Witchcraft Mini Mafia - Page 31

On December 17 2012 01:35 kushm4sta wrote:
can we stfu about mrz and jx? I think they are both bad lynches.
I see a lot of effort from both of them to be involved in this game.
*
We need to start focusing on who we are going to lynch, since im pretty sure we have to lynch in 4.5 hours.
There are actually more lurkers than I would there would be yesterday.. this is because people either haven't kept their promise to be active or have started posting minimally to avoid a modkill.
THREESR: I think he's gonna get replaced, so we should ignore him for now.
As I see it, these are the acceptable options:
DOYOUHAS: This guy's posts are decently long, but I didn't even know he existed until I looked at the player list. He is invisible. He is a lurker who is putting some effort into not looking like a lurker.
MORBIDUS: classic lurker
Bad options:
ENYA: fuuu i thought he was gonna get replaced but he's talking for now. Not the best choice IMO because he looks ready to contribute now.
CHEESECAKE: Also looks ready to start contributing more.

NOTE: If threesr comes back in the thread to avoid a modkill then he goes on the lynch list.

On December 17 2012 02:11 kushm4sta wrote:
@eywa I want you to pick another lynch. Here's why:
1 Scumreads are at their weakest d1. Lynching a town hapa would be terrible for town, because of how useful of an asset he can be.
2 No on agrees with you, so that lynch is just not going to happen today.

On December 17 2012 02:09 Morbidius wrote:
You are seriously going places with your lurker hunt, can you tell me why you think random lynching would be a better option over voting on JX or MrZ?

On December 17 2012 02:03 Eywa- wrote:
Oops... Messed up that last post (but can't edit) anyhow, the game isn't about finding who is the most active, that's easy to do and can be done by running a light scan of the post history, the game is about finding guilty vs innocent. I don't give favoritism based on activity... Seems like something that someone would do to chop off some town votes because they are "easy targets".

On December 17 2012 02:14 Eywa- wrote:

1. You're running an assumption that he is a town
2. If it doesn't happen today, then the town still has 3 more days to get something right before they lose.

On December 17 2012 02:04 Eywa- wrote:

One read through is enough. I thought that by definition, in order to participate, you'd have to be willing to read the thread. By saying you're not doing so, you just discredit your entire argument about thrawn even though some aspects may be valid.

On December 17 2012 02:24 kushm4sta wrote:

I'm not running under that assumption. He is the strongest town player in this game that is a fact. (you suck dp).
If we lynch him, the next 3 days will be harder.
There is no where near enough evidence to call him scum. I have no idea what his scumplay looks like but he looks town to me. Originally I was concerned with his bad cases but then I realized what he was doing and it no longer seemed scummy.

On December 17 2012 02:27 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


Apparently, you are running that assumption?

On December 17 2012 02:24 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


Lol, never said I didn't read the thread. Don't twist my words. I'm calling you out for being either too lazy to present your findings or scum trying to get everyone else to dig it up on their own.

Telling people "Oh, just read the thread, he's scummy because this" is pretty baseless if you don't present exactly what you're talking about.

On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote:
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?

On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


Yes we need a vote count.

I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?

On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:


hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it

I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative

Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.


and hapa, I've changed my mind about providing reads on those 3 people and I think I shouldn't post read on them for now.

For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly?

I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible

I still get how more than 3 people are finding this so scummy

On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:


hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it

I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative

Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.