Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 1

On April 02 2013 07:16 VisceraEyes wrote:
Pretty sure D1 is instant majority too, but we only have 48hrs to decide on a lynch as opposed to the open-ended limit of subsequent days.

Lazer can I clarify a couple of things about your policy post?

1) 24 hours from when? Someone giving intent to hammer? I'm not sure what this limit is designed to accomplish, given your second point.
2) This is basically stating the obvious. Are you going to find anyone who hammers instantly scummy?

On April 02 2013 10:44 risk.nuke wrote:

Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument?

On April 02 2013 09:50 risk.nuke wrote:

No I don't.

On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.

On April 02 2013 22:32 Lazermonkey wrote:
I'd actually not talk about my (potential)scum read just yet. I want a certain interaction to be happening first. Most probebly, that will occour later today.

On April 03 2013 00:18 Ghor wrote:
Ghor not understand why people ask questions about risk, people not read properly ghor posts?read thread then come back with good question please.

only update is ghor not think RoL that scummy any more, but not like initial play. now better.

risk talk about fluff after he say he not like doing content of his fluff (policy).
his defense, bad, he contradict.

On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hopeless...



At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post?

On April 03 2013 01:38 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


It's that type of post I hate, Hopeless. I call it a Clarity. Clarity_nl did that in a game as scum, it was like he was bolstering a case without actually committing. I think that's what you were doing, prodding people to vote with no committal. And look, you can back out of it easy :D

How do the intentions behind voting sylencia not match with a scumread on risk.nuke? Both of them could be scum, according to him?

On April 03 2013 01:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself?

On April 03 2013 01:56 Ghor wrote:
ghor think hopeless braindead if he thinks ghor teammate with risk. ghor pointed out fallacies with risk early, try get proper opinion on him from sylencia.

All reasoning laid out, hopeless not absorb it.

Hopeless, question:
Ghor saw the scumslip you pointed out that was none.Ghor answered to your assessment, what do you deduce from it?

(Ghor deduces it another example of hopeless amazing reading comprehension)

On April 03 2013 02:15 Ghor wrote:


Hopeless can answer question. Why he think ghor scum for pointing out hopeless wrong argument against nuke?

On April 03 2013 02:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
And what do you think of me for also not agreeing with your assessment of the "scumslip" Hopeless? Because I think it's bogus too. Am I scum just trying "to sweep it under the rug"?

On April 03 2013 02:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
You heard it here first people...risk.nuke/Ghor/VE scumteam in 9 player game.

God can you imagine how fucked you guys would be? LYLO D2 LMAO

On April 03 2013 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else.

Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe.





When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy.

On April 03 2013 06:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hopeless who even said anything about you saving Sylencia? What are you talking about?

On April 03 2013 18:18 Lazermonkey wrote:
Also, don't hammer yet...

On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

On April 03 2013 22:09 AxleGreaser wrote:


How did your case on Ghor get started?

On April 03 2013 22:24 Lazermonkey wrote:
So you confess that you are looking scummy or what?

On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.

On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

On April 02 2013 10:46 risk.nuke wrote:

Will you please god damn stop tunneling? The thread have talked about it, I assume you read the thread?

On April 02 2013 20:58 risk.nuke wrote:
Hopeless1der
it started with this post.

He's pretty much around but doesn't do anything or comments on anything of worth. His three posts tells us he was around and this is what he choose to comment on?
Compare to other filters,
dessert
fruity

His other two posts one is a sheep-post where he talks briefly about hammers, which is fine but it doesn't really add anything.
The second and last one is some cheap shots which mostly just serve to tell us he's not reading the thread and if he is he's just skimming through it without caring when we're 1½ pages.

On April 03 2013 14:27 risk.nuke wrote:
We're not lynching anyone other then hopeless. RoL you got to be joking if you think that we're going to lynch cheesecake first. While I agree with your posts and I had some thoughts in simmilar direction last night. It's still a weaker case then on hopeless. I don't like how you haven't talked about me since your vote and I would like you to comment further on me and hopeless.

Hopeless is obvious scum and has pretty much given up by now. This is not how he plays as town.

And Ghor's post are not hard to read. If you disregard the fact that he speaks in third person and often don't use capital letters they're actually very simple to read and even efficiently phrased.

Sylencia. Who do you want to kill?

On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.

On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

On April 02 2013 10:46 risk.nuke wrote:

Will you please god damn stop tunneling? The thread have talked about it, I assume you read the thread?

On April 02 2013 20:58 risk.nuke wrote:
Hopeless1der
it started with this post.

He's pretty much around but doesn't do anything or comments on anything of worth. His three posts tells us he was around and this is what he choose to comment on?
Compare to other filters,
dessert
fruity

His other two posts one is a sheep-post where he talks briefly about hammers, which is fine but it doesn't really add anything.
The second and last one is some cheap shots which mostly just serve to tell us he's not reading the thread and if he is he's just skimming through it without caring when we're 1½ pages.

On April 03 2013 14:27 risk.nuke wrote:
We're not lynching anyone other then hopeless. RoL you got to be joking if you think that we're going to lynch cheesecake first. While I agree with your posts and I had some thoughts in simmilar direction last night. It's still a weaker case then on hopeless. I don't like how you haven't talked about me since your vote and I would like you to comment further on me and hopeless.

Hopeless is obvious scum and has pretty much given up by now. This is not how he plays as town.

And Ghor's post are not hard to read. If you disregard the fact that he speaks in third person and often don't use capital letters they're actually very simple to read and even efficiently phrased.

Sylencia. Who do you want to kill?

