It distinctly reads: "At any point, once per game"
Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 76
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
It distinctly reads: "At any point, once per game" | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:34 Clarity_nl wrote: I think hapa is acting like his town self more and more. Hapa instead of us convincing we shouldn't vote cyllo, perhaps convince us to vote for you? I've offered my reasons. I've offered my party. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=73#1444 Do you agree with me? Then vote me. I'll be voting for myself: ##Vote Hapahauli Right now I'm trying to show you guys that putting blind faith in Syllo is stupid. There's no sane reason for him to withhold reads. There's no threat to members on the party. There's no risk of "mafia manipulation" or whatever the fuck he things the "reasons" are. | ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:32 Acrofales wrote: Do you believe he's town? If you do, why do you think he would take scum along on purpose? All that really matters here is whether syllo is town or scum (or 3rd party). Sorry, that was written in a hurry. Reading it now it seems unclear how i meant it. I was talking hypothetically. I just wanted to line out why people might be against his handling of the party selection.. I lean town on Syllo. I am currently considering switching my vote to Syllo from Kita, not sure about it though. I will elaborate on that more, but I have work to do right now. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:31 Acrofales wrote: I don't think you're doing his filter justice with this post. He has given a rather important scumread. Whether it's right or not I am having a hard time determining, but the fact that Sandro isn't in here telling Syllo he's bad/stupid/scum for not recognizing him as town is almost MORE telling than the read in itself. I haven't seen Sandro allow people to call him scum as town without a fight. Now Sandro would not be my first choice for a lynch, and I would generally be opposed to a D1 lynch based on this little information, but I am not getting the town vibes that Sandro usually throws off in spades, which, combined with Syllo's read is quite telling. I am not the only one in the thread feeling that way. Granted, Syllo could be scum and very manipulative, managing to get us all to switch off Sandro, but that would be a completely new meta for him. The only scumgame I played with him, he disappeared from the thread and called everybody stupid. Town was onto him pretty early. He has not played like that at all this game. Well I'm not super-familiar with Syllo's meta, and fact is, he hasn't done much this game at all. And I still can't reconcile how withholding his team is a good idea, much less how everyone else seems to blindly accept it. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:37 Hapahauli wrote: I've offered my reasons. I've offered my party. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=382922¤tpage=73#1444 Do you agree with me? Then vote me. I'll be voting for myself: ##Vote Hapahauli Right now I'm trying to show you guys that putting blind faith in Syllo is stupid. There's no sane reason for him to withhold reads. There's no threat to members on the party. There's no risk of "mafia manipulation" or whatever the fuck he things the "reasons" are. Could you expand on your goodkarma town read? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:08 syllogism wrote: I guess if Sandroba is mafia, what I said about marvel's play not making strategical sense from mafia point of view is moot. In addition, he doesn't seem worried about dying in the near future, considering his hp related remark and him already announcing that he may run for an election in the future. Regardless, it's not relevant now and I am not going to go through his filter to determine whether it makes sense content-wise. That's not important right now though and a content based evaluation has to be made when it is. I've a team ready. Not entirely satisfied with it as usually figuring out 3 virtually certain townies is easier; perhaps it's the format or the players complicating things or me just not being familiar with a lot of people here. Around 4 hours until deadline, is this correct? I find this quite curious given you corrected drazerk on something in the op and apparently asked the host about it. Why not just check the deadline yourself? | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote: Could you expand on your goodkarma town read? I've seen him play two mafia games: Mafia LVII: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=361826&user=81106 Newbie XXIII: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=355874&user=81106 He also played a mafia game in Rockband Mini, but replaced after a few posts. Not worth mentioning. In these games, his behavior rides along the lines of "mafia wanting to blend in." He doesn't post often, and when he does, it is only when he's asked to do so or to sheep on the "analysis" of a popular scumread. He overall really tries to not to get noticed, and his mentality in this game is the exact opposite. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
##vote Syllo | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Well I hope that Syllo is town for our sake | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:45 marvellosity wrote: I find this quite curious given you corrected drazerk on something in the op and apparently asked the host about it. Why not just check the deadline yourself? I don't understand your point here, how is something like that alignment indicative at all? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 23 2012 05:01 syllogism wrote: I don't understand your point here, how is something like that alignment indicative at all? Because a conversational question you could easily find yourself seems somewhat out of character. Do I really have to connect the dots on why that could be alignment indicative? | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 23 2012 05:04 marvellosity wrote: Because a conversational question you could easily find yourself seems somewhat out of character. Do I really have to connect the dots on why that could be alignment indicative? I was reasonably sure and was writing a post. Feel free to interpret it in any way you like, but it is not indicative of anything. | ||
CaveJohnson
278 Posts
On November 23 2012 04:58 Hapahauli wrote: yaaaaay another sheeper. Well I hope that Syllo is town for our sake I'm just taking the enemy of my enemy approach with this election. Might be worth doing the same for consolidation | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Who are you currently supporting? I've seen you tear down a bunch of campaigns, but you've proposed no alternative yourself. @ Cave Johnson On November 23 2012 05:12 CaveJohnson wrote: I'm just taking the enemy of my enemy approach with this election. Might be worth doing the same for consolidation Yes let's sheep a guy without thinking about his alignment because we think the other guy is scum. Nevermind making a read on the guy we're voting, let's just consolidate. Someone needs to shoot/attack/kill/whatever this guy. | ||
iamperfection
United States9639 Posts
[b]## vote hapa [b//] | ||
iamperfection
United States9639 Posts
| ||
CaveJohnson
278 Posts
On November 23 2012 05:26 Hapahauli wrote: @ Marv Who are you currently supporting? I've seen you tear down a bunch of campaigns, but you've proposed no alternative yourself. @ Cave Johnson Yes let's sheep a guy without thinking about his alignment because we think the other guy is scum. Nevermind making a read on the guy we're voting, let's just consolidate. Someone needs to shoot/attack/kill/whatever this guy. Anyone is better than someone you believe is scum. | ||
iamperfection
United States9639 Posts
| ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 23 2012 05:26 Hapahauli wrote: @ Marv Who are you currently supporting? I've seen you tear down a bunch of campaigns, but you've proposed no alternative yourself. @ Cave Johnson Yes let's sheep a guy without thinking about his alignment because we think the other guy is scum. Nevermind making a read on the guy we're voting, let's just consolidate. Someone needs to shoot/attack/kill/whatever this guy. marv was like one of the first people to vote syllogism. when even I am following the thread closer than you are, you have a problem | ||
| ||