|
On November 09 2012 15:39 thrawn2112 wrote:If I had to guess at an sk? idk, I haven't been thinking about setup stuff. The entire day of roleblocking speculation was extremely boring and I don't care about that part of the thread too much. Sk could probably be anyone I think is town. Once we have a smaller pool of players and more flips I think we'll have an easy job of sorting out what is going on with the night actions. If I had to guess... release maybe? (just because he claimed roleblock, and it would makes sense with how much guilt he's shown all game.) So... mafia if you aren't release, shoot release pls he's the sk i promise data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" /posting pants I'll be gone all day. I'd just like to point it out there that most people play bulletproof SK which is why I never considered kush for it. However it would actually make sense for kush to pick investigation immune rather then bulletproof if he is aware of how others regard his play. Anyway I think key to finding the SK will be to look into the rb's night 2 because it's very likely the SK was roleblocked that night.
|
On November 09 2012 17:55 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 15:39 thrawn2112 wrote:If I had to guess at an sk? idk, I haven't been thinking about setup stuff. The entire day of roleblocking speculation was extremely boring and I don't care about that part of the thread too much. Sk could probably be anyone I think is town. Once we have a smaller pool of players and more flips I think we'll have an easy job of sorting out what is going on with the night actions. If I had to guess... release maybe? (just because he claimed roleblock, and it would makes sense with how much guilt he's shown all game.) So... mafia if you aren't release, shoot release pls he's the sk i promise data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" /posting pants I'll be gone all day. I'd just like to point it out there that most people play bulletproof SK which is why I never considered kush for it. However it would actually make sense for kush to pick investigation immune rather then bulletproof if he is aware of how others regard his play. Anyway I think key to finding the SK will be to look into the rb's night 2 because it's very likely the SK was roleblocked that night.
I find it interesting that as soon as a good deal of suspicion is levelled your way you suddenly are worried about whom the serial killer may be.
|
On November 09 2012 19:17 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 17:55 risk.nuke wrote:On November 09 2012 15:39 thrawn2112 wrote:If I had to guess at an sk? idk, I haven't been thinking about setup stuff. The entire day of roleblocking speculation was extremely boring and I don't care about that part of the thread too much. Sk could probably be anyone I think is town. Once we have a smaller pool of players and more flips I think we'll have an easy job of sorting out what is going on with the night actions. If I had to guess... release maybe? (just because he claimed roleblock, and it would makes sense with how much guilt he's shown all game.) So... mafia if you aren't release, shoot release pls he's the sk i promise data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" /posting pants I'll be gone all day. I'd just like to point it out there that most people play bulletproof SK which is why I never considered kush for it. However it would actually make sense for kush to pick investigation immune rather then bulletproof if he is aware of how others regard his play. Anyway I think key to finding the SK will be to look into the rb's night 2 because it's very likely the SK was roleblocked that night. I find it interesting that as soon as a good deal of suspicion is levelled your way you suddenly are worried about whom the serial killer may be. I'm just telling town how to catch the SK if I die before I can post again. If you have a problem with my logic you're free to adress it. I'm not worried about getting lynched.
|
On November 09 2012 20:06 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 19:17 DarthPunk wrote:On November 09 2012 17:55 risk.nuke wrote:On November 09 2012 15:39 thrawn2112 wrote:If I had to guess at an sk? idk, I haven't been thinking about setup stuff. The entire day of roleblocking speculation was extremely boring and I don't care about that part of the thread too much. Sk could probably be anyone I think is town. Once we have a smaller pool of players and more flips I think we'll have an easy job of sorting out what is going on with the night actions. If I had to guess... release maybe? (just because he claimed roleblock, and it would makes sense with how much guilt he's shown all game.) So... mafia if you aren't release, shoot release pls he's the sk i promise data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" /posting pants I'll be gone all day. I'd just like to point it out there that most people play bulletproof SK which is why I never considered kush for it. However it would actually make sense for kush to pick investigation immune rather then bulletproof if he is aware of how others regard his play. Anyway I think key to finding the SK will be to look into the rb's night 2 because it's very likely the SK was roleblocked that night. I find it interesting that as soon as a good deal of suspicion is levelled your way you suddenly are worried about whom the serial killer may be. I'm just telling town how to catch the SK if I die before I can post again. If you have a problem with my logic you're free to adress it. I'm not worried about getting lynched. It's not your logic we're worried about.
