|
On December 10 2012 11:40 iamperfection wrote:
What would be the downside for sending an action austin?
Checkmate
What would be the upside?
If the upside is "someone could have messed with syllo, therefore you'd have gotten a heal off" then you need to explain to me why scum would mess with syllo and let me heal a townie.
And if that's the upside, then the equally-silly downside is "remaining scum can force a player's action onto him/can redirect, and could have used me to make sure he got healed up before lavos was summoned"
|
On December 10 2012 11:41 Promethelax wrote:
Well you are an idiot for not trusting me. These things happen.
Austin: what role do you believe the last scum has? Do you think he has a kp role or that he is hiding his role behind the factional kp?
So here's what I'm working off at the moment: scum is someone we all trust. The scum team as a whole started pushing this person into a good position from the beginning. Maybe a bus or two, maybe scum team shooting this person and knowing that he'd get heals later on, something like that.
Whoever they chose for that, it's probably what they thought to be their strongest ability, or the one that would be most relevant lategame. I could see kp, as ... I haven't quite kept up with all the extra claims and half-claims the last day or two, but I don't THINK we have all our damage explained yet?
I think the most likely role is something like a mimic/morph sort of deal. Choose a player, get their ability for the cycle. Scum could be sure that no matter how the lavos fight works, their mimic player could get the most useful ability out of all the townies, as there would almost certainly be claims before endgame or when lavos starts. phagga had a reactive copy ability, but we haven't seen anything proactive yet and it would make sense for that to be the person protected for endgame.
Beyond that...could potentially be someone that can leave battle for a cycle or two? If someone had a role to flee, to become untargetable for a cycle or two, then maybe scum is banking on that player being able to avoid whatever it is lavos would do, be untargetable, and make sure that lavos was only attacking townies.
Off the top of my head, those are two things we haven't seen (except drazerk's one-night untargetable claim) that would kind of make sense to protect until lavos.
|
Hahaha. This is way better. I'll speculate all day about who the person might be, or what role they might have, but I just don't know who it is.
If scum has someone who levels up like kita does, that's an easy choice. Going to be the strongest by the end of game, maybe can use multiple actions at the start of the lavos fight and inflict some serious damage.
Or...if oats can actually use multiple actions, that's another strong ability to protect. I don't like the chances on that compared to other things, because I would guess that Grey wouldn't give a scum with a very powerful ability the power to use 2 actions per night. I'd probably rather have one strong ability reserved for lategame than 2 smaller ones.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Vote: austinmcc
Why not kita if you want to kill a 3rd party then? Acro has been pretty helpful for town, kita, not so much
You people are impossible to please. I roleblocked mafia on 4 different occasions, opposed sandroba d1, wrote several cases against risk, pushed a VE lynch, and was the first person to question s&b's role and I still have to listen to this 3p nonsense?
Don't make me flip that power switch of yours!
|
On December 10 2012 12:03 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 11:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Vote: austinmcc
Why not kita if you want to kill a 3rd party then? Acro has been pretty helpful for town, kita, not so much You people are impossible to please. I roleblocked mafia on 4 different occasions, opposed sandroba d1, wrote several cases against risk, pushed a VE lynch, and was the first person to question s&b's role and I still have to listen to this 3p nonsense? Don't make me flip that power switch of yours!
I didn't mess you claiming 3P did I?
|
Austin, say that again, but in English this time.
|
On December 10 2012 12:07 Promethelax wrote:
Austin, say that again, but in English this time.
Which bit?
|
"I didn't mess you claiming 3p did I?"
I actually have no idea what you are trying to say there.
|
On December 10 2012 12:08 Promethelax wrote:
"I didn't mess you claiming 3p did I?"
I actually have no idea what you are trying to say there.
Gotcha.
I vote acrofales, because I'd rather kill third party that I don't trust than someone I don't have a scumread on.
Oats responded to that:On December 10 2012 11:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Vote: austinmcc
Why not kita if you want to kill a 3rd party then? Acro has been pretty helpful for town, kita, not so much
Kita responded with this:On December 10 2012 12:03 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 11:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Vote: austinmcc
Why not kita if you want to kill a 3rd party then? Acro has been pretty helpful for town, kita, not so much You people are impossible to please. I roleblocked mafia on 4 different occasions, opposed sandroba d1, wrote several cases against risk, pushed a VE lynch, and was the first person to question s&b's role and I still have to listen to this 3p nonsense? Don't make me flip that power switch of yours!
When Oats posted his response, I didn't remember kita ever claiming to be third party. When kita responded without saying "...I'm not third party," it made me think I'd missed something.
|
On December 10 2012 12:08 Promethelax wrote:
"I didn't mess you claiming 3p did I?"
I actually have no idea what you are trying to say there.
he meant "miss" instead of "mess". Oats is being incorrigible
|
Oh...I typoed miss and wrote mess. 3P = third party.
|
CAN a third party player be counted towards the Town-count for damage dealt to Lavos?
|
it was the miss to mess thing that got me.
Hope, since you are around what do you think about Austin's proposal to kill Acro since we know 100% that Acro is not town.
|
that'll depend on the answer to my question.
|
Fair. I saw your question after I posted mine and went 'oooooh good question' to myself.
|
On December 10 2012 12:17 Promethelax wrote:
Fair. I saw your question after I posted mine and went 'oooooh good question' to myself.
^
|
Oats I want you to explain why you shot phagga instead of SnB after SnB was the only player to report activating your poximity mine.
|
On December 10 2012 12:14 Hopeless1der wrote:
CAN a third party player be counted towards the Town-count for damage dealt to Lavos?
CAN an orange count towards the number of apples in my hand?
|
lulz.
Okay, so Hope, now what do you think?
|
On December 10 2012 12:22 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 12:14 Hopeless1der wrote:
CAN a third party player be counted towards the Town-count for damage dealt to Lavos? CAN an orange count towards the number of apples in my hand?
Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
