Hero Mini Mafia - Page 3

On December 11 2012 09:29 Clarity_nl wrote:


Are you saying you have a townread on Palmar after he's made like 2 posts with knowledge of his alignment?

On December 11 2012 09:33 Clarity_nl wrote:
Okay, so let me put it this way.

If Palmar after making his video opened up his pm and turns out he's scum, what is he more likely to do.
1. 180 on all his reads he made in the video
2. Keep up with his prior reads regardless of who his teammates are

If he is scum, he hasn't had to think as one yet.

On December 11 2012 09:39 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yes, so assume all you said is true. Palmar didn't read his pm when he did the video and now he has. How does that make him town? Regardless of him "playing as town" the first 24h because he did a video. How are you not getting this?

On December 11 2012 09:42 Clarity_nl wrote:
wtf dude. I'm just saying you have absolutely no reason to have any kind of read on him yet, unless you somehow got a read of him repeating the thoughts he had in the video.

On December 11 2012 09:49 thrawn2112 wrote:


No, this doesn't make sense.

"I don't think he's lying about when he read the pm, considering he made an hour long video, I would trust his reads in the video in terms of being a townie mindset"

First, Palmer didn't check his role pm. I'm already satisfied that he wasn't "acting" and I'm not even 20 minutes into the vid. So yes, his words in the video do come from a town perspective.

HOWEVER, the video tells us absolutely nothing about palmer's alignment. In that video, palmer does not know his alignment. So how could anyone know palmer's alignment from the video? (at least until we get a lot of his post pm-checking opinions) Do you really not see that?

On December 11 2012 09:52 Clarity_nl wrote:


Yes, dude, fuck. But you said "I'm bad if you're scum" which implies you believe he's town WHICH IS FUCKING DUMB

On December 11 2012 09:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
WHAT THE FUCK I GIVE UP FUCK YOU

HE MADE THE READS WITHOUT KNOWING HIS ALIGNMENT, HOW CAN HIS READS THAT HE MADE BEFORE READING HIS PM BE ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE

On December 11 2012 10:00 Palmar wrote:
Rofl, this is hilarious.

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU!

On December 11 2012 10:03 Clarity_nl wrote:
Stupid.

On December 11 2012 10:06 Adam4167 wrote:
Dabears, you seem to be misunderstanding what I mean by "If I wanted to call you scummy, I would have". This is not me giving an indication as to my read on his alignment one way or another, this was me saying "I will call you scum when I am more confident that it is the case". I found his initial opening to be strange as its not something I can imagine myself doing, so I wanted him to explain his motives behind it. He did, eventually and I can relate to hating the initial policy discussion. I find Thrawn most likely a town with a risky opening. I did what I did early game to try and get a reaction out of him, it wasn't entirely productive, but I have a tentative read on thrawn from it.


Now, I'm going to sit down and watch Palmars video and give my thoughts.

On December 10 2012 12:51 Adam4167 wrote:


Right now, leaning scum.

I would like to know why he thinks I should of been voting for Thrawn from my exchange with him.

On December 10 2012 13:07 Adam4167 wrote:
In fact, why are you not voting me dabears?



You say you don't like me (I assume this means you think i'm scum?), you find my lack of vote strange and that my reactions feel forced. Why make a case like this if you aren't going to follow it with a vote?

##Vote: dabears

On December 11 2012 10:06 Adam4167 wrote:
Dabears, you seem to be misunderstanding what I mean by "If I wanted to call you scummy, I would have". This is not me giving an indication as to my read on his alignment one way or another, this was me saying "I will call you scum when I am more confident that it is the case". I found his initial opening to be strange as its not something I can imagine myself doing, so I wanted him to explain his motives behind it. He did, eventually and I can relate to hating the initial policy discussion. I find Thrawn most likely a town with a risky opening. I did what I did early game to try and get a reaction out of him, it wasn't entirely productive, but I have a tentative read on thrawn from it.


Now, I'm going to sit down and watch Palmars video and give my thoughts.

On December 11 2012 12:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
Eh, sure it's a bit milder than his other posts, but note how his aggression is always reactionary to aggression...... I dunno, I just don't see how it's a scum thing.

Saying he forgot who he was pressuring is like saying BH forgot who his mason partner was, so it was just him being... nicer than his other posts?

Adam might be scum but I don't see how that "scumslip" suddenly condemns him, and like Thrawn am rather confused you "dropped" (yes I realize you said you didn't drop it) your vote on Tunkeg.



What are you saying, that scum are incapable of misunderstanding anything?

On December 11 2012 12:50 Clarity_nl wrote:


Yes I understand, I'm just pointing out odds are he did not forget who his vote was on, that doesn't somehow absolve him.

I still don't see it/agree with the fact that it's a "scumslip. You guys are saying that a town Adam would say debears is twisting his words and lying, but again why is that the only thing he would say? Why can't a town Adam think a scum debears is misunderstanding him and just clarify, without him going "OMFG BTW UR SCUM!!!!"

Scum don't push scum agendas with every post, and town don't push their lynch with every post.....
Anyway I guess I'll just let Adam speak for himself but don't expect an Adam vote from me unless there's an actual case that goes beyond this one point.