On April 03 2013 22:34 Lazermonkey wrote:
Yes, I was just slightly suprised to see you defend yourself in that matter...

On April 03 2013 22:36 AxleGreaser wrote:


That's strange... while that is where in your filter you first started mentioning Ghor...
I did indeed find the argument over the scum slip interesting.
In this post


You indicate that it was him not agreeing with your assessment of the scumslip.

Now that is important to me in assessing the genuine nature of your scum hunting.
it strike me that if you are reacting emotively to "a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills"
and when you find out that what you claimed was what originally put you onto him
then at best you are seriously tunnel visioned...

Wine that is easier to drink is that, you are scum, and not interested in whether or not your read started from false premise. (the false premise is Ghor not liking your scum slip indicated to you, he was scum)

Its true that is not strong indicator, its true if I had better candidate id vote lynch them.
Its not the only thing I said in that post by rather long shot.

As you have noted its not possible that all the people who don't think that was scum slip are scum, there
are just too many of us.

So yes I regard that you do not seem to go back and actually critically evaluate your reads as scum indicative.
it simply doesn't feel like genuine searching for the truth, just a glove that does or does not fit.


BTW. I got a bad feeling the trolly jerk face probably fell off his chair when he read your last post.

On April 03 2013 07:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
Noted.

I'm rereading right now. I totally missed that Ghor had made a case on Sylencia. I'm gonna go read that part of the day in context and see what I see.

On April 04 2013 00:52 Ghor wrote:
Ghor very curious why hopeless never ask scummy sylencia why he want vote him. scummy sylencia only skating by hopeless lynch. and hopeless hardly mention sylencia or comment on what ghor said.look like not exist for each other in thread, maybe only in qt.

sylencia not ask scumread CC question.sylencia not ask hopeless question. sylencia fake scumhunt. no hunt for information. he only try discredit ghor cause ghor close scumteam.

Look in filter, what ghor say true. sylencia not interested in scumread, only passive say he lynch people. goes for ghor cause ghor look like troll, that initial reason. now only give other reason to stay on easy target. but ghor can stop troll if he want and sylencia very likely not stop tunnel. that cause sylencia scum.

On April 04 2013 01:19 Ghor wrote:
Hopeless say what you think of sylencia instead of derping? Your reading mistakes made you look terrible, but not only, and I'm trying to get a scummier dude than you lynched, so stop martyring and start cooperating if you're town.

On April 04 2013 01:34 risk.nuke wrote:
I've been the most active player in the thread and half of the game have revolved around me.

On April 04 2013 06:40 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I'm at work hiding my phone under the table... this is exciting! Is there no convincing you guys of a hopeless lynch instead?

On April 05 2013 04:17 Lazermonkey wrote:
Hopeless, why does any of the stuff you mention make risk scum? Do you actually think that it would've been better for us to have had a no lynch?

On April 05 2013 04:44 Lazermonkey wrote:
The alternative for him would be a No-lynch. I was on the verge of voting you at that time as no lynch is really fucking terrible, does it make me scum?

On April 03 2013 03:17 risk.nuke wrote:
I'm feeling confident hopeless is scum, I haven't gone over Sylencia yet.
I don't have time now but I'll get back to you on him later.

On April 03 2013 14:27 risk.nuke wrote:
We're not lynching anyone other then hopeless. RoL you got to be joking if you think that we're going to lynch cheesecake first. While I agree with your posts and I had some thoughts in simmilar direction last night. It's still a weaker case then on hopeless. I don't like how you haven't talked about me since your vote and I would like you to comment further on me and hopeless.

Hopeless is obvious scum and has pretty much given up by now. This is not how he plays as town.

And Ghor's post are not hard to read. If you disregard the fact that he speaks in third person and often don't use capital letters they're actually very simple to read and even efficiently phrased.

Sylencia. Who do you want to kill?

On April 04 2013 05:50 risk.nuke wrote:

lol... Where does it look like I stand?

On April 05 2013 04:55 Lazermonkey wrote:
What?! I was doing the EXACT same thing as risk was doing ( except the other way around). I pushed Sylencia the whole day, defended you and STILL was willing to vote you. So, please explain how Risks actions only makes him scum...

On April 05 2013 06:02 risk.nuke wrote:
Hopeless, I'm still waiting for you to explain to me in detail how you have a townread on ghor and a scumread on me.

On April 05 2013 23:59 Lazermonkey wrote:
He is making sense alot of sense. Ghor is trying to justify his lie by bringing up the most crazy fucking accusations I've seen in a while. What about you?

On April 07 2013 12:17 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Alright fuck this. We are killing VisceraEyes because I said so.
##vote: VisceraEyes

If cheesecake was scum this thread would not be dead and people would be talking. We are most likely barking up the wrong tree so fuck it. We are killing VisceraEyes because I said so and I don't feel like providing any other reasoning apart from saying that he is one of 3 people I am suspicious of.

DO IT UP

On April 09 2013 03:35 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Stupid logic to me. Anyway, I'd like to wrap this lynch up soon. If we have another "FUCK, LAST MINUTE HAMMER" situation things will not turn out well.

Hopeless, I said speak, not vote!

On April 10 2013 08:45 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
When have you ever expressed any thoughts of me being scum hopeless? What made you so sure now?

On April 07 2013 12:17 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Alright fuck this. We are killing VisceraEyes because I said so.
##vote: VisceraEyes

If cheesecake was scum this thread would not be dead and people would be talking. We are most likely barking up the wrong tree so fuck it. We are killing VisceraEyes because I said so and I don't feel like providing any other reasoning apart from saying that he is one of 3 people I am suspicious of.

DO IT UP