EPTOn April 23 2013 15:53 Bill Murray wrote:
so i'm actually not going to vote clarity... im going to vote sharrant
so i'm actually not going to vote clarity... im going to vote sharrant
I mean, you actually voted yamato in the voting thread, but okay.
TL Mafia LXI - Page 54
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I mean, you actually voted yamato in the voting thread, but okay. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 16:33 Clarity_nl wrote: Cause you're both anti town in the dumbest ways possible, but not convinced either of ye are scum just yet. You have a higher chance than most, though. There has also been 0 resistance to both your lynches Well Vivax did try and derail yamato's lynch with his case So resistance to yamato's lynch. Also technically your case on sharrent has also been resistance. Which means that resistance being a factor in someone being scum is bullshit. I wanna lynch you kinda clarity, you know why? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 23 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote: Well Vivax did try and derail yamato's lynch with his case So resistance to yamato's lynch. Also technically your case on sharrent has also been resistance. Which means that resistance being a factor in someone being scum is bullshit. I wanna lynch you kinda clarity, you know why? Yes good point, clearly I should look at myself when I say "there's been no resistance" Anyway, I'll indulge you, why? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 23 2013 15:53 Bill Murray wrote: Cheesecake and WavesofShadow (WoS) have both parroted me Cheesecake called Clarity's case tunnely/nitpicky... I literally used the word tunnely WoS comes in and uses the word reaching... and lo and behold... after I said tunnely... I said reaching Scum are piggybacking my wording to get a lynch imo lolwut. Just because I think Clarity's case is bad doesn't mean i think he's scum. And you think I'm scum now? Just when I thought you were starting to make sense. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 16:43 Clarity_nl wrote: Yes good point, clearly I should look at myself when I say "there's been no resistance" Anyway, I'll indulge you, why? Good, my plan is going welllllll But main points that have been already said. Case on totally random dude. Case is bad because, town give dudes easy outs all the time Town scattershot questions all the time too. Like non of this is really all that scummy, it seems to be playstyle more than alignment IMO. So, easy case to make, and it basically allows you to 'look' useful cause whos gonna call out clarity for a bad case? No one. (Of course you could do this as town too, and thats what I am currently trying to find out) Ignored main argument of yamato/oats until asked. Clarity, do you think your meta for scum or town play has changed significantly since the last game you played? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Lol now I know how DrH felt in British 2 when he was 1 vote from a stupid lynch. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:04 Oatsmaster wrote: Good, my plan is going welllllll But main points that have been already said. Case on totally random dude. Case is bad because, town give dudes easy outs all the time Town scattershot questions all the time too. Like non of this is really all that scummy, it seems to be playstyle more than alignment IMO. So, easy case to make, and it basically allows you to 'look' useful cause whos gonna call out clarity for a bad case? No one. (Of course you could do this as town too, and thats what I am currently trying to find out) Ignored main argument of yamato/oats until asked. Clarity, do you think your meta for scum or town play has changed significantly since the last game you played? Cause the last 10 pages were all yamato/oats and I had nothing to add, so I focused elsewhere. Doubt my meta has changed much since last I played, seeing as it was last I played. And clearly you're wrong about people not calling me out if I make a (subjectively) bad case. Why would you say that? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:20 Clarity_nl wrote: Cause the last 10 pages were all yamato/oats and I had nothing to add, so I focused elsewhere. Doubt my meta has changed much since last I played, seeing as it was last I played. And clearly you're wrong about people not calling me out if I make a (subjectively) bad case. Why would you say that? By call out, i meant, OH SHIT CLARITY SCUMMMMYYYYY. Which no one did. That case was really low impact, it came and went. What do you think about my response to your case? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:25 Oatsmaster wrote: By call out, i meant, OH SHIT CLARITY SCUMMMMYYYYY. Which no one did. That case was really low impact, it came and went. What do you think about my response to your case? *shrugs*, you just called my case weird cause it wasn't a trending topic. You didn't even mention anything regarding my alignment till after Wave's hard defense of him, why is that? Although I stand by most of my observations in my case, it shouldn't have been made a case yet, shoulda just put it in the notes till I had a little more. Guess I felt like contributing something fresh since I felt guilty for missing the start of the game. It was either post that or post nothing seeing as it was quite late. