EPTThe Game [N] - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
You don't think coag is scum based off of him posting a couple one-word posts in the first 12 hours of play. And even if you did, the way thepeashooter is going about supporting his case and posting smacks not of a town scumhunter trying to reel in his prey, but a scum player who's avoiding giving out meaningful reads. He doesn't want to pull back the curtain too much, he doesn't want us to see how he thinks. He knows serious engagement would betray his true colours: red | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:11 geript wrote: Fuck you too BH. please geript you're burying me in a mountain of helpfulness plz you are too helpful plz stop oh no wait that's the opposite | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
fuck off? | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:23 layabout wrote: goodkarma are you suspicious of VE or was the red text just there for kicks? also why do you feel the need to OMGUS Wiggles then try to deflect attention towards lurkers and those who are absent? I would say that my stance on VE has been that he was being silly. That coag attempted to go into the group though convinced me that I needed to be sure it didn't gain momentum as it was not a very pro-town plan. I'm not against "town circles," however, if they're done right. Just because I had issues with Wiggles and he accused me first doesn't make it an OMGUS. He is lurking the shit out of the thread now. The mentality being, "I presented my case, now I don't need to do shit." That is a scum mentality, not a town one. It shows disinterest in the thread. As for "deflecting to lurkers," I don't see what you mean. The game was SO early at that point.. I don't feel you could call anyone that didn't chime in yet lurkers. Anything else? I will be presenting my own case before the evening's done, so everyone has a solid 24ish hours to look at it. But I typically don't like to jump into cases as quickly as some here. Call that scummy if you want, but it's my playstyle. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:15 Kenpachi wrote: K BH. you know as well as i do that we dont deviate and form 2 wagons. fuck off? 1) My vote was down first 2) TPS is scum | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:16 Kenpachi wrote: Im inclined to call you scum also I don't care what you're inclined to call me, I care that you get inclined to vote thepeashooter. Read his filter and my case-- you haven't said anything about him yet. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:14 Wade Fell wrote: please geript you're burying me in a mountain of helpfulness plz you are too helpful plz stop oh no wait that's the opposite So do you have any thoughts on my case or are you just pulling a geript | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:21 Kenpachi wrote: Is he a smurf? TPS is almost certainly a smurf. | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
More reason, btw, why his so-called "case" on coag is bad. He should definitely know better. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:22 Wade Fell wrote: More reason, btw, why his so-called "case" on coag is bad. He should definitely know better. exactly what i was thinking but its a case of WIFOM here and i honestly cant tell. | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:24 Kenpachi wrote: exactly what i was thinking but its a case of WIFOM here and i honestly cant tell. There is a possibility he's a smurf of a younger player who hasn't heard of coag, or he literally made his account just before this game started, just to sign up for the last spot. I consider both of these possibilities somewhat unlikely. And, even considering the apparent vacuousness of his vote on coag, he hasn't taken a stance on GK or Geript or really anyone or anything, ignoring all other discussion in town to tunnel his target. This is an easy way for scum to avoid meaningful interaction with town and giving out reads. We don't know anything about his thought-process, so of course it seems WIFOM-ey-- but his play absolutely prevents us from clearing the wine from in front of us. I'm not saying he's a bad scum player-- this is a clever ruse. But he is scum. Town would have an opinion on GK, ESPECIALLY town pushing another lynch. Can this guy really be considered to be "pushing" coag given that he hasn't tried to stop the GK lynch at all? He's putting forth a simulacrum of what a townie does. Clever, but not enough. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
No questions that is done. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
idk you guys just shoot up whoever you want actually | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:05 cosmicomics wrote: Laying down votes is alignment null, and him actually trying to push a lynch or not doesn't matter. He misinterpreted geript as still doing his RNG stuff when it was clear he wasn't. How is misinterpreting, ie, being wrong, a scumtell? What's the implication there? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:15 goodkarma wrote: I would say that my stance on VE has been that he was being silly. That coag attempted to go into the group though convinced me that I needed to be sure it didn't gain momentum as it was not a very pro-town plan. I'm not against "town circles," however, if they're done right. Just because I had issues with Wiggles and he accused me first doesn't make it an OMGUS. He is lurking the shit out of the thread now. The mentality being, "I presented my case, now I don't need to do shit." That is a scum mentality, not a town one. It shows disinterest in the thread. As for "deflecting to lurkers," I don't see what you mean. The game was SO early at that point.. I don't feel you could call anyone that didn't chime in yet lurkers. Anything else? I will be presenting my own case before the evening's done, so everyone has a solid 24ish hours to look at it. But I typically don't like to jump into cases as quickly as some here. Call that scummy if you want, but it's my playstyle. "Wiggles is lurking and is scum"# "I am not deflecting attention towards lurkers" ...? Isn't that exactly what you are doing? your point about holding off early on is valid though. | ||
|
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 17 2013 09:35 Kenpachi wrote: ok your bandwagon is pretty legit. I'd call for a lynch on Peashooter or goodkarma and a vig shot the next night. No questions that is done. I think I see what you're getting at, but all ribbing and geript aside, I won't be drawing associative tells between unflipped players. | ||
| ||
