| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:21 Keirathi wrote: austin: the reason we're voting you today is because you didn't attempt to heal anyone last night. Why not? This | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
and tell me who the last scum is if it isn't you. You aren't even scum hunting. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:21 Keirathi wrote: austin: the reason we're voting you today is because you didn't attempt to heal anyone last night. Why not? On December 09 2012 06:48 syllogism wrote: It was announced that whoever wasn't lynched was going to be roleblocked. There was no reason for syllo to make this an idle threat, I actually believe that he's tired of this game and didn't care who got lynched. So it's not really worth sending in an action that's guaranteed to get blocked.It's absolutely fine to think phagga is mafia and it's certainly easier for you as you know your own alignment. He can very well be mafia and I don't particularly care who we lynch first as the remaining person is going to get roleblocked anyway. The point was I don't find your case on him alignment indicative. If I had time or will to compare your posting in this game with some other games, perhaps I could tell. This game is just too long and it's getting more and more difficult to care. Why can't it just end already, who is tormenting us for no reason at all Syllo, I checked. No, I did not claim an ability in 1999 AD. I did not know if I had one, there was nothing in my original role about that. Turns out I can choose any of the three gurus and be that guy for 1999 AD. So...either heal/shield, or if we think we've got enough of that, I can go counterattack and hope lavos hits me. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Why do half of the things you said make no sense :o Also why won't you full roleclaim? | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:29 Promethelax wrote: says the guy who won't tell me his name. I still don't get why you care about the names | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:29 Promethelax wrote: says the guy who won't tell me his name. Did you ask me for my name? I didn't see it. I am Tata. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:25 Promethelax wrote: Austin, answer the question. and tell me who the last scum is if it isn't you. You aren't even scum hunting. Been answered now, figured it was apparent why I wouldn't do anything last night. I can't tell you who the last scum is. I don't like any of the "obvious" choices for scum. Today's lynch shouldn't be "pick a person, force them to carry town by finding the remaining scum because dear Lord I sure don't know who the last guy is." There are quite a few players who seem to have given up on this game cycles ago, some players have pretty much explicitly said that. So if you're voting me because I haven't found the remaining scum...okay. Nobody else seems to have a clear idea of who the final scum is...if I actually FOUND the scum I'd look kind of suspect, because then I'm the only guy in the game with a clear scum read. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:32 iamperfection wrote: I still don't get why you care about the names a combination of curiosity and the desire to have all our information out on the table because I believe that scum no longer has a way to punish name claimers. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:33 Promethelax wrote: a combination of curiosity and the desire to have all our information out on the table because I believe that scum no longer has a way to punish name claimers. The information is completely pointless though. 100% absolutely pointless. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:33 austinmcc wrote: Been answered now, figured it was apparent why I wouldn't do anything last night. I can't tell you who the last scum is. I don't like any of the "obvious" choices for scum. Today's lynch shouldn't be "pick a person, force them to carry town by finding the remaining scum because dear Lord I sure don't know who the last guy is." There are quite a few players who seem to have given up on this game cycles ago, some players have pretty much explicitly said that. So if you're voting me because I haven't found the remaining scum...okay. Nobody else seems to have a clear idea of who the final scum is...if I actually FOUND the scum I'd look kind of suspect, because then I'm the only guy in the game with a clear scum read. In other words your saying since everyone else is being lazy I can be lazy too. What you trying to blend in? | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:35 Keirathi wrote: The information is completely pointless though. 100% absolutely pointless. Not necessarily. I'll know that when I have all the information. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:36 Promethelax wrote: Not necessarily. I'll know that when I have all the information. No, you're dumb. It's useless information. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:30 iamperfection wrote: Your an idiot. We know wierd stuff has happened all game there is no reason not to send an action especially a heal. I had no reason to believe syllo was lying. Nobody had reason to interfere with him. If scum blocks his roleblock then I get a heal off, which is a bad deal for scum. I may do dumb things from time to time, but not sending in an action last night wasn't dumb imo. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
it is probably useless information. But not necessarily. I want the full claims. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:36 Promethelax wrote: Not necessarily. I'll know that when I have all the information. I don't completely trust you so if you want my name you can dive through my filter and find my crumb. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
Checkmate | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
Austin: what role do you believe the last scum has? Do you think he has a kp role or that he is hiding his role behind the factional kp? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On December 10 2012 11:35 iamperfection wrote: I don't have a scumread on anyone. There are enough people hiding information/abilities that it could easily be one of those, or near anyone else. At this point, I'm just more convinced that whoever is remaining is someone that nobody suspects. Including me.In other words your saying since everyone else is being lazy I can be lazy too. What you trying to blend in? Frankly, it makes the most sense if this person isn't conceding. It's got to be someone that's trusted enough that they can maybe direct abilities against lavos in a way that somehow benefits them, or ... I dunno. This starts to sound really conspiracy-theory-ish, but that's what I've got. I don't know WHO the person is, but someone above suspicion is really the only explanation for why the person wouldn't concede. Right? They had to know they'd last a couple cycles. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
MaxPax vs Rogue
Clem vs Bunny
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
ByuN vs SHIN
Maru vs Krystianer
WardiTV Team League
Patches Events
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
