EPTTL Mafia LVI - Page 61
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
I'll wait for ET to respond before deciding on his lynch. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
His post this game all are filler-level post with 0 content. | ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
| ||
|
Twelve
United States90 Posts
| ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
On July 04 2012 18:19 Vivax wrote: Lynch twelve or katina. I think Shiao has posted enough to be estimated better once the two of them flip. Katina ignoring so many scummy players to suspect Adam is just ridiculous. I think I've found something to Adam's defense. I'm not ignoring them, I just don't think that ET or Twelve is Mafia. I admit they are scummy in some way or another but it's not strong enough to lynch them just yet. On July 04 2012 19:18 ShiaoPi wrote: Dropping by before going out. @NSH: I'll explain my vote on hyaach again. I used the term "aggressive" on BM as in he is throwing around suspicions wildly with not much more than a hunch. Now to hyaach's aggression, I was only asking him on his opinions/reads and he responds with a straight out "no, don't like you" and when other people also ask him he goes "why should I share a case?". It is just unfathomable to me why he does not want to share with town. I also defended vivax since I know from experience that he might be an "easy" mislynch (did that already), so at least to me there is enough reason to defend him. @Katina/Twelve: Why do you want to lynch the useless troll? Won't give us anything besides flipping a coin on alignment. Then we have on person narrowed down and can focus elsewhere. Even useless trolls can turn out to be Mafia. On July 04 2012 22:09 Mandalor wrote: I got my vote on either Katina or Twelve right now. Katina pretty much just followed VE's thoughts on Day1, semi defended BM and now made a case of casualman who imo cannot be read and better be ignored for now. Twelve. As MattChew pointed out earlier, he accused the two most popular lynch candidates without providing a basis for this. Just an hour after mK was modkilled and flipped green, he says how it was "a lurker lynch [he] really didn't agree with". How convenient to post that after the modkill and never mention mK before. I agree with VE's thoughts, yes. It was D1 and I had a town read on him and he's a good player. So of course I would be inclined to consider what he says and look at the person myself then come up with my conclusion. I semi defended BM because I wanted to see more from him. He's hard to read at first. I was expressing my thoughts in my recent post. I didn't know that posting on a lurker (along with several others that aren't lurkers was scummy.... | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
So many people look a little scummy, but right now I'm on board with ET as an option. Not reading thread - On July 03 2012 10:38 EchelonTee wrote: So far, hasn't made the promised posts - that's 2 vig shots? no claims? On July 03 2012 23:01 EchelonTee wrote: Plus, after his whole exchange with drwiggl3s, who he concludes just has poor logic, ET NEVER steps in to defend drwiggl3s. I know at least a few people dropped in to say they read wiggl3s as bad town. ET never came back to do so, despite being around at points throughout the night. Going to make a few posts on who I think is scum, following. Also, NSH. I know you're on ShiaoPi, and I've got to say that I'm reading him scum as now. In our newbie games together, I felt like we had the exact same thought processes. We had similar reads in XIII, and in XV we both read one scum member as townie and were his only defenders until I switched last moment. I asked him about his read on drwiggl3s to see if we matched up there, and I didn't love his answer there, nor his being on BKE early. So at least this far, I've got a scumread on him but it's based on us not agreeing, which doesn't feel like very strong evidence. | ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
If we kill people who look scummy and additionally didn't contribute much yet/hard to read/lurking, while trying to stay in a good light in front of town (like twelve, katina, ET, grush) as opposed to players who looked scummy and then wrote a lot as defense (like ShiaoPi, BKE) or players who act trolly or simply act (like casualman and Kurumi). then we can lynch people later who already gave more information and are forced to do so to remain consistent. If we kill highly informative scummy players before, then it's unlikely that we will gain more information from their flip regarding the scummy players who didn't post much yet. With this, scummy, lurking players will also be given the pressure to post more, while active scum has to remain active anyway. Thoughts? | ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
| ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On July 05 2012 01:47 Katina wrote: What? Silent scummy players first, loud scummy players later. Loud players more likely to dig their own graves, so less dangerous than silent scummy players who are able to remain silent if we pursue the loud ones. | ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
##Vote for people On July 05 2012 01:45 Vivax wrote: (like twelve, katina, ET, grush) | ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
| ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
| ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:39 Acrofales wrote: Maju, Adam, Grush, casualman: where the hell are you? In the garden of my mind. | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On July 05 2012 00:26 Hyaach wrote: A town grush in LV wasnt afraid to defend towns when he need to nor was he reluctant to share his read. His interaction in the thread was far more active too. His post this game all are filler-level post with 0 content. Well, it's good to be curious. | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On July 05 2012 00:08 Twelve wrote: I agree with Kitana and the causualman lynch. ##vote: casualman Let's give the fish some food! | ||
| ||
