EPT##vote hapahauli
If you have any questions about me or anything game related to discuss with me concerning my character, please don't hesitate to ask.
Witchcraft Mini Mafia - Page 30
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
##vote hapahauli If you have any questions about me or anything game related to discuss with me concerning my character, please don't hesitate to ask. | ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
On December 16 2012 20:47 thrawn2112 wrote: lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply my read on zentor is still null. hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him. and hapa, I've changed my mind about providing reads on those 3 people and I think I shouldn't post read on them for now. For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly? I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible I still get how more than 3 people are finding this so scummy On December 15 2012 14:47 JieXian wrote: Hi and sorry I'm late, I'm at +8GMT and I didn't wake up as early as DarthPunk At first I was really confused (scummy read) about hapa's mindless babbling about 13-3, which ISN'T RELEVANT to anything at all because you can't change anything except stir the discussion towards the wrong direction. Later I got a stronger read from DP from his ridiculous "pressuring" above all for a point that's completely moot But above all there's Mr Zentor's relative non-chalance to everything seems to trump everything else as doesn't seem to give a damn to anything as townies are well on their way to lynching one another ##Vote MrZentor "At first -> later -> BUT ABOVE ALL " Shows my train of thought as I was considering different things but made my final decision on the thing that is standing out the most. | ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 16 2012 23:55 JieXian wrote: eywa I know you are doing something great for BW but I'd like you to post more and play the game more since you're already in it I fully intend on posting ;; I was out yesterday, no chance to post or read. Also, I've already pretty much done everything I am going to do for BW, just a couple details left to sort out, but that definitely won't be consuming my time. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Thrawn is an Opportunist On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote: ok ##Vote Djodref what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this? On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons 1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics Didn't Thrawn VOTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun ##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush... you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush. he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched: On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome i'll lynch lurkers LURKERS i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread. On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive? On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote: no this is a lie the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this? Didn't Thrawn VOTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched: Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread. Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! But I still really really like a JX lynch! But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive? He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn While you make a decent case against Thrawn, I still think that there is more of a case against hapahauli, thus I will not change my vote. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I see a lot of effort from both of them to be involved in this game. * We need to start focusing on who we are going to lynch, since im pretty sure we have to lynch in 4.5 hours. There are actually more lurkers than I would there would be yesterday.. this is because people either haven't kept their promise to be active or have started posting minimally to avoid a modkill. THREESR: I think he's gonna get replaced, so we should ignore him for now. As I see it, these are the acceptable options: DOYOUHAS: This guy's posts are decently long, but I didn't even know he existed until I looked at the player list. He is invisible. He is a lurker who is putting some effort into not looking like a lurker. MORBIDUS: classic lurker Bad options: ENYA: fuuu i thought he was gonna get replaced but he's talking for now. Not the best choice IMO because he looks ready to contribute now. CHEESECAKE: Also looks ready to start contributing more. NOTE: If threesr comes back in the thread to avoid a modkill then he goes on the lynch list. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:35 kushm4sta wrote: can we stfu about mrz and jx? I think they are both bad lynches. I see a lot of effort from both of them to be involved in this game. * We need to start focusing on who we are going to lynch, since im pretty sure we have to lynch in 4.5 hours. There are actually more lurkers than I would there would be yesterday.. this is because people either haven't kept their promise to be active or have started posting minimally to avoid a modkill. THREESR: I think he's gonna get replaced, so we should ignore him for now. As I see it, these are the acceptable options: DOYOUHAS: This guy's posts are decently long, but I didn't even know he existed until I looked at the player list. He is invisible. He is a lurker who is putting some effort into not looking like a lurker. MORBIDUS: classic lurker Bad options: ENYA: fuuu i thought he was gonna get replaced but he's talking for now. Not the best choice IMO because he looks ready to contribute now. CHEESECAKE: Also looks ready to start contributing more. NOTE: If threesr comes back in the thread to avoid a modkill then he goes on the lynch list. If we go by your logic, the mafia wins by simply being the most active player in the game... Which is not the way to go. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:34 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Care to elaborate? Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:44 Eywa- wrote: Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea. That is a scumhunting strategy. He is pressuring people. For that reason you want to lynch the strongest town in this game? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:44 Eywa- wrote: Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea. Why don't you make a case, then, if it's scummy behavior? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I still think morbidus is the best though | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:53 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Why don't you make a case, then, if it's scummy behavior? Because people who play are meant to read the thread, I made the point of "why", if you read you'll understand the justification. Whether or not you agree is up to you. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:57 kushm4sta wrote: Addendum to viable lynch candidates: add ewya as a good lurker lynch. I still think morbidus is the best though | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 17 2012 02:00 Eywa- wrote: Because people who play are meant to read the thread, I made the point of "why", if you read you'll understand the justification. Whether or not you agree is up to you. Town want to convince others that their top scumread is actually scum. Presenting a case with justification does that. Parking your vote on Hapa and telling people to go searching on their own isn't going to convince people. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 02:03 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Town want to convince others that their top scumread is actually scum. Presenting a case with justification does that. Parking your vote on Hapa and telling people to go searching on their own isn't going to convince people. One read through is enough. I thought that by definition, in order to participate, you'd have to be willing to read the thread. By saying you're not doing so, you just discredit your entire argument about thrawn even though some aspects may be valid. | ||
| ||