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:38 Clarity_nl wrote: *shrugs*, you just called my case weird cause it wasn't a trending topic. You didn't even mention anything regarding my alignment till after Wave's hard defense of him, why is that? Although I stand by most of my observations in my case, it shouldn't have been made a case yet, shoulda just put it in the notes till I had a little more. Guess I felt like contributing something fresh since I felt guilty for missing the start of the game. It was either post that or post nothing seeing as it was quite late. I mentioned you now because everyone stopped talking to me, and I wanna actually not be an idiot, and figure the game out. As in the part about it being playstyle indicative, rather than alignment indicative. Actually it doesnt matter, never mind. Do you wanna lynch sharrent today? Or any other scumreads? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Don't have many full fledged opinions yet, but the people I was gonna look into next (that being tonight, have work soon) were gonna be giygas, bc and shiaopi (mainly because I don't remember much of them from reading through the thread) | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:52 Clarity_nl wrote: I wouldn't lynch him right now, no. Would want to hear from him first. Don't have many full fledged opinions yet, but the people I was gonna look into next (that being tonight, have work soon) were gonna be giygas, bc and shiaopi (mainly because I don't remember much of them from reading through the thread) Yeah do that. Sounds like a good plan  | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 23 2013 17:52 Clarity_nl wrote: I wouldn't lynch him right now, no. Would want to hear from him first. Don't have many full fledged opinions yet, but the people I was gonna look into next (that being tonight, have work soon) were gonna be giygas, bc and shiaopi (mainly because I don't remember much of them from reading through the thread) sup scum | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Yeah...I was hesitant to call you scum until this....the reason you didn't remember much of them is because they haven't done very much at all, basically. Why not give us something actually contextually relevant? Why go after irrelevant reads right now? Fuck it I'm still hesitant, I'll still give you the benefit of the doubt. If you really think you can find something worthwhile on those 3, by all means, but you're taking the easy way out and it doesn't look good. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Fuck off guys I went to bed at 5 and woke up at 8, I got asked who else I'd like to lynch and my answer is, I dunno but I'm gonna look at these people next. Doesn't mean they're the only ones I'll look at if I find nothing it's just who I'm gonna look at next. | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
On April 23 2013 14:31 Oatsmaster wrote: Geript. Why do you think I 180ed then? Dont you think it wouldve been in my best interests as scum to try and get really spammy yamato lynched? What is the scum objective of me trying to get people to think of alternative targets rather than yamato? Explain this? I bully scum, means Im not scum? Or what? Scumslip? Or what? 1. I don't care about the 180; I care about voting for a townread On April 23 2013 09:32 Oatsmaster wrote:Yamato is really bleh, but I never played in a game with him as scum and this feels like Boardwalk lategame. and On April 23 2013 09:48 yamato77 wrote: Yeah, Oats' return is not impressive. On April 23 2013 09:53 Oatsmaster wrote: sorry for not writing a 5 page post THAT THIS DUDE IS SCUM. Can we lynch Ace? I would like to keep his streak of getting mislynched in like almost every game.(scumslip :o) However the fact that you seem to 180 in the direction of whoever you're talking to/about you 'change' your mind to match their viewpoint at the time is odd. Hell you don't even realize your vote is on Yamato an untenable position until I bring it up. That's pure survival mentality and obvious scum. You seemed more than willing to get yamato lynched when talking to VE but were willing to join yamato's wagon of justice on ace. The wagon on yamato looks like it had come and gone and you were next on the block. I think shifting people back to yamato would've been tougher than shifting them elsewhere. On April 23 2013 14:31 Oatsmaster wrote: Explain this? I bully scum, means Im not scum? Or what? Scumslip? Or what? At that time you were all down for a Scum VE lynch. At the time you were ALSO trying to shift VE's vote onto someone else. You can't tell me it's not weird as shit. Your actions tell me that you know that VE is town but that you aren't willing to say that. | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 23 2013 18:47 getmoript wrote: 1. I don't care about the 180; I care about voting for a townread and However the fact that you seem to 180 in the direction of whoever you're talking to/about you 'change' your mind to match their viewpoint at the time is odd. Hell you don't even realize your vote is on Yamato an untenable position until I bring it up. That's pure survival mentality and obvious scum. You seemed more than willing to get yamato lynched when talking to VE but were willing to join yamato's wagon of justice on ace. The wagon on yamato looks like it had come and gone and you were next on the block. I think shifting people back to yamato would've been tougher than shifting them elsewhere. At that time you were all down for a Scum VE lynch. At the time you were ALSO trying to shift VE's vote onto someone else. You can't tell me it's not weird as shit. Your actions tell me that you know that VE is town but that you aren't willing to say that. Right. Voting a town read. Except if he was a town read when I typed + Show Spoiler + ££vote yamato About VE. You are making a whole lotta assumptions there, I wanted VE to clarify his position as it was not really clear from his previous statement. You somehow made that into I wanted to bully my scum read into voting for someone I wanted to lynch. Right. I dont see the connection there. | ||
| ||