Obsession with SK (and no mention of scum at night ever) because he's scum and fears the SK shot, but not the scum's.
|
On November 09 2012 20:43 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 20:06 risk.nuke wrote:On November 09 2012 19:17 DarthPunk wrote:On November 09 2012 17:55 risk.nuke wrote:On November 09 2012 15:39 thrawn2112 wrote:If I had to guess at an sk? idk, I haven't been thinking about setup stuff. The entire day of roleblocking speculation was extremely boring and I don't care about that part of the thread too much. Sk could probably be anyone I think is town. Once we have a smaller pool of players and more flips I think we'll have an easy job of sorting out what is going on with the night actions. If I had to guess... release maybe? (just because he claimed roleblock, and it would makes sense with how much guilt he's shown all game.) So... mafia if you aren't release, shoot release pls he's the sk i promise data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" /posting pants I'll be gone all day. I'd just like to point it out there that most people play bulletproof SK which is why I never considered kush for it. However it would actually make sense for kush to pick investigation immune rather then bulletproof if he is aware of how others regard his play. Anyway I think key to finding the SK will be to look into the rb's night 2 because it's very likely the SK was roleblocked that night. I find it interesting that as soon as a good deal of suspicion is levelled your way you suddenly are worried about whom the serial killer may be. I'm just telling town how to catch the SK if I die before I can post again. If you have a problem with my logic you're free to adress it. I'm not worried about getting lynched. It's not your logic we're worried about. Obsession with SK (and no mention of scum at night ever) because he's scum and fears the SK shot, but not the scum's.
Yeah. I was thinking something similar. The sudden speculation on the serial killer at this point seems off.
|
On November 09 2012 01:23 risk.nuke wrote: Acrofales your case is both wrong and selective. We can start with the selective part. You've gone over my games trying to find examples (tunneling) that would make me stick out. Furthermore my 180 on prplhz is pressure because it implied I want an explanation. You dismiss it as nothing that required an explanation proving once again your idiocy and wrongly assume prplhz didn't feel the need to answer it. He just replaced out before he could.
Killing Muso was logical, you might interpret it as not caring (because you suck) because I didn't show any direct feelings about him. This was because I didn't have a read on him prior to what happened. It was just unpersonally logical in the essence that it would have been stupid not to lynch him. However I cared about killing him. Or I wouldn't had pushed for it.
As far as caring goes, look at my posts when you brought up a no-lynch and try to dismiss that as not caring you tunneling moron. Okay. Time to pay attention to this.
Firstly, what I actually DID was go over your cases thinking I'd find similar playstyle, because Mattchew indicated that you're playing to your town meta... and he probably has more experience playing with you in normal games than I do. What I found was a rather different risk.nuke.
Secondly, you are being highly speculative about what prplhz would do if he had still been around. "nice 180" is a flippant remark that I personally would either ignore or return, depending on how much time passed before I saw it. Pressure it is, barely. Pressuring hard, as you said it was in a later post, it was clearly not.
Killing Muso was logical. Agreed. You cared about KILLING him. Agreed. You did NOT care about figuring out whether he was town. Everybody else at least pondered it. You just went straight into "fakeclaim = death", because you already KNEW he was town AND an easy lynch. Always good when one of the other lynch candidates is your scumbuddy.
You cared about, or claimed to care about getting a lynch in. At the time that seemed townie. However the lynch was aimed rather well at Promethelax, a (presumed) townie. Your behaviour after that:
On November 06 2012 06:42 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 06:31 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:27 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:10 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:08 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:05 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:03 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:00 Acrofales wrote:On November 06 2012 05:56 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 05:54 Acrofales wrote: [quote] Yes. And the improbability of a vig shooting Zealos. Why, did you think zealos was town? I didn't have a scumread on him. That is actually a giant towntell on Zealos, as I mentioned in my nightpost. I needed more to get him out of null, but was hardly surprised by him flipping town (although I was surprised by him being killed. All he had in his filter was a wish for Prome and Kush to die). If thats your read on zealos why don't you think it was a mafia kp? He said that he does think it was Mafia KP. He thought that Matt was the SK. Okey, must have missed that. Thanks and Apologies. @acro: scum = mafia. What are your thoughts on today's lynch? Where will your vote be and why? Any of the list of candidates I provided earlier > No-Lynch. But with the lack of pressence in the thread right now we're not looking like we can lynch anyone. We're 4 here right now. You (risk) Me (prome) Thrawn Acro DP Kush Draz that is enough to lynch. Don't give up now. oh thrawn and kush is here and mkfuba just dropped in. Now I'm just undecided who I want to kill. I face the problem of having warmed up to you so now I'm in a gut vs logic debate. Considering killing DP or mkfuba or drazek. The two later just showed up suspiciously. So.. people don't seem to want to lynch Prom after all. Lets try something else: throwing names out there just because I can!
