Newbie Mafia XL - Page 28

On April 09 2013 05:42 Obzy wrote:


He ragequit, which I think is a townie move because I've done it before, his claim makes no fucking sense from any standpoint so it was probably a dumb townie move, he was the primary person being talked about and I am the only one (or it fucking feels like it at least) who has been adamantly defending him and I'm town so where are his scumbuddies. He did claim vigilante (Sorry, not ignoring it) which is a risky play and stupid under the circumstances if he were scum to claim instead of just calmly deflecting pressure, he's actually playing the game again which at least makes me breathe a small sigh of fucking relief;

I want to follow somebody, not lead myself, and Rainbows (at the beginning, anyways) did an admirable job of attempting to lead, as insane as it may have been, and [got distracted, forgot what I was gonna put here, then noticed JarJar posted. Thank god for that, I'm gonna read what he posted! Fuck these thoughts.]

On April 09 2013 05:50 Obzy wrote:
If you have the time, could you give your thoughts on recent interactions, specifically if you have any insights regarding Ravens and/or Warent?

On April 09 2013 05:58 Obzy wrote:
Ravens, he would've had to come back anyways (town or scum). I was told that getting emotional was not necessarily a towntell in XXX because it can be easily faked, it's merely one bullet point to me specifically. Why does he have no scumbuddies, why did he make himself the center of attention due to his antics, and why hasn't anybody else stepped up to lead if they don't want him to?

And what do you make of the fact that JarJar also has a town read on him? Specifically, does it make you more inclined to believe that Rainbows is town.

On April 09 2013 06:02 Rainbows wrote:
Nice lie Raven. Saying I think Jar jar is town.

On April 09 2013 05:55 Obzy wrote:
Hi Smancer, could you give me your thoughts on Ravens and Warent? Also, if you have anything to say about JarJar's case against kirby, whether agreement or against - and if against, why?

On April 09 2013 06:06 Obzy wrote:
By that logic, if five other people said yes, you'd agree that he was town? This is obviously at odds with feelings you expressed earlier, so I assume not. I was more curious to see how you would react to JarJar using similar logic that you seem to want to ignore, rather than just the fact that he has given out a townread on him.

Also, the fact that he has only myself and Rainbows as townreads - So? I only have Rain and Fish as townreads in my more recent post, and Fish hasn't shown up in awhile. Are you implying that you don't have me as a townread? (In which case cool, whatever) but I fail to see how the fact that he only has us as townreads as a relevant point unless you are trying to undermine the credibility of a townread on Rainbows.

On April 09 2013 06:06 Rainbows wrote:
That was actually my bad. Thought that meant me.