EPTI agree to all the rules and activity requirements in the OP
How will "night" actions be resolved (medic target and mafia KP)?
Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 1
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
I agree to all the rules and activity requirements in the OP How will "night" actions be resolved (medic target and mafia KP)? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 02 2013 07:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Pretty sure D1 is instant majority too, but we only have 48hrs to decide on a lynch as opposed to the open-ended limit of subsequent days. Lazer can I clarify a couple of things about your policy post? 1) 24 hours from when? Someone giving intent to hammer? I'm not sure what this limit is designed to accomplish, given your second point. 2) This is basically stating the obvious. Are you going to find anyone who hammers instantly scummy? @2-> Instant hammering, will result in the hammerer being hammered (with a hammer). + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://www.ssbwiki.com/images/thumb/f/fa/Hammer.jpg/250px-Hammer.jpg) In English this time: Don't instant-hammer, or I'll move to lynch you as punishment. Town needs the discussion and attempting to stop that is scummy. If you are that confident in a lynch target, then you should be able to contain your excitement for a couple hours. **The hammer itself is not scummy, its the way you choose to do it.** | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 02 2013 10:44 risk.nuke wrote: Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument? Doesn't seem all that legit to me. On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote: I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal. Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 02 2013 22:32 Lazermonkey wrote: I'd actually not talk about my (potential)scum read just yet. I want a certain interaction to be happening first. Most probebly, that will occour later today. Lazer, I don't suppose you could let us know who you're waiting for? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 00:18 Ghor wrote: Ghor not understand why people ask questions about risk, people not read properly ghor posts?read thread then come back with good question please. only update is ghor not think RoL that scummy any more, but not like initial play. now better. risk talk about fluff after he say he not like doing content of his fluff (policy). his defense, bad, he contradict. ##Vote: Ghor Do you think risk.nuke is scum? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hopeless... At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post? I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip. Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:38 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: It's that type of post I hate, Hopeless. I call it a Clarity. Clarity_nl did that in a game as scum, it was like he was bolstering a case without actually committing. I think that's what you were doing, prodding people to vote with no committal. And look, you can back out of it easy :D How do the intentions behind voting sylencia not match with a scumread on risk.nuke? Both of them could be scum, according to him? Yes, but by that logic any two players could be scum. ghor seemingly had a limited read on sylencia and was trying to develop one based on sylencia's response to risk's filter and the surrounding discussion. Sylencia "failed" whatever Ghor's criteria was, but during the whole process, ghor isn't really pushing risk nuke at all, he's needling away at sylencia, someone who maintains that he can see both sides of the coin and is hesitant to commit. Calling them both scum would involve tying the non-commital stance to a scum motive, something that ghor has neglected. Its a very straightforward thing to say, but he doesn't do it. I don't think he's legitimately trying to push for risk's lynch because I believe ghor and risk.nuke are the scum team. His pushing sylencia as risk`s teammate doesnt make sense because we should just lynch risk in that case, theres enough support for it. Why bother introducing a new candidate? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:46 VisceraEyes wrote: Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself? My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter. ##Unvote: Ghor ##Vote: risk.nuke | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 01:56 Ghor wrote: ghor think hopeless braindead if he thinks ghor teammate with risk. ghor pointed out fallacies with risk early, try get proper opinion on him from sylencia. All reasoning laid out, hopeless not absorb it. Hopeless, question: Ghor saw the scumslip you pointed out that was none.Ghor answered to your assessment, what do you deduce from it? (Ghor deduces it another example of hopeless amazing reading comprehension) it was what initially put me onto you as scum, so thank you for the compliment. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 02:15 Ghor wrote: Hopeless can answer question. Why he think ghor scum for pointing out hopeless wrong argument against nuke? To sweep it under the rug and prevent people from catching on to it. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 02:19 VisceraEyes wrote: And what do you think of me for also not agreeing with your assessment of the "scumslip" Hopeless? Because I think it's bogus too. Am I scum just trying "to sweep it under the rug"? Yes, you're scum too VE | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5823 Posts
On April 03 2013 02:23 VisceraEyes wrote: You heard it here first people...risk.nuke/Ghor/VE scumteam in 9 player game. God can you imagine how fucked you guys would be? LYLO D2 LMAO /sarcasm? | ||
| ||
