Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia X - Page 18

Furthermore, the lynching of Arctic only serves to make an imallinson vote more worthwhile. The failure to lynch was not due to lack of suspicion and so scum could've easily kept Arctic alive another night to push imallinson for another lynching if he was town and used their hit to focus on someone else.

On April 30 2012 21:12 Stossel wrote:

Furthermore, the lynching of Arctic...
##Vote: imallinson

On April 30 2012 21:22 insectoceanx wrote:
@Zealos

You voted for imallinson before? Why are you voting for me now?

@Townspeople

We all need consensus to get a lynch through, as stossel said above me, sticking to the plan is important as

On April 30 2012 21:12 Stossel wrote:Furthermore, the lynching of Arctic only serves to make an imallinson vote more worthwhile. The failure to lynch was not due to lack of suspicion and so scum could've easily kept Arctic alive another night to push imallinson for another lynching if he was town and used their hit to focus on someone else.

On April 30 2012 10:50 insectoceanx wrote:
Also, since the replacements did not vote, the mafia must be someone who is still active.

On April 30 2012 21:22 insectoceanx wrote:
We all need consensus to get a lynch through, as stossel said above me, sticking to the plan is important as

On April 30 2012 10:50 insectoceanx wrote:
Also, since the replacements did not vote, the mafia must be someone who is still active.

He's almost made it his job to be useless to town. Had absolutely no opinion on anybody in town in his big summary post ("seems town, seems scum, null read, might be scum" etc etc -- you can check his filter and read it, it's not hard to find in his 4 posts), except for yomi, who he bandwagoned onto very easily. He had an FoS on Zealos after that, then decided to make his 3rd post on....Dracolich? He has volunteered no other opinions seperate from when I asked him directly about Zealos and oneplus, and his post there was STILL the "leaning town" and "fairly scummy" non-commital posting style he's done.

imallinson has been heavily lurking this game. With 5 days of play gone he has only made 5 posts. Of these, the first post essentially mentioned two players and said that he was unsure of either of them. This added nothing to the game. His first act of any gravity was to vote for yomi but this vote was one of the last votes cast and yomi was already the most likely choice to get lynched.At this point voting for yomi was an extremely safe move for mafia as it was a common choice and a townie would be lynched. Now that we know yomi was townie this vote becomes more suspicious. Alone it might not be much but combined with the lurking and lack of solid posting it becomes suspicious. Looking back at the accusation against yomi, it initially seems to have content but reeally the only thing he used against yomi was

I personally see this accusation:

as rather weak.

Imallinson recently contributed new ideas with his voting for Dracho (Gossemerr). We can see though that all the information used against Dracho in this post was posted before imallinson's initial list of reads. Why, imallinson, was none of this observed earlier? Also, Dracho was initially imallinson's third choice for scum behind yomi and Zealos. After yomi died Dracho suddenly moved up to first choice over Zealos with no explanation why his suspicions over Zealos diminished. After imallinsons first content filled post he finger of suspicions' Zealos while all the evidence that he later uses to vote Dracholich has already been posted. Also, he posted a lot more evidence against Dracho then against yomi. Assuming allin read everyone's posts carefully, his initial vote should have been for Dracho with yomi as a second choice. Why did that not happen imallinson?

On May 01 2012 00:11 Zealos wrote:

Because you irritate me big time. How dare you come back after being a complete lurker, only to call the only people who bothered keeping town active mafia.

On April 30 2012 10:50 insectoceanx wrote:
Also, since the replacements did not vote, the mafia must be someone who is still active.

On May 01 2012 05:37 MajuGarzett wrote:
##Vote: imallinson
Keeping my vote from last time. He still hasn't responded to one of the arguments I quoted and has lurked.

On May 01 2012 00:11 Zealos wrote:

Because you irritate me big time. How dare you come back after being a complete lurker, only to call the only people who bothered keeping town active mafia.

On May 01 2012 01:31 imallinson wrote:

What exactly is the plan. Because if it is blindly going along the same path as yesterday that isn't helpful. Along with this


Your recent posting doesn't make much sense unless you are trying to get town to blindly follow you into lynching an easy town target (me).