Storm Mafia - Page 35

On February 23 2012 06:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:

Thanks for letting us know

On February 23 2012 06:25 DoctorHelvetica wrote:


It's like I'm playing with Coagulation all over again. They're obnoxious but this kind of playstyle is hard to get any read from other than "annoying". The only thing that worries me is that BH seemingly hasn't contributed a single original thought or point despite posting prolifically.

On February 23 2012 06:21 Dirkzor wrote:
Its not like the BC wagon is forming quickly. Scum voting for RedFF can just sit there and hope 7 votes are enough to hang RedFF.

And to be precise we have 3 wagons.

RedFF
Bloodyc0bble
-------------->Blazinghand <--------------

RedFF is a non-issue. He don't want to play anymore. If he returns we can take the discussion again. There are argument for and against keeping him alive even if he is scum.

Bloodyc0bble is gone. He don't care. He is indifferent. He have been a target for some time now but he don't want to defend himself. Okayish lynch.

Blazinghand is so far of his meta and have been sheeping thought troughout the game. He is the best lynch today and everyone should vote him.

On February 23 2012 06:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Ok, i have to take off for work soon but as it seems people are being retarded I have to come in and defend myself. Reasons like this post are reasons I am more or less a dick this game. You just said redff is a non issue because he doesn't want to play? If he is scum he is still going to help his team and guess what else? It means you just gave him a free pass to lurk the fuck out of the game without ever contributing and not die unless he actively posts. There are no activity requirements this game and you are letting someone go with a free pass seriously.

You then paint a bullseye on me for being indifferent and not defending myself? The case against me is terrible. Wasting my time on a case that imo doesn't warrant being lynched on is something I should never have to respond to. The fact that said case is also being pushed by players who know better is even sadder.


Whats even worse is you have those same people pushing my lynch saying I am more likely scum, yet one of the major reasons for their defense (as near all of them have also defended redff), is that there was near no resistance to his lynch. Guess what? I have seen very few people defend me through this lynch yet redff has had a ton defending him.

On February 23 2012 06:30 Blazinghand wrote:
Hm that's a good point. IT could be a function of WHEN your wagon started though right

On February 23 2012 06:30 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah I'm going back to redFF

On February 23 2012 06:31 VisceraEyes wrote:


lmao

On February 23 2012 06:31 DoctorHelvetica wrote:

It's a shit point. The best defense is being behind in votes. It's unnecessary for anyone to hard defend scum BC unless he gets 1-2 behind.

On February 23 2012 06:29 VisceraEyes wrote:


Look again pal - I've counted layabout, Blazinghand and WBG all defending you so far.

On February 23 2012 06:34 Dirkzor wrote:
I never said the case againts you is good. I actually said your filter did not look scummy. But you have also not contributed at all the entire game. Which make you an okay lynch.

You have a point that I'm giving RedFF a free pass. It was never meant to be "never lynch RedFF until he post". Merely a way to get people to vote where I want them, BH. I will of course reevalutate my position on RedFF as the game goes on but right now I don't think he is a good lynch.

On February 23 2012 06:33 Blazinghand wrote:


wouldn't it be unneccessary... until he gets ahead?

On February 23 2012 06:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote:


That depends on your preference as scum. I would gun it a little bit early to avoid the inevitable "he changed his vote as soon as BC started winning" thing if I'm scum. It could be a little bit behind, tied, ahead, it doesn't really matter. redFF winning would be all the defense BC needs.

On February 23 2012 06:34 layabout wrote:

Saying VE is full of crap, his arguments suck and refusing to sheep VE and BH is not a defense of BC.