If the lynch on DP got or fuba got picked up, you could jump on without a problem If not, well then, no harm done, because you never really did anything. Just thew their names out there (oh, and if out of the three Drazak gets picked to run with, you're cool with your vote on Prom, so no worries).
None of those lynches got going, though, and instead we have:
On November 06 2012 07:39 risk.nuke wrote: I was observing, I wanted to see how the hopeless wagon would go.
Yes, I can see how much you cared about the D2 lynch. You were incredibly involved. You really cared about getting the right guy. Pushed your reads hard. It was a marvelous example of townyism! /golfclap
|
Oh, and because you derps forced my claim, I will undoubtedly get roleblocked tonight. So I am looking for the scum roleblocker.
I have some ideas, but anybody who thinks he knows who the scum roleblocker is, make yourself heard!
|
@risk if I were sk I would definitely pick investigation immune over bulletproof.
next we kill risk then release then dp them prome that's what I'm thinking right now
|
On November 09 2012 23:29 kushm4sta wrote: @risk if I were sk I would definitely pick investigation immune over bulletproof.
next we kill risk then release then dp them prome that's what I'm thinking right now Why risk over release?
|
On November 10 2012 00:08 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 23:29 kushm4sta wrote: @risk if I were sk I would definitely pick investigation immune over bulletproof.
next we kill risk then release then dp them prome that's what I'm thinking right now Why risk over release?
Release is a surer thing but he's sk not mafia. You are right though. They both have an kp so might as well kill the sk.
|
On November 10 2012 00:54 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2012 00:08 Acrofales wrote:On November 09 2012 23:29 kushm4sta wrote: @risk if I were sk I would definitely pick investigation immune over bulletproof.
next we kill risk then release then dp them prome that's what I'm thinking right now Why risk over release? Release is a surer thing but he's sk not mafia. You are right though. They both have an kp so might as well kill the sk. So if I understand you right, you do not suspect thrawn, DP or anybody else?
|
I suspect release, risk, dp, and possibly prome.
|
On November 01 2012 10:08 Acrofales wrote: Firstly, millers should claim, masons should not. There is currently NO reason to claim mason and it is an easy claim to make if you or your partner runs into trouble, or it's lylo. However, masons SHOULD make a very subtle breadcrumb (note the subtle, I don't even want to whiff it if it exists). Then notify your mason buddy about how it's done. If mafia/sk inadvertently offs one of the masons, the other one has some decent evidence to back his claim up.
On November 09 2012 04:32 Promethelax wrote: Oh I've been meaning to ask:
Acro do you have a RB BC for the last two nights? and
Thrawn did you BC that your check was on Kush?
those two things keep nudging me in the back of the brain when I try to think about which claims I believe.
On November 09 2012 04:40 Acrofales wrote: No. 1. I was lazy. 2. I was fully expecting to get shot before any necessity to claim came up.
I have been thinking and I'm a little worried about Acro's claim, because I expect someone who would go into that much detail about mason breadcrumbing would bc his own role.
|
There are already 2 confirmed blues and 3 claimed blues. dp has even been hinting that he'll claim something later on. Are we really just thinking it's ok that we have 5-6 blue roles with a unclaimed vig/sk? I'm thinking that one of the people who claimed a roleblocking role might be scum roleblocker.
|
On November 10 2012 02:51 thrawn2112 wrote: There are already 2 confirmed blues and 3 claimed blues. dp has even been hinting that he'll claim something later on. Are we really just thinking it's ok that we have 5-6 blue roles with a unclaimed vig/sk? I'm thinking that one of the people who claimed a roleblocking role might be scum roleblocker. And townies are fakeclaiming roleblocked. Yay for logic!
|
On November 10 2012 01:49 kushm4sta wrote: I suspect release, risk, dp, and possibly prome. Why do you suspect dp and possibly prome if Risk and I have the two KP? The connotation with your earlier post is that you want both of us dead because of our KP. What do DP and prome play in this scenario? Here's what I think: It's very interesting that you are going so far as to implicate two people whom you don't think have kp and intentionally obfuscate when Acro seems to understand correctly your previous post.
I'll be on in about 20 minutes for about 5 minutes and then my lunch ends.
|
Hey don't include me. I just asked a question. I was just really surprised by Kush's trusting nature all of a sudden. Now stop distracting me, I have to read Thrawn's filter and see if he is a hyperparanoid townie or scum trying to seed unrest in our happy scumlynching town.
|
my post was not about you acro; it was about Kush.
|
Out of time. See you guys in 3 hours.
|
Decided on Thrawn. Now Release. Crazy town or crazy SK?
|
|
|
|