauli, at least for me, the initial trolling just looked like its purpose was confusion. | ||
| ||
