Newbie Mini Mafia XXX - Page 9

On November 03 2012 11:20 debears wrote:


No. That's wrong. Saying you lied means you are lying. If you are lying, you are a liar. Odd that you are saying that

On November 03 2012 11:17 Obzy wrote:
@debears - Your reaction really does seem out of place, when I'm rereading. I've been refreshing constantly, trying to read everything and make a useful post, but nothing really seemed like it would contribute to a discussion, and I don't want to have pointless posts for the sake of "being active". Contributing, not spamming.

Upon looking at it that way, your posts and being interested in Alsn's word choice is surprisingly defensive. Given that there wasn't really any way for other players to pop their heads in and comment without semi-defusing the situation saying "it wasn't that big of a deal", why hold onto it? Quite specifically, - why ask something like that? I didn't really think it worth paying any mind to, but you kept going on it.

(And now, just above, you're asking djo why he didn't get involved in your argument - I didn't want to get involved either, it seemed largely purposeless.)

jesus i type this post, read for spelling mistakes, reopen a new browser to make sure i'm not missing some sort of new information and fucking blammo like 5 posts

On November 03 2012 11:12 Rad wrote:


@Djo

If no one lurks, the lurker policy has done its job. That's all it's there to do, stop people from lurking. Nothing more, nothing less. Let's move on shall we?

On November 03 2012 11:21 Clarity_nl wrote:


It's cause I read your Mafia QT I guess, you're right, in the thread itself you were super serious. So why the change of tone?
XXIX is my first mafia game on TL, so it's my first encounter with debears. Maybe debears opens like this in every mafia game regardless? I'll go dig around. Feel free to comment debears.

On November 03 2012 10:20 Alsn wrote:
I like it how you say 99% of the time, yet I know from reading XXIX's scum QT that you were away on purpose for the last lynch. I also bet you haven't yet participated in anywhere near 100 lynches, so technically that's a lie. Although, I probably should have paid more attention to what you actually voted for that game as opposed to whether or not you were actually around so I'll let that one slide.

I'm Alsn, I'll be around for flip-time generally, but they happen at 1 am local time so don't expect me to stick around for too long afterwards.

Prior games include XXV(VT), XXVIII(VT) and XXIX also as VT.

And yea, if given the choice between weak scum reads and hardcore lurkers, I'll hunt down and feed the hardcore lurker gone off cheesecake first chance I get. That being said, I'm off to lurk(also known as sleep, for those of you concerned with base things such as human metabolic function).

On November 03 2012 11:21 Clarity_nl wrote:


It's cause I read your Mafia QT I guess, you're right, in the thread itself you were super serious. So why the change of tone?
XXIX is my first mafia game on TL, so it's my first encounter with debears. Maybe debears opens like this in every mafia game regardless? I'll go dig around. Feel free to comment debears.

On November 03 2012 10:11 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hopefully we won't have to deal with lurkers altogether, but yes. A roco or inig lynch instead of a daoud lynch would've been much better for us. So yeah, information is good which means we want people talking which means policy lynch on lurkers is a good thing unless we have an exceptional read on someone. But I wouldn't enforce any policy other than that.

I will be here and active before every lynch.

On November 03 2012 11:27 Djodref wrote:


@ Clarity

What other policies did you have in mind ?

On November 03 2012 11:26 Rad wrote:


@Alsn

Don't make the "lie" too big of a deal. People throw out random percentages all the time. Also, using red there was a bit over-dramatic, don't you think?

@debears

I don't see much of a good reason to push him on this issue anymore. TBH I was a bit frustrated with you not showing up at night 1 to help talk me down from shooting kush, but then again, if you were there, you might have pushed me into it (like dandel did) ^^ I get a sense of that same frustration from alsn right now, whether it's contrived or real. Because in the end, 99% is a straight up wrong statistic, and it's best if you don't use completely bs stats in trying to prove a point.

On November 03 2012 11:24 Djodref wrote:


The policy prevents mafia players from lurking but it doesn't stop anyone from being inactive. And the policy is the best excuse ever for mafia to lynch an inactive town player with IRL issues. This game is full of active players and small enough to call directly a player on active lurking, blending in or pure lurking. I don't think we need the policy and I'm going to get very suspicious on players lynching according to the policy only.

On November 03 2012 11:34 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
From this post onward, nobody is allowed to discuss policy lynching.

On November 03 2012 11:35 debears wrote:


Agreed. Djo and rad

Why are you two policy jerking each other?

On November 03 2012 11:36 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


You obviously don't understand the flavor of this thread.

On November 03 2012 11:38 Djodref wrote:
@ Rad

I think I'm making a good point and I'm feeling like you are trying to shush me. But I would agree that it's not good to spend to much time discussing it too much. What else do you want to talk about ?