| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On March 07 2013 05:25 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I didn't read TTABE  So headline the next episode! You can do analysis of LX next if you feel there is something there, and then mebbe after that since NMM 38 is about to start there could be a newbie episode...? | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On March 07 2013 05:28 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I'd rather forget LX after it's over Well that's what I said earlier but.... In any case since you're one of the vets you can do the next one on some past epic game of your choice right? Or just general strats/tactics? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Pumped bros | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
I imagine the podcast would just be like being mafia in storm. It all starts out very well with plenty of game talk then dissolves into playing tribes and pointing out funny posts. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
all of my games are pretty much me getting very close to winning the game and then going down hard and failing miserably salem mafia - pinned the entire scumteam in 2 days but only after i had fed the entire list of blues to the godfather and was an hour away from getting hit insane mafia - pinned the entire scumteam 5 hours in but then was too scared to go after ace and ended up arguing with pandain for the rest of the thread before i died storm mafia - got played like a violin by wherebugsgo all my town games i get really close to finding scum, usually by day 2 or 3 I have two ideas of who scum are, split by association reads and end up going with the wrong one because i let myself get influenced and tilted easily im ok at looking at games in a vacuum though | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
like analyzing what's going on in the scum qt and how i feel about town/scum decisions, stuff like that hope it ends up a good game and not just me talking about how much everyone sucks | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 07 2013 05:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I could all of my games are pretty much me getting very close to winning the game and then going down hard and failing miserably salem mafia - pinned the entire scumteam in 2 days but only after i had fed the entire list of blues to the godfather and was an hour away from getting hit insane mafia - pinned the entire scumteam 5 hours in but then was too scared to go after ace and ended up arguing with pandain for the rest of the thread before i died storm mafia - got played like a violin by wherebugsgo all my town games i get really close to finding scum, usually by day 2 or 3 I have two ideas of who scum are, split by association reads and end up going with the wrong one because i let myself get influenced and tilted easily im ok at looking at games in a vacuum though If you want, after its over, we could get the guys from British ii to all do an analysis together. Since its a small game it would be easy for people to follow. And hopefully informative. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
The idea is that people will play more deliberately but it could very easily blow up in my face. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
I do want to hear about why mafia weren't more proactive with dueling people. Dieno's duel was a good one IMO if he had played it better. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
it would be the same as pressuring the person who hammers a townie, it's to your benefit to be in the background manipulating but never to be the center of attention | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On March 07 2013 05:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh man that sounds fun. What the fuck would I do? well the problem is having a vote list like this: player A: 1 vote Player B: 2 votes player c: 1 vote player d: 3 votes player e: 2 votes player f: 1 vote player g: 4 votes etc. then mafia can basically hammer whoever they want in a sense i want to do something that makes it harder for bad town and inactive scum to slide by on bandwagons though, forces them to actually put in the work and consider their vote as something really valuable | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 07 2013 05:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote: well the problem is having a vote list like this: player A: 1 vote Player B: 2 votes player c: 1 vote player d: 3 votes player e: 2 votes player f: 1 vote player g: 4 votes etc. then mafia can basically hammer whoever they want in a sense i want to do something that makes it harder for bad town and inactive scum to slide by on bandwagons though, forces them to actually put in the work and consider their vote as something really valuable so basically I can't pressure anyone at all and I can't change my vote in case a day vigilante shows up or busy tnkted realizes that he is a bus driver and can bus the nuke but actually is just a detective who jumped in the thread 20 hours in? I am not sure about that DrH. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
If I posted ##Vote: Kurumi would you feel more pressured than if I posted a big case showing why you were scum over and over which ended "I will be voting Kurumi and you should be too because he is scum"? No, clearly the second applies more pressure than the first, no matter where my vote actually is. My only concern with the set up would be newer players not reading/not understanding and doing something dumb right out the gate. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On March 07 2013 06:13 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I had this disagreement with Foolishness, I don't think you need to vote for someone to pressure them unless it's a hammer/mini game where things are really tight. Votes change at the drop of the hat and I really only feel pressured as scum if someone is bringing the heat in the thread, it's not really of consequence whether they drop a vote or an FoS. If someone makes a good case and tunnels you, that's what pressure is. Your actions in the voting thread shouldn't have significant consequences in the discussion thread. I am busy in real life. I am a detective. I show up 20 hours late into the day - I have a green check in a setup where there is only framers (show up as mafia, not inverse check) and the guy I have check on is up to be lynched. Only 25% of players did not vote and we can't force a no-lynch. Lock votes after 24 hours, give people to throw their ideas in, many things go on unnoticed and when everyone can chip in things get a lot better for town. Also this rule will kill activity to some degree. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
RongYI Